Literature DB >> 28733422

Differences in DNA Binding Specificity of Floral Homeotic Protein Complexes Predict Organ-Specific Target Genes.

Cezary Smaczniak1,2, Jose M Muiño3, Dijun Chen2, Gerco C Angenent1,4, Kerstin Kaufmann5.   

Abstract

Floral organ identities in plants are specified by the combinatorial action of homeotic master regulatory transcription factors. However, how these factors achieve their regulatory specificities is still largely unclear. Genome-wide in vivo DNA binding data show that homeotic MADS domain proteins recognize partly distinct genomic regions, suggesting that DNA binding specificity contributes to functional differences of homeotic protein complexes. We used in vitro systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment followed by high-throughput DNA sequencing (SELEX-seq) on several floral MADS domain protein homo- and heterodimers to measure their DNA binding specificities. We show that specification of reproductive organs is associated with distinct binding preferences of a complex formed by SEPALLATA3 and AGAMOUS. Binding specificity is further modulated by different binding site spacing preferences. Combination of SELEX-seq and genome-wide DNA binding data allows differentiation between targets in specification of reproductive versus perianth organs in the flower. We validate the importance of DNA binding specificity for organ-specific gene regulation by modulating promoter activity through targeted mutagenesis. Our study shows that intrafamily protein interactions affect DNA binding specificity of floral MADS domain proteins. Differential DNA binding of MADS domain protein complexes plays a role in the specificity of target gene regulation.
© 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28733422      PMCID: PMC5590503          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.17.00145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  69 in total

1.  Plant biology. Floral quartets.

Authors:  G Theissen; H Saedler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Solution structure of the MEF2A-DNA complex: structural basis for the modulation of DNA bending and specificity by MADS-box transcription factors.

Authors:  K Huang; J M Louis; L Donaldson; F L Lim; A D Sharrocks; G M Clore
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  MIKC-type MADS-domain proteins: structural modularity, protein interactions and network evolution in land plants.

Authors:  Kerstin Kaufmann; Rainer Melzer; Günter Theissen
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Genetic Control of Flower Development by Homeotic Genes in Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  Z Schwarz-Sommer; P Huijser; W Nacken; H Saedler; H Sommer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Ternary complex formation between the MADS-box proteins SQUAMOSA, DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA is involved in the control of floral architecture in Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  M Egea-Cortines; H Saedler; H Sommer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Basic pentacysteine proteins mediate MADS domain complex binding to the DNA for tissue-specific expression of target genes in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Sara Simonini; Irma Roig-Villanova; Veronica Gregis; Bilitis Colombo; Lucia Colombo; Martin M Kater
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 11.277

7.  FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) regulates development pathways throughout the life cycle of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Weiwei Deng; Hua Ying; Chris A Helliwell; Jennifer M Taylor; W James Peacock; Elizabeth S Dennis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  GL3 encodes a bHLH protein that regulates trichome development in arabidopsis through interaction with GL1 and TTG1.

Authors:  C T Payne; F Zhang; A M Lloyd
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  The unique structure of A-tracts and intrinsic DNA bending.

Authors:  Tali E Haran; Udayan Mohanty
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.318

10.  The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  Remo Rohs; Sean M West; Alona Sosinsky; Peng Liu; Richard S Mann; Barry Honig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  Intrafamily Protein Interactions Contribute to DNA Localization.

Authors:  Diarmuid S Ó'Maoiléidigh
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Unraveling the role of MADS transcription factor complexes in apple tree dormancy.

Authors:  Vítor da Silveira Falavigna; Edouard Severing; Xuelei Lai; Joan Estevan; Isabelle Farrera; Véronique Hugouvieux; Luís Fernando Revers; Chloe Zubieta; George Coupland; Evelyne Costes; Fernando Andrés
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 10.323

3.  Integrative inference of transcriptional networks in Arabidopsis yields novel ROS signalling regulators.

Authors:  Inge De Clercq; Jan Van de Velde; Xiaopeng Luo; Li Liu; Veronique Storme; Michiel Van Bel; Robin Pottie; Dries Vaneechoutte; Frank Van Breusegem; Klaas Vandepoele
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 15.793

4.  Synergistic Binding of bHLH Transcription Factors to the Promoter of the Maize NADP-ME Gene Used in C4 Photosynthesis Is Based on an Ancient Code Found in the Ancestral C3 State.

Authors:  Ana Rita Borba; Tânia S Serra; Alicja Górska; Paulo Gouveia; André M Cordeiro; Ivan Reyna-Llorens; Jana Knerová; Pedro M Barros; Isabel A Abreu; Maria Margarida Oliveira; Julian M Hibberd; Nelson J M Saibo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Structural Basis for Plant MADS Transcription Factor Oligomerization.

Authors:  Xuelei Lai; Hussein Daher; Antonin Galien; Veronique Hugouvieux; Chloe Zubieta
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  Transcriptome analysis of gynoecium morphogenesis uncovers the chronology of gene regulatory network activity.

Authors:  Kimmo I Kivivirta; Denise Herbert; Clemens Roessner; Stefan de Folter; Nayelli Marsch-Martinez; Annette Becker
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  MADS transcription factors cooperate: complexities of complex formation.

Authors:  Veronique Hugouvieux; Chloe Zubieta
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Architecture of gene regulatory networks controlling flower development in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Dijun Chen; Wenhao Yan; Liang-Yu Fu; Kerstin Kaufmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The HTPmod Shiny application enables modeling and visualization of large-scale biological data.

Authors:  Dijun Chen; Liang-Yu Fu; Dahui Hu; Christian Klukas; Ming Chen; Kerstin Kaufmann
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-07-05

10.  The MADS-box transcription factor PHERES1 controls imprinting in the endosperm by binding to domesticated transposons.

Authors:  Rita A Batista; Jordi Moreno-Romero; Yichun Qiu; Joram van Boven; Juan Santos-González; Duarte D Figueiredo; Claudia Köhler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.