Literature DB >> 28755239

Prism adaptation speeds reach initiation in the direction of the prism after-effect.

Christopher L Striemer1,2, Carley A Borza3,4.   

Abstract

Damage to the temporal-parietal cortex in the right hemisphere often leads to spatial neglect-a disorder in which patients are unable to attend to sensory input from their contralesional (left) side. Neglect has been associated with both attentional and premotor deficits. That is, in addition to having difficulty with attending to the left side, patients are often slower to initiate leftward vs. rightward movements (i.e., directional hypokinesia). Previous research has indicated that a brief period of adaptation to rightward shifting prisms can reduce symptoms of neglect by adjusting the patient's movements leftward, toward the neglected field. Although prism adaptation has been shown to reduce spatial attention deficits in patients with neglect, very little work has examined the effects of prisms on premotor symptoms. In the current study, we examined this in healthy individuals using leftward shifting prisms to induce a rightward shift in the egocentric reference frame, similar to neglect patients prior to prism adaptation. Specifically, we examined the speed with which healthy participants initiated leftward and rightward reaches (without visual feedback) prior to and following adaptation to either 17° leftward (n = 16) or 17° rightward (n = 15) shifting prisms. Our results indicated that, following adaptation, participants were significantly faster to initiate reaches towards targets located in the direction opposite the prism shift. That is, participants were faster to initiate reaches to right targets following leftward prism adaptation and were faster to initiate reaches to left targets following rightward prism adaptation. Overall, these results are consistent with the idea that prism adaptation can influence the speed with which a reach can be initiated toward a target in the direction opposite the prism shift, possibly through altering activity in neural circuits involved in reach planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Prism adaptation; Visuomotor control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28755239     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5038-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  64 in total

1.  Through a prism darkly: re-evaluating prisms and neglect.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; James A Danckert
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Anatomical correlates of directional hypokinesia in patients with hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Ayelet Sapir; Julie B Kaplan; Biyu J He; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect.

Authors:  Tanja C W Nijboer; Rob D McIntosh; Gudrun M S Nys; H Chris Dijkerman; A David Milner
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  The disengage deficit in hemispatial neglect is restricted to between-object shifts and is abolished by prism adaptation.

Authors:  I Schindler; R D McIntosh; T P Cassidy; D Birchall; V Benson; M Ietswaart; A D Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Space exploration in neglect.

Authors:  H O Karnath; M Niemeier; J Dichgans
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Prismatic adaptation as a novel tool to directionally modulate motor cortex excitability: evidence from paired-pulse TMS.

Authors:  Barbara Magnani; Carlo Caltagirone; Massimiliano Oliveri
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Attention for action? Examining the link between attention and visuomotor control deficits in a patient with optic ataxia.

Authors:  Christopher Striemer; Jason Locklin; Annabelle Blangero; Yves Rossetti; Laure Pisella; James Danckert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  Margarita Sarri; Richard Greenwood; Lalit Kalra; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Spatial working memory deficits represent a core challenge for rehabilitating neglect.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; Susanne Ferber; James Danckert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual Feedback Modulates Aftereffects and Electrophysiological Markers of Prism Adaptation.

Authors:  Jasmine R Aziz; Stephane J MacLean; Olave E Krigolson; Gail A Eskes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.