| Literature DB >> 31787952 |
Mengyuan Shen1,2, Qi Li1, Minglei Ren3, Yan Lin1, Juanping Wang1, Li Chen4, Tao Li1, Jindong Zhao1,2,5.
Abstract
Microbes in various aquatic ecosystems play a key role in global energy fluxes and biogeochemical processes. However, the detailed patterns on the functional structure and the metabolic potential of microbial communities in freshwater lakes with different trophic status remain to be understood. We employed a metagenomics workflow to analyze the correlations between trophic status and planktonic microbiota in freshwater lakes on Yun-Gui Plateau, China. Our results revealed that microbial communities in the eutrophic and mesotrophic-oligotrophic lake ecosystems harbor distinct community structure and metabolic potential. Cyanobacteria were dominant in the eutrophic ecosystems, mainly driving the processes of aerobic respiration, fermentation, nitrogen assimilation, nitrogen mineralization, assimilatory sulfate reduction and sulfur mineralization in this ecosystem group. Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria (Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria), Verrucomicrobia and Planctomycetes, occurred more often in the mesotrophic-oligotrophic ecosystems than those in the eutrophic ecosystems, and these taxa potentially mediate the above metabolic processes. In these two groups of ecosystems, a difference in the abundance of functional genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, and metabolism of cofactors and vitamins significantly contribute to the distinct functional structure of microbiota from surface water. Furthermore, the microbe-mediated metabolic potentials for carbon, nitrogen and sulfur transformation showed differences in the two ecosystem groups. Compared with the mesotrophic-oligotrophic ecosystems, planktonic microbial communities in the eutrophic ecosystems showed higher potential for aerobic carbon fixation, fermentation, methanogenesis, anammox, denitrification, and sulfur mineralization, but they showed lower potential for aerobic respiration, CO oxidation, nitrogen fixation, and assimilatory sulfate reduction. This study offers insights into the relationships of trophic status to planktonic microbial community structure and its metabolic potential, and identifies the main taxa responsible for the biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur in freshwater lake environments.Entities:
Keywords: Cyanobacterial bloom; community structure; lake ecosystem; metabolic potential; metagenomics; planktonic microbiota; taxonomic diversity; trophic status
Year: 2019 PMID: 31787952 PMCID: PMC6853845 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Description of the samples used in this study.
| Physicochemical properties | Date | 20160618 | 20170925 | 20160607 | 20170924 | 20140614 | 20170721 | 20151210 | 20170924 | 20160518 | 20170812 |
| Location | 24.96°N | 24.95°N | 24.38°N | 24.36°N | 25.94°N | 25.90°N | 24.57°N | 24.38°N | 27.71°N | 27.71-27.73°N | |
| 102.65°E | 102.66°E | 102.78°E | 102.79°E | 100.16°E | 100.15°E | 102.89°E | 102.85°E | 100.78°E | 100.76-100.80°E | ||
| WT (°C) | 22.13 | 21.80 | 25.08 | 23.80 | 23.50 | 22.20 | 16.91 | 22.40 | 15.19 | 20.87 | |
| PH | 8.45 | 8.63 | 8.88 | 9.45 | 9.51 | 8.66 | 8.04 | 8.94 | 8.18 | 8.76 | |
| TP (mg/L) | 0.544 | 0.351 | 0.468 | 0.581 | 0.032∗ | 0.031 | 0.022 | 0.020 | 0.024 | 0.013 | |
| TN (mg/L) | 5.815 | 4.816 | 5.181 | 4.151 | 0.57∗ | 0.593 | 0.220 | 0.168 | 0.048 | <0.103 | |
| Geographic information# | Lake | Lake Dianchi | Lake Xingyun | Lake Erhai | Lake Fuxian | Lake Lugu | |||||
| Trophic status | Eutrophic | Eutrophic | Mesoeutrophic | Oligomesotrophic | Oligotrophic | ||||||
| Basin | The Yangtze River | The Pearl River | The Lancang River, Jinsha, and Yuanjiang Rivers | The Pearl River | The Yangtze River | ||||||
| Water level (m a.s.l.) | 1887.4 | 1722 | 1971 | 1721 | 2690.75 | ||||||
| Area (km2) | 308.6 | 34.7 | 249.8 | 211 | 48.25 | ||||||
| Average water depth (m) | 4.4 | 7 | 10.5 | 87 | 40.3 | ||||||
| Maximum depth(m) | 6 | 11 | 21.5 | 155 | 93.5 | ||||||
| Volume (108 m3) | 11.69 | 1.84 | 25.31 | 189 | 19.53 | ||||||
| Lake type | Shallow | Shallow | Shallow | Deep | Deep | ||||||
| Metagenomic survey | Clean data (Gbps) | 50.60 | 58.91 | 50.38 | 64.12 | 63.43 | 63.98 | 60.49 | 53.01 | 51.85 | 41.43 |
| Number of clean reads | 337,333,394 | 392,760,680 | 335,888,304 | 427,445,344 | 422,842,886 | 426,528,358 | 403,286,044 | 353,402,296 | 345,656,552 | 276,184,372 | |
| Number of contigs (>500 bps) | 2,381,193 | 2,318,367 | 3,929,297 | 3,368,043 | 1,604,121 | ||||||
| Number of predicted CDS | 3,775,712 | 3,059,812 | 6,560,747 | 5,229,770 | 2,840,196 | ||||||
| % Predicted CDS with taxonomic group assignment | 60.22 | 44.12 | 57.69 | 40.85 | 58.89 | ||||||
| % Predicted CDS with KOs assignment | 26.45 | 20.66 | 27.24 | 20.23 | 27.91 | ||||||
| Bacteria (%, based on reads from metagenomic data) | 23.31 | 33.11 | 14.66 | 41.15 | 13.65 | 18.79 | 19.69 | 12.55 | 22.61 | 28.97 | |
| Archaea (%, based on reads from metagenomic data) | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
| Viruses (%, based on reads from metagenomic data) | 0.74 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.39 | 0.11 | |
FIGURE 1Taxonomic structure and diversity of planktonic microbial communities in lakes exhibiting different trophic status. (A) The taxonomic structure across samples. The relative abundance of reads grouped at the phylum-level is shown for each metagenome library. Phyla with relative abundance not in the top ten are shown as “Other.” Hierarchical clustering (UPGMA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrices. See detailed information in Supplementary Table S4a. (B) PCoA based on complete taxonomic community profiles with 75% confidence ellipses (phylum-level taxonomic annotations). Significant clusters are indicated by dashed lines (PERMANOVA, 9999 permutations, P < 0.01). (C) Boxplots figure shows the range of different alpha diversity indices. The box represents the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile. See detailed information in Supplementary Table S3. (D) The extended error bar plot shows that phyla and orders significantly over−/−under-represented in Group I and Group II samples (see Supplementary Tables S5a,b). The difference in mean proportions and the corrected p-value of significance are also pointed out.
FIGURE 2Functional structure of planktonic microbial communities in lakes with different trophic status. (A) PCoA based on selected KOs involved in the metabolism pathway with 90% confidence ellipses. (B) Heatmap representing the functional clustering of the predicted CDS from the metagenomic data based on the KEGG categories of metabolism level 2. Hierarchical clustering (UPGMA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrices.
FIGURE 3Environmental drivers of community composition. (A) Pairwise comparisons of environmental factors are shown. The color gradients and box sizes represent Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and red indicates a positive correlation and blue indicates a negative correlation. Taxonomic and functional (based on metabolism KEGG modules) community composition are related to each environmental factor by Mantel tests. Line width corresponds to the Mantel’s r statistic for the corresponding distance correlations, and line color indicates the statistical significance based on 9999 permutations. (B) Redundancy analysis (RDA) is performed on the taxonomic profile (phylum level) and key environmental characteristics (WT, TN, TP, average water depth). Arrows indicate the correlation between environmental parameters and community structure. (C) Pearson’s correlations between all environmental factors and the relative abundances of the different metabolism categories (∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗p < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Distribution of KOs involved in C, N, S cycle transformations in samples collected along the five Yun-Gui Plateau lakes. The heatmap displays the relative abundance [log2(TPM + 1)] of KOs across all samples. Hierarchical clustering (UPGMA) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrices. KOs that differentially segregated across groups are identified by random forest analysis with Boruta feature selection (1000 runs > 4).
FIGURE 5Distribution of genes involved in the carbon, nitrogen and sulfur cycle. Genetic potential for several processes of the C, N, S cycle in the five Yun-Gui Plateau lakes using normalized marked genes. The genetic potentials for each conversion process are assessed based on the combination of these selected marker genes. For marker genes in the same process, the TPM values of genes with the same metabolic function are averaged, and the TPM values of genes with different metabolic functions are added. Arrow sizes are proportional to the genetic potential of the pathways (100% values of each cycle, see Supplementary Table S6). Dotted lines indicate that marked genes are rarely detected. Differences across trophic status are shown by z-score heatmap boxes indicated in each C/N/S transformation.