Literature DB >> 27206500

Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses.

Christopher L Striemer1,2, Karyn Russell3, Priya Nath3.   

Abstract

Previous research has indicated that rightward prism adaptation can reduce symptoms of spatial neglect following right brain damage. In addition, leftward prism adaptation can create "neglect-like" patterns of performance in healthy adults on tasks that measure attention and spatial biases. Although a great deal of research has focused on which behaviors are influenced by prism adaptation, very few studies have focused directly on how the magnitude of visual shift induced by prisms might be related to the observed aftereffects, or the effects of prisms on measures of attentional and spatial biases. In the current study, we examined these questions by having groups of healthy adult participants complete manual line bisection and landmark tasks prior to and following adaptation to either 8.5° (15 diopter; n = 22) or 17° (30 diopter; n = 25) leftward shifting prisms. Our results demonstrated a significantly larger rightward shift in straight-ahead pointing (a measure of prism aftereffect) following adaptation to 17°, compared to 8.5° leftward shifting prisms. In addition, only 17° leftward shifting prisms resulted in a significant rightward shift in line bisection following adaptation. However, there was a significant change in performance on the landmark task pre- versus post-adaptation in both the 8.5° and 17° leftward shifting prism groups. Interestingly, correlation analyses indicated that changes in straight-ahead pointing pre- versus post-adaptation were positively correlated with changes in performance on the manual line bisection task, but not the landmark task. These data suggest that larger magnitudes of prism adaptation seem to have a greater influence on tasks that require a response with the adapted hand (i.e., line bisection), compared to tasks that only require a perceptual judgment (i.e., the landmark task). In addition, these data provide further evidence that the effects of prisms on manual and perceptual responses are not related to one another.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Line bisection; Neglect; Prism adaptation; Pseudoneglect; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27206500     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4678-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  56 in total

1.  Through a prism darkly: re-evaluating prisms and neglect.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; James A Danckert
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Functional anatomy of the therapeutic effects of prism adaptation on left neglect.

Authors:  J Luauté; C Michel; G Rode; L Pisella; S Jacquin-Courtois; N Costes; F Cotton; D le Bars; D Boisson; P Halligan; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect.

Authors:  Tanja C W Nijboer; Rob D McIntosh; Gudrun M S Nys; H Chris Dijkerman; A David Milner
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  The disengage deficit in hemispatial neglect is restricted to between-object shifts and is abolished by prism adaptation.

Authors:  I Schindler; R D McIntosh; T P Cassidy; D Birchall; V Benson; M Ietswaart; A D Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Aftereffect induced by prisms of different power in the rehabilitation of neglect: A multiple single case report.

Authors:  Alessio Facchin; Nicoletta Beschin; Alessio Toraldo; Carlo Cisari; Roberta Daini
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.138

6.  Space exploration in neglect.

Authors:  H O Karnath; M Niemeier; J Dichgans
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Differential influences of prism adaptation on reflexive and voluntary covert attention.

Authors:  Christopher Striemer; Jeffery Sablatnig; James Danckert
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  The anatomy of visual neglect.

Authors:  Dominic J Mort; Paresh Malhotra; Sabira K Mannan; Chris Rorden; Alidz Pambakian; Chris Kennard; Masud Husain
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the Landmark Task.

Authors:  M Harvey; A D Milner; R C Roberts
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Spatial working memory deficits represent a core challenge for rehabilitating neglect.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; Susanne Ferber; James Danckert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prism adaptation speeds reach initiation in the direction of the prism after-effect.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; Carley A Borza
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Opposing force fields induce direction-specific sensorimotor adaptation but a non-specific perceptual shift consistent with a contraction of peripersonal space representation.

Authors:  Nicolas X Leclere; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Yann Coello; Christophe Bourdin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Choosing Sides: Impact of Prismatic Adaptation on the Lateralization of the Attentional System.

Authors:  Stephanie Clarke; Nicolas Farron; Sonia Crottaz-Herbette
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-23

4.  Aftereffects to Prism Exposure without Adaptation: A Single Case Study.

Authors:  Federica Albini; Alberto Pisoni; Anna Salvatore; Elena Calzolari; Carlotta Casati; Stefania Bianchi Marzoli; Andrea Falini; Sofia Allegra Crespi; Claudia Godi; Antonella Castellano; Nadia Bolognini; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-05

5.  Prismatic Adaptation Modulates Oscillatory EEG Correlates of Motor Preparation but Not Visual Attention in Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Martina Bracco; Domenica Veniero; Massimiliano Oliveri; Gregor Thut
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A Brief Exposure to Leftward Prismatic Adaptation Enhances the Representation of the Ipsilateral, Right Visual Field in the Right Inferior Parietal Lobule.

Authors:  Sonia Crottaz-Herbette; Eleonora Fornari; Isabel Tissieres; Stephanie Clarke
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-09-27

7.  Visuomanual Vertical Prism Adaptation: Aftereffects on Visuospatial and Auditory Frequency Representations.

Authors:  Clémence Bonnet; Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat; Vincent Ardonceau; Cyril Sirandré; Patrick Bard; Carine Michel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-26

8.  Multisensory and Modality-Specific Influences on Adaptation to Optical Prisms.

Authors:  Elena Calzolari; Federica Albini; Nadia Bolognini; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Towards a neuro-computational account of prism adaptation.

Authors:  Pierre Petitet; Jill X O'Reilly; Jacinta O'Shea
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.139

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.