| Literature DB >> 27199928 |
Trinity L Hamilton1, Roderick J Bovee2, Sarah R Sattin2, Wiebke Mohr2, William P Gilhooly3, Timothy W Lyons4, Ann Pearson2, Jennifer L Macalady5.
Abstract
Mahoney Lake in British Columbia is an extreme meromictic system with unusually high levels of sulfate and sulfide present in the water column. As is common in strongly stratified lakes, Mahoney Lake hosts a dense, sulfide-oxidizing phototrophic microbial community where light reaches the chemocline. Below this "plate," the euxinic hypolimnion is anoxic, eutrophic, saline, and rich in sulfide, polysulfides, elemental sulfur, and other sulfur intermediates. While much is known regarding microbial communities in sunlit portions of euxinic systems, the composition and genetic potential of organisms living at aphotic depths have rarely been studied. Metagenomic sequencing of samples from the hypolimnion and the underlying sediments of Mahoney Lake indicate that multiple taxa contribute to sulfate reduction below the chemocline and that the hypolimnion and sediments each support distinct populations of sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) that differ from the SRB populations observed in the chemocline. After assembling and binning the metagenomic datasets, we recovered near-complete genomes of dominant populations including two Deltaproteobacteria. One of the deltaproteobacterial genomes encoded a 16S rRNA sequence that was most closely related to the sulfur-disproportionating genus Dissulfuribacter and the other encoded a 16S rRNA sequence that was most closely related to the fatty acid- and aromatic acid-degrading genus Syntrophus. We also recovered two near-complete genomes of Firmicutes species. Analysis of concatenated ribosomal protein trees suggests these genomes are most closely related to extremely alkaliphilic genera Alkaliphilus and Dethiobacter. Our metagenomic data indicate that these Firmicutes contribute to carbon cycling below the chemocline. Lastly, we recovered a nearly complete genome from the sediment metagenome which represents a new genus within the FCB (Fibrobacteres, Chlorobi, Bacteroidetes) superphylum. Consistent with the geochemical data, we found little or no evidence for organisms capable of sulfide oxidation in the aphotic zone below the chemocline. Instead, comparison of functional genes below the chemocline are consistent with recovery of multiple populations capable of reducing oxidized sulfur. Our data support previous observations that at least some of the sulfide necessary to support the dense population of phototrophs in the chemocline is supplied from sulfate reduction in the hypolimnion and sediments. These studies provide key insights regarding the taxonomic and functional diversity within a euxinic environment and highlight the complexity of biogeochemical carbon and sulfur cycling necessary to maintain euxinia.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridia; DSR; Deltaproteobacteria; euxinia; meromictic; sulfate; sulfate reducing bacteria; sulfide
Year: 2016 PMID: 27199928 PMCID: PMC4846661 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00598
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Taxonomic affiliation of sequences in the metagenomes assigned at the phylum-level (except the Proteobacteria which are represented by class). Other indicates all phyla represented by < 5% of the total sequences in any metagenome. Data for 7 m are from Hamilton et al. (2014).
Figure 2Rank-abundance curves of EMIRGE 16S rRNA sequences and ribosomal protein S3 (rpS3) sequences from the 8 m and sediment metagenomes. The relative abundance of 16S rRNA genes was calculated with EMIRGE (Miller et al., 2011). The rank abundance curves for rpS3 sequences are based on average depth of coverage of the contig where each rpS3 sequence was encoded. Bars represent the sum of the relative abundance of taxonomic groups (at the phylum level except for Proteobacteria and Firmicutes which are summed at the class level).
Figure 3Phylogenetic classification of ribosomal protein S3 (rpS3) sequences affiliated with Deltaproteobacteria (A) and Clostridia (B). (A) Rank-abundance curve of Deltaproteobacterial ribosomal protein S3 (rpS3) sequences from the 8 m and sediment metagenomes classified at the order level. (B) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of rpS3 sequences affiliated with Clostridia recovered from the 8 m and sediment metagenomes and closely related sequences. Sequences recovered in the present study are in bold. NCBI accession numbers or IMG gene ids are shown in parentheses. Bootstrap support values based on 1000 bootstrap samplings >90 are noted. Cov = average depth of coverage of the contig containing the rpS3 sequence.
Figure 4The genetic potential for carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling at 8 m and in the sediments of Mahoney Lake. The genetic potential for each step was estimated using a combination of normalized marker gene ratios as previously described (Lauro et al., 2011). The marker genes for dissimilatory sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation (K00394, K00395, K00396) can operate in both sulfide oxidation and sulfate reduction. Therefore, they were assigned to sulfate reduction or sulfur oxidation based on the best match within KEGG. Sed, sediments. Marker genes are provided in Table S4.
Figure 5Maximum likelihood based phylogenetic 16S rRNA gene tree of closely related Deltaproteobacteria and the Deltaproteobacteria genomic bins from the 8 m metagenome (A) and the sediment metagenome (B). Bootstrap support values based on 1000 bootstrap samplings >90 are noted.
Figure 6Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 18 concatenated single-copy ribosomal proteins (Table . Bootstrap support values based on 1000 bootstrap samplings >90 are noted.
Statistics for the genome bins.
| Scaffolds | 93 | 58 | 143 | 70 | 35 |
| Longest scaffold (bp) | 168,842 | 200,011 | 205,602 | 218,332 | 335,466 |
| Total bp | 3,568,747 | 2,376,371 | 3,019,424 | 2,512,366 | 2,978,745 |
| N50 (bp) | 69,455 | 101,095 | 46,500 | 69,790 | 208,158 |
| G + C | 45.2 | 50.2 | 46.6 | 55.9 | 59.6 |
| Protein coding genes | 3112 | 3853 | 2272 | 2539 | 2726 |
| Average coverage | 27 | 23 | 12 | 21 | 31 |
| % complete | 98 | 98 | 96 | 98 | 98 |
Based on the presence of single copy marker genes (Table .
Figure 7Best BlastP hits for all predicted protein sequences in the Candidatus Aegiribacteria MLS_C genome. Other indicates all phyla represented by < 5% of the total sequences in the genome. The relative abundance of taxonomic groups is summed at the phylum level except for Proteobacteria and Firmicutes which are summed at the class level and Caldithrix which are summed at the genus level.
Figure 8Maximum likelihood based phylogenetic 16S rRNA gene tree of members of the FCB superphylum and MLS_C. Bootstrap support values based on 1000 bootstrap samplings >90 are noted. NCBI accession numbers or IMG gene ids are shown in parentheses.
Figure 9Hierarchical clustering of the relative abundance of COG categories (A) and the genetic potential for carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling in each assemblage at 7, 8 m, and in the sediments of Mahoney Lake (B). Values within each category are normalized across samples (see Section Materials and Methods). Clustering analyses is based on the normalized abundance profiles of COGs. The genetic potential for each step in (B) was estimated using a combination of normalized marker gene ratios as previously described (Lauro et al., 2011). Marker genes are provided in Table S4. The 7 m data set is from Hamilton et al. (2014). Sed, Sediment; A, RNA processing and modification; B, chromatin structure and dynamics; C, energy production and conversion; D, cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; E, amino-acid transport and metabolism; F, nucleotide transport and metabolism; G, carbohydrate transport and metabolism; H, coenzyme transport and metabolism; I, lipid transport and metabolism; J, translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis; K, transcription; L, replication, recombination, and repair; M, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N, cell motility; O, post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones; P, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; and Q, secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; R, general function prediction only; S, function unknown; T, signal transduction mechanisms; U, intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; W, extracellular structures; X, nuclear structure; V, defense mechanisms; Z, cytoskeleton.