Literature DB >> 18303569

Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect.

Tanja C W Nijboer1, Rob D McIntosh, Gudrun M S Nys, H Chris Dijkerman, A David Milner.   

Abstract

Prism adaptation has been shown to temporarily ameliorate the symptoms of unilateral neglect. The underlying mechanisms of change are not yet fully understood. In this study, we investigate the influence of this treatment on attentional orienting under conditions of exogenous (peripheral onset) and endogenous (central symbolic) cueing. In one patient with left visual extinction and recovered neglect, and another patient with left visual neglect, visuo-motor adaptation to a rightward prismatic shift of 10 degrees improved leftward orienting of attention following an endogenous but not an exogenous cue; leftward re-orienting of attention was also improved in the endogenous task for the second patient. We suggest that prism adaptation may ameliorate neglect by improving compensatory processes of leftward voluntary orienting, rather than by a fundamental change in attentional bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18303569     DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f4cb67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  20 in total

1.  The disengage deficit in hemispatial neglect is restricted to between-object shifts and is abolished by prism adaptation.

Authors:  I Schindler; R D McIntosh; T P Cassidy; D Birchall; V Benson; M Ietswaart; A D Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of prism adaptation on motor-intentional spatial bias in neglect.

Authors:  Paola Fortis; Peii Chen; Kelly M Goedert; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Prism adaptation speeds reach initiation in the direction of the prism after-effect.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; Carley A Borza
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses.

Authors:  Christopher L Striemer; Karyn Russell; Priya Nath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Prism adaptation differently affects motor-intentional and perceptual-attentional biases in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Paola Fortis; Kelly M Goedert; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Modelling the differential effects of prisms on perception and action in neglect.

Authors:  Steven Leigh; James Danckert; Chris Eliasmith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Recent trends in rehabilitation interventions for visual neglect and anosognosia for hemiplegia following right hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Kathleen B Kortte; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2011-01-01

8.  Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Adrian Kamer; Andrea M Loftus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Prism adaptation for spatial neglect after stroke: translational practice gaps.

Authors:  A M Barrett; Kelly M Goedert; Julia C Basso
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 10.  Recent advances in the understanding of neglect and anosognosia following right hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Kathleen Kortte; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.