| Literature DB >> 27199850 |
Lingyu Wang1, Wenguo Zhao2, Xianghong Sun3, Rui Zheng3, Weina Qu3.
Abstract
Sina Weibo is a Twitter-like social networking site and one of the most popular microblogging services in China. This study aims to examine the factors that influence the intentions of users to continue using this site. This paper synthesizes the expectation confirmation model, constructs of habit and perceived critical mass, and the gender effect to construct a theoretical model to explain and predict these user intentions. The model is then tested via an online survey of 498 Sina Weibo users and partial least squares (PLS) modeling. The results indicate that the continuance intention of users is directly predicted by their perceived usefulness of the service (β = 0.299), their satisfaction (β = 0.208), and their habits (β = 0.389), which jointly explain 65.9% of the variance in intention. In addition to the effects of these predictors on the continuance intentions of Sina Weibo users, an assessment of the moderating effect of gender suggests that habit plays a more important role for females than for males in continuance intention, but perceived usefulness seems to be more important for males than for females. The implications of these findings are then discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Sina Weibo; continuance intention; expectation confirmation model; gender differences; microblogging
Year: 2016 PMID: 27199850 PMCID: PMC4850330 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Descriptive statistics on the respondents’ demographics.
| Demographics | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 189 | 38.0 |
| Female | 309 | 62.0 |
| High school or below | 152 | 30.5 |
| Junior college | 110 | 22.1 |
| Bachelor degree | 210 | 42.2 |
| Graduate degree | 26 | 5.2 |
| <21 | 206 | 41.4 |
| 21–25 | 190 | 38.1 |
| 26–30 | 72 | 14.5 |
| >30 | 30 | 6.0 |
Psychometric index of measurements.
| Constructs | Items | Loading | Standard error | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived usefulness | PU1 | 0.827 | 0.034 | 0.871 | 0.692 |
| PU2 | 0.850 | 0.026 | |||
| PU3 | 0.818 | 0.031 | |||
| Confirmation | CONF1 | 0.748 | 0.047 | 0.852 | 0.658 |
| CONF2 | 0.820 | 0.029 | |||
| CONF3 | 0.862 | 0.019 | |||
| Satisfaction | SAT1 | 0.857 | 0.024 | 0.895 | 0.740 |
| SAT2 | 0.837 | 0.028 | |||
| SAT3 | 0.886 | 0.019 | |||
| Habit | HABIT1 | 0.848 | 0.024 | 0.841 | 0.639 |
| HABIT2 | 0.730 | 0.038 | |||
| HABIT3 | 0.814 | 0.035 | |||
| Perceived critical mass | PCM1 | 0.811 | 0.029 | 0.896 | 0.683 |
| PCM2 | 0.785 | 0.043 | |||
| PCM3 | 0.860 | 0.024 | |||
| PCM4 | 0.848 | 0.028 | |||
| Continuance intention | CONTIN1 | 0.869 | 0.024 | 0.825 | 0.617 |
| CONTIN2 | 0.598 | 0.087 | |||
| CONTIN3 | 0.859 | 0.022 | |||
Correlations between constructs.
| PU | CONF | SAT | HABIT | PCM | CONTIN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived usefulness (PU) | 0.832 | |||||
| Confirmation (CONF) | 0.811 | 0.821 | ||||
| Satisfaction (SAT) | 0.723 | 0.684 | 0.860 | |||
| Habit (HABIT) | 0.755 | 0.735 | 0.672 | 0.799 | ||
| Perceived critical mass (PCM) | 0.567 | 0.601 | 0.512 | 0.635 | 0.826 | |
| Continuance intention (CONTIN) | 0.743 | 0.710 | 0.686 | 0.755 | 0.539 | 0.785 |
Effects on Sina Weibo usage continuance intention.
| Construct | Direct Effects | Indirect Effects | Total Effects |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived usefulness | 0.299 | – | 0.493 |
| 0.103 | |||
| 0.091 | |||
| Confirmation | – | – | 0.512 |
| 0.245 | |||
| 0.085 | |||
| 0.058 | |||
| 0.051 | |||
| 0.074 | |||
| Satisfaction | 0.208 | – | 0.391 |
| 0.183 | |||
| Habit | 0.389 | – | 0.389 |
| Perceived critical mass | – | – | 0.154 |
| 0.154 | |||
Moderating effect of gender.
| Hypotheses | Male | Female | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path coefficients | Path coefficients | ||||
| H1a (CONF-PU) | 0.843∗∗∗ | 0.022 | 0.805∗∗∗ | 0.025 | 1.049 |
| H1b (CONF-SAT) | 0.271∗∗ | 0.080 | 0.272∗∗ | 0.091 | 0.008 |
| H2a (PU-CONTIN) | 0.414∗∗∗ | 0.074 | 0.228∗∗ | 0.074 | 1.680† |
| H2b (PU-SAT) | 0.530∗∗∗ | 0.086 | 0.471∗∗∗ | 0.110 | 0.379 |
| H3a (SAT-CONTIN) | 0.210∗∗ | 0.066 | 0.219∗∗ | 0.064 | 0.093 |
| H3b (SAT-HABIT) | 0.528∗∗∗ | 0.058 | 0.412∗∗∗ | 0.073 | 1.120 |
| H4 (HABIT-CONTIN) | 0.268∗∗ | 0.077 | 0.485∗∗∗ | 0.062 | 2.184∗ |
| H5 (PCM-HABIT) | 0.394∗∗∗ | 0.056 | 0.399∗∗∗ | 0.069 | 0.051 |
Questionnaire items.
| Constructs | Item |
|---|---|
| Confirmation | CONF1: My experience with using Sina Weibo was better than what I expected. |
| CONF2: The service level provided by Sina Weibo was better than what I expected. | |
| CONF3: Overall, most of my expectations about using Sina Weibo were confirmed. | |
| Perceived Usefulness | PU1: Sina Weibo is beneficial for me. |
| PU2: The advantages of Sina Weibo outweigh the disadvantages. | |
| PU3: Overall, using Sina Weibo is advantageous. | |
| Satisfaction | How do you feel about your overall experience of Sina Weibo use: |
| SAT1: Very displeased/Very pleased | |
| SAT2: Very unconducive/Very conducive. | |
| SAT3: Very uninterested/Very interested. | |
| Habit | Habit1: Using Sina Weibo has become automatic to me. |
| Habit2: Using Sina Weibo is natural to me. | |
| Habit3: When faced with a particular task, using Sina Weibo is an obvious choice for me. | |
| Perceived critical mass | PCM1: Many people I communicate with use Sina Weibo. |
| PCM2: The people I communicate with will continue to use Sina Weibo in the future. | |
| PCM3: The people who I communicate with using Sina Weibo will continue to use Sina Weibo in the future. | |
| PCM4: Of the people who I communicate with regularly, many use Sina Weibo. | |
| IS continuance intention | CONTIN1: I intend to continue using Sina Weibo rather than discontinue using it. |
| CONTIN2: My intentions are to continue using Sina Weibo rather than using any alternative. | |
| CONTIN3: If I could, I would like to discontinue my use of Sina Weibo. | |