Literature DB >> 27208240

Gains and Losses of Cis-regulatory Elements Led to Divergence of the Arabidopsis APETALA1 and CAULIFLOWER Duplicate Genes in the Time, Space, and Level of Expression and Regulation of One Paralog by the Other.

Lingling Ye1, Bin Wang1, Wengen Zhang1, Hongyan Shan2, Hongzhi Kong2.   

Abstract

How genes change their expression patterns over time is still poorly understood. Here, by conducting expression, functional, bioinformatic, and evolutionary analyses, we demonstrate that the differences between the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) APETALA1 (AP1) and CAULIFLOWER (CAL) duplicate genes in the time, space, and level of expression were determined by the presence or absence of functionally important transcription factor-binding sites (TFBSs) in regulatory regions. In particular, a CArG box, which is the autoregulatory site of AP1 that can also be bound by the CAL protein, is a key determinant of the expression differences. Because of the CArG box, AP1 is both autoregulated and cross-regulated (by AP1 and CAL, respectively), and its relatively high-level expression is maintained till to the late stages of sepal and petal development. The observation that the CArG box was gained recently further suggests that the autoregulation and cross-regulation of AP1, as well as its function in sepal and petal development, are derived features. By comparing the evolutionary histories of this and other TFBSs, we further indicate that the divergence of AP1 and CAL in regulatory regions has been markedly asymmetric and can be divided into several stages. Specifically, shortly after duplication, when AP1 happened to be the paralog that maintained the function of the ancestral gene, CAL experienced certain degrees of degenerate evolution, in which several functionally important TFBSs were lost. Later, when functional divergence allowed the survival of both paralogs, CAL remained largely unchanged in expression, whereas the functions of AP1 were gradually reinforced by gains of the CArG box and other TFBSs.
© 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27208240      PMCID: PMC4902614          DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  85 in total

Review 1.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

Authors:  A Force; M Lynch; F B Pickett; A Amores; Y L Yan; J Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution.

Authors:  Xionglei He; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Emerging principles of regulatory evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Orchestration of the floral transition and floral development in Arabidopsis by the bifunctional transcription factor APETALA2.

Authors:  Levi Yant; Johannes Mathieu; Thanh Theresa Dinh; Felix Ott; Christa Lanz; Heike Wollmann; Xuemei Chen; Markus Schmid
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Disruption of the petal identity gene APETALA3-3 is highly correlated with loss of petals within the buttercup family (Ranunculaceae).

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Chunce Guo; Wengen Zhang; Peipei Wang; Lin Li; Xiaoshan Duan; Qinggao Du; Liang Zhao; Hongyan Shan; Scott A Hodges; Elena M Kramer; Yi Ren; Hongzhi Kong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) regulates development pathways throughout the life cycle of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Weiwei Deng; Hua Ying; Chris A Helliwell; Jennifer M Taylor; W James Peacock; Elizabeth S Dennis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Regulation of the arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1.

Authors:  C Gustafson-Brown; B Savidge; M F Yanofsky
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-01-14       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa in Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  P Huijser; J Klein; W E Lönnig; H Meijer; H Saedler; H Sommer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Redundant regulation of meristem identity and plant architecture by FRUITFULL, APETALA1 and CAULIFLOWER.

Authors:  C Ferrándiz; Q Gu; R Martienssen; M F Yanofsky
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  Tempo and mode in evolution of transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Kacy L Gordon; Ilya Ruvinsky
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  10 in total

1.  Differences in DNA Binding Specificity of Floral Homeotic Protein Complexes Predict Organ-Specific Target Genes.

Authors:  Cezary Smaczniak; Jose M Muiño; Dijun Chen; Gerco C Angenent; Kerstin Kaufmann
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of RcMYB Genes in Rhodiola crenulata.

Authors:  Binjie Xu; Bang Chen; Xiaoli Qi; Shunli Liu; Yibing Zhao; Ce Tang; Xianli Meng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Expression patterns of Passiflora edulis APETALA1/FRUITFULL homologues shed light onto tendril and corona identities.

Authors:  Livia C T Scorza; Jose Hernandes-Lopes; Gladys F A Melo-de-Pinna; Marcelo C Dornelas
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.250

4.  Novel Traits, Flower Symmetry, and Transcriptional Autoregulation: New Hypotheses From Bioinformatic and Experimental Data.

Authors:  Aniket Sengupta; Lena C Hileman
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  LEAFY is a pioneer transcription factor and licenses cell reprogramming to floral fate.

Authors:  Run Jin; Samantha Klasfeld; Yang Zhu; Meilin Fernandez Garcia; Jun Xiao; Soon-Ki Han; Adam Konkol; Doris Wagner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Protein Farnesylation Takes Part in Arabidopsis Seed Development.

Authors:  Valentin Vergès; Christelle Dutilleul; Béatrice Godin; Boris Collet; Alain Lecureuil; Loïc Rajjou; Cyrille Guimaraes; Michelle Pinault; Stéphane Chevalier; Nathalie Giglioli-Guivarc'h; Eric Ducos
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  FRUITFULL-like genes regulate flowering time and inflorescence architecture in tomato.

Authors:  Xiaobing Jiang; Greice Lubini; José Hernandes-Lopes; Kim Rijnsburger; Vera Veltkamp; Ruud A de Maagd; Gerco C Angenent; Marian Bemer
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Genome-Wide Identification of Direct Targets of ZjVND7 Reveals the Putative Roles of Whole-Genome Duplication in Sour Jujube in Regulating Xylem Vessel Differentiation and Drought Tolerance.

Authors:  Meng Li; Lu Hou; Chenxing Zhang; Weicong Yang; Xinru Liu; Hanqing Zhao; Xiaoming Pang; Yingyue Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Genome-wide analysis of UGT gene family identified key gene for the biosynthesis of bioactive flavonol glycosides in Epimedium pubescens Maxim.

Authors:  Yu Yao; Jiajun Gu; Yanjiao Luo; Yuanyue Wang; Yongzhen Pang; Guoan Shen; Baolin Guo
Journal:  Synth Syst Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-31

Review 10.  Beyond the Genetic Pathways, Flowering Regulation Complexity in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Stella Quiroz; Juan Carlos Yustis; Elva C Chávez-Hernández; Tania Martínez; Maria de la Paz Sanchez; Adriana Garay-Arroyo; Elena R Álvarez-Buylla; Berenice García-Ponce
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.