| Literature DB >> 32082604 |
Sol-Hee Lee1, Gye-Woong Kim1, Hack-Youn Kim1.
Abstract
Quality characteristics of chicken emulsion sausage manufactured with various levels of NaCl and 9 times heated bamboo salt (0.3%, 0.6%, 0.9%, and 1.2% respectively) were examined. The pH value of chicken emulsion sausage was increase tendency with increasing amount of bamboo salt, on the contrary in case of NaCl sample were decrease tendency with increasing amount of NaCl. Both before and after heating, redness of chicken emulsion sausage with bamboo salt treatments were upward trend with increasing amount of bamboo salt. water holding capacity (WHC) of 1.2% NaCl sample was significantly higher than 0.3%-0.9% (p < 0.05), but 0.9%, 1.2% bamboo salt samples were significantly higher than 0.3, 0.6 % (p < 0.05). Water loss of 1.2% NaCl and 0.9% bamboo salt samples were significantly lower than other treatment (p < 0.05). Protein solubility values significantly increased amount of bamboo salt and NaCl (p < 0.05), and samples of 0.9% NaCl and 0.6% bamboo salt values show similar values. Cooking yield of samples were increased tendency with increasing amount of NaCl and bamboo salt. Also viscosity values of sample containing 1.2% bamboo salt sample showed higher viscosity than other treatments. These results show that containing 1.2% NaCl chicken emulsion sausage and 0.9% bamboo salt chicken emulsion sausage were similar physicochemical properties. Therefore, bamboo salt is suitable for manufacturing chicken emulsion sausage. © Copyright 2020 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology.Entities:
Keywords: Bamboo salt; Chicken; Low-salt; NaCl; Sausage
Year: 2020 PMID: 32082604 PMCID: PMC7008125 DOI: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.1.103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
pH, color of chicken-breast sausage formulated with various levels of NaCl and bamboo salt
| Traits | NaCl (%) | Bamboo salt (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |||
| pH | Uncooked | 5.73 ± 0.02[ | 5.68 ± 0.02[ | 5.68 ± 0.01[ | 5.65 ± 0.02[ | 5.77 ± 0.01[ | 5.90 ± 0.02[ | 5.93 ± 0.02[ | 5.94 ± 0.09[ | |
| Cooked | 6.10 ± 0.04[ | 5.87 ± 0.02[ | 5.87 ± 0.03[ | 5.85 ± 0.16[ | 5.95 ± 0.04[ | 6.05 ± 0.03[ | 6.08 ± 0.02[ | 6.09 ± 0.01[ | ||
| Color | Uncooked | CIE L* | 70.68 ± 1.02[ | 68.86 ± 0.84[ | 68.86 ± 0.25[ | 68.70 ± 0.47[ | 69.20 ± 0.25[ | 67.76 ± 0.53[ | 69.20 ± 0.81[ | 72.8 ± 0.57[ |
| CIE a* | 3.77 ± 0.12[ | 3.73 ± 0.15[ | 3.67 ± 0.09[ | 3.62 ± 0.28[ | 3.45 ± 0.12[ | 3.55 ± 0.05[ | 3.77 ± 0.09[ | 4.32 ± 0.12[ | ||
| CIE b* | 15.4 ± 0.34[ | 15.9 ± 0.40[ | 15.6 ± 0.12[ | 15.5 ± 0.17[ | 16.5 ± 0.45[ | 15.6 ± 0.37[ | 15.9 ± 0.31[ | 15.2 ± 0.22[ | ||
| Cooked | CIE L* | 78.9 ± 0.40[ | 78.5 ± 0.45[ | 78.0 ± 0.09[ | 77.6 ± 1.04[ | 79.0 ± 0.80[ | 77.8 ± 1.07[ | 78.0 ± 0.28[ | 78.0 ± 0.53[ | |
| CIE a* | 3.55 ± 0.1[ | 3.65 ± 0.19[ | 3.72 ± 0.09[ | 4.00 ± 0.21[ | 3.67 ± 0.09[ | 4.00 ± 0.21[ | 4.20 ± 0.52[ | 4.17 ± 0.25[ | ||
| CIE b* | 14.5 ± 0.17[ | 14.3 ± 0.18[ | 14.9 ± 0.39[ | 14.0 ± 0.21[ | 13.8 ± 0.17[ | 13.4 ± 0.34[ | 13.3 ± 0.35[ | 13.3 ± 0.19[ | ||
All values are mean ± SD.
Mean in the all treatment with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
WHC and emulsion stability of chicken-breast sausage formulated with various levels of NaCl and bamboo salt
| Traits | NaCl (%) | Bamboo salt (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | ||
| WHC (%) | 67.88 ± 0.74[ | 69.96 ± 1.35[ | 70.55 ± 1.90[ | 71.40 ± 0.43[ | 69.28 ± 1.28[ | 68.41 ± 0.25[ | 76.56 ± 0.41[ | 81.37 ± 1.30[ | |
| Emulsion stability (%) | Water loss (%) | 12.45 ± 0.87[ | 7.24 ± 0.56[ | 6.22 ± 0.50[ | 5.30 ± 0.29[ | 8.35 ± 0.62[ | 6.92 ± 0.15[ | 5.46 ± 0.29[ | 4.64 ± 0.34[ |
| Fat loss (%) | 0.47 ± 0.19[ | 0.26 ± 0.13[ | 0.12 ± 0.12[ | 0.04 ± 0.03[ | 0.38 ± 0.10[ | 0.20 ± 0.06[ | 0.11 ± 0.10[ | 0.03 ± 0.02[ | |
All values are mean ± SD.
Mean in the all treatment with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
WHC, water holding capacity.
Protein solubility of chicken-breast sausage formulated with various levels of NaCl and bamboo salt
| Traits | NaCl (%) | Bamboo salt (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |
| Total protein (μg/μL) | 1,053.66 ± 0.49[ | 1,063.18 ± 0.49[ | 1,248.70 ± 0.49[ | 1,249.56 ± 0.49[ | 1,009.52 ± 0.99[ | 1,185.51 ± 0.49[ | 1,344.49 ± 0.49[ | 1,395.26 ± 0.86[ |
| Myofibilla protein (μg/μL) | 807.27 ± 0.49[ | 836.12 ± 0.86[ | 1,018.75 ± 0.86[ | 1,028.27 ± 0.86[ | 785.92 ± 1.32[ | 961.91 ± 0.99[ | 1,106.75 ± 0.86[ | 1,151.47 ± 0.99[ |
| Sarcoplasmic protein (μg/ μL) | 246.39 ± 0.50[ | 227.06 ± 0.50[ | 229.95 ± 0.49[ | 221.29 ± 0.49[ | 223.60 ± 0.39[ | 223.74 ± 0.45[ | 237.74 ± 0.45[ | 243.80 ± 0.49[ |
All values are mean ± SD.
Mean in the all treatment with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fig. 1.Cooking yield of chicken-breast sausage formulated with various levels of NaCl and bamboo salt.
a,bMean in the all treatment bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2.Change of apparent viscosity on chicken-breast sausage formulated with various levels of NaCl and bamboo salt.
N1, sausage with 0.3% NaCl; N2, sausage with 0.6% NaCl; N3, sausage with 0.9% NaCl; N4, sausage with 1.2% NaCl; B1, sausage with 0.3% bamboo salt; B2, sausage with 0.6% bamboo salt; B3, sausage with 0.9% bamboo salt; B4, sausage with 1.2% bamboo salt.
Texture properties analysis of chicken-breast sausage formulated with various levels of NaCl and bamboo salt
| Traits | NaCl (%) | Bamboo salt (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |
| Hardness (kgf) | 4.54 ± 0.34[ | 5.44 ± 0.35[ | 5.86 ± 0.30[ | 6.32 ± 0.30[ | 5.44 ± 0.36[ | 5.84 ± 0.37[ | 5.91 ± 0.61[ | 6.34 ± 0.44[ |
| Springness | 0.83 ± 0.06[ | 0.79 ± 0.06[ | 0.82 ± 0.08[ | 0.81 ± 0.01[ | 0.75 ± 0.11[ | 0.78 ± 0.06[ | 0.82 ± 0.06[ | 0.73 ± 0.03[ |
| Cohesiveness | 0.47 ± 0.03[ | 0.50 ± 0.08[ | 0.49 ± 0.08[ | 0.50 ± 0.04[ | 0.45 ± 0.09[ | 0.51 ± 0.05[ | 0.54 ± 0.08[ | 0.47 ± 0.05[ |
| Gumminess (kgf) | 2.16 ± 0.18[ | 2.78 ± 0.58[ | 2.91 ± 0.49[ | 3.19 ± 0.37[ | 2.46 ± 0.54[ | 3.01 ± 0.48[ | 3.18 ± 0.38[ | 3.00 ± 0.45[ |
| Chewiness (kgf) | 1.79 ± 0.17[ | 2.22 ± 0.58[ | 2.44 ± 0.62[ | 2.59 ± 0.33[ | 1.90 ± 0.62[ | 2.36 ± 0.51[ | 2.63 ± 0.46[ | 2.22 ± 0.41[ |
All values are mean ± SD.
Mean in the all treatment with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).