| Literature DB >> 27194922 |
Yun-Sang Choi1, Tae-Jun Jeong2, Ko-Eun Hwang2, Dong-Heon Song2, Youn-Kyung Ham2, Young-Boong Kim1, Ki-Hong Jeon1, Hyun-Wook Kim3, Cheon-Jei Kim2.
Abstract
This study was carried out to investigate the effects of refined, solar, and bamboo salt on the physico-chemical properties and sensory characteristics of cured pork loin. Moisture, protein, fat, and ash content, lightness, yellowness, cooking yield, and color, juiciness, and tenderness of sensory properties on curing pork loin exhibited no significant differences regardless of the nature of salts. The pH of raw and cooked cured pork loin with added bamboo salt was higher that of other salt treatments. However, the cooking loss, and Warner-Bratzler shear force of cured pork loin with added refined salt was lower than those of solar and bamboo salt pork loins cured. The flavor and overall acceptability scores of treatments with refined salt was higher than those of solar and bamboo salt treatments. The unique flavor of bamboo salt can render it as a functional material for marinating meat products. In addition, the results of this study reveal potential use of bamboo salt in meat curing.Entities:
Keywords: bamboo salt; curing meat; pork loin; refined salt; solar salt
Year: 2016 PMID: 27194922 PMCID: PMC4869540 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.2.152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Chemical and physical properties of various salts
| Parameters | Refined salt | Solar salt | Bamboo salt |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.54±0.02C | 7.93±0.03B | 10.71±0.02A |
| Moisture content (%) | 0.07±0.02B | 4.56±0.14A | 0.09±0.04B |
| Ash content (%) | 99.92±1.21A | 95.72±1.31B | 99.77±0.89A |
| CIE | 91.10±0.94C | 83.11±0.85B | 98.25±1.08A |
| CIE | −0.07±0.34 | −0.10±0.25 | −0.03±0.39 |
| CIE | 0.09±0.25B | −0.01±0.19B | 0.80±0.19A |
| Salinity (%) | 89.20±0.45A | 84.73±0.78B | 88.92±0.83A |
All values are mean±standard deviation of triplicates.
A-CMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Effect of various salts on proximate composition and salinity of cured pork loin
| Parameters | Refined salt | Solar salt | Bamboo salt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture (%) | 70.24±1.69 | 69.27±1.25 | 69.65±1.19 |
| Protein (%) | 21.21±0.79 | 21.31±1.04 | 21.19±1.11 |
| Fat (%) | 5.39±0.52 | 5.33±0.31 | 5.28±0.38 |
| Ash (%) | 2.53±0.14 | 2.69±0.15 | 2.81±0.19 |
| Salinity (%) | 3.25±0.21A | 2.89±0.18B | 3.00±0.21B |
All values are mean±standard deviation of triplicates.
A,BMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Effect of various salts on pH and color values of cured pork loin
| Parameters | Refined salt | Solar salt | Bamboo salt | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | pH | 5.95±0.02B | 5.94±0.03B | 6.01±0.02A |
| CIE | 57.27±1.35 | 58.90±1.66 | 56.97±1.08 | |
| CIE | 4.14±0.51AB | 3.96±0.87B | 4.98±0.54A | |
| CIE | 3.26±0.93B | 3.64±0.93B | 4.05±0.37A | |
| Cooked | pH | 6.25±0.03B | 6.17±0.21C | 6.43±0.02A |
| CIE | 78.79±0.53 | 78.75±0.26 | 78.24±1.14 | |
| CIE | 1.14±0.35A | 0.60±0.24B | 0.96±0.48AB | |
| CIE | 5.24±0.57AB | 4.97±0.65B | 5.88±0.49A | |
All values are mean±standard deviation of triplicates.
A-CMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Effect of various salts on curing yield, cooking loss, TBA value, and Warner-Bratzler shear force of cured pork loin
| Parameters | Refined salt | Solar salt | Bamboo salt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curing yield (%) | 103.89±0.89 | 102.31±1.15 | 102.78±0.91 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 7.71±0.95B | 8.41±0.68A | 8.26±0.52A |
| TBA (mg/ kg) | 0.09±0.04A | 0.07±0.03AB | 0.04±0.06B |
| Warner-Bratzler shear force (kg) | 4.46±0.78B | 5.95±0.15A | 5.67±0.73A |
All values are mean±standard deviation of triplicates.
A,BMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Effect of various salts on sensory characteristics of cured pork loin
| Parameters | Refined salt | Solar salt | Bamboo salt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color | 7.70±0.67 | 7.72±0.55 | 7.71±0.76 |
| Flavor | 7.44±0.73A | 7.01±0.60AB | 6.50±0.52B |
| Juiciness | 7.56±0.72 | 6.89±0.85 | 7.02±0.78 |
| Tenderness | 7.22±0.24 | 6.44±0.24 | 6.78±0.39 |
| Overall acceptability | 7.67±0.50A | 6.78±0.83B | 6.89±0.33B |
All values are mean±standard deviation of triplicates.
A,BMeans within a row with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05)