Literature DB >> 27194481

Model inversion via multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization: a new paradigm for parameter estimation in haemodynamics, and beyond.

Paris Perdikaris1, George Em Karniadakis2.   

Abstract

We present a computational framework for model inversion based on multi-fidelity information fusion and Bayesian optimization. The proposed methodology targets the accurate construction of response surfaces in parameter space, and the efficient pursuit to identify global optima while keeping the number of expensive function evaluations at a minimum. We train families of correlated surrogates on available data using Gaussian processes and auto-regressive stochastic schemes, and exploit the resulting predictive posterior distributions within a Bayesian optimization setting. This enables a smart adaptive sampling procedure that uses the predictive posterior variance to balance the exploration versus exploitation trade-off, and is a key enabler for practical computations under limited budgets. The effectiveness of the proposed framework is tested on three parameter estimation problems. The first two involve the calibration of outflow boundary conditions of blood flow simulations in arterial bifurcations using multi-fidelity realizations of one- and three-dimensional models, whereas the last one aims to identify the forcing term that generated a particular solution to an elliptic partial differential equation.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Bayesian optimization; blood flow simulations; inverse problems; machine learning; multi-fidelity modelling; outflow conditions

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27194481      PMCID: PMC4892258          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.1107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  12 in total

1.  Infinite number of solutions to the hemodynamic inverse problem.

Authors:  C M Quick; W L Young; A Noordergraaf
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 2.  Blood viscosity in tube flow: dependence on diameter and hematocrit.

Authors:  A R Pries; D Neuhaus; P Gaehtgens
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-12

3.  Identification of vascular territory resistances in one-dimensional hemodynamics simulations.

Authors:  P J Blanco; S M Watanabe; R A Feijóo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Modeling blood flow circulation in intracranial arterial networks: a comparative 3D/1D simulation study.

Authors:  L Grinberg; E Cheever; T Anor; J R Madsen; G E Karniadakis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Multi-fidelity modelling via recursive co-kriging and Gaussian-Markov random fields.

Authors:  P Perdikaris; D Venturi; J O Royset; G E Karniadakis
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Outflow boundary conditions for arterial networks with multiple outlets.

Authors:  Leopold Grinberg; George Em Karniadakis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Inverse problems in 1D hemodynamics on systemic networks: a sequential approach.

Authors:  D Lombardi
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Sequential parameter estimation for fluid-structure problems: application to hemodynamics.

Authors:  Cristóbal Bertoglio; Philippe Moireau; Jean-Frederic Gerbeau
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Fractional-order viscoelasticity in one-dimensional blood flow models.

Authors:  Paris Perdikaris; George Em Karniadakis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Validation of a patient-specific one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree.

Authors:  Philippe Reymond; Yvette Bohraus; Fabienne Perren; Francois Lazeyras; Nikos Stergiopulos
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.733

View more
  15 in total

1.  Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling.

Authors:  P Perdikaris; M Raissi; A Damianou; N D Lawrence; G E Karniadakis
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Bayesian optimisation for efficient parameter inference in a cardiac mechanics model of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Agnieszka Borowska; Hao Gao; Alan Lazarus; Dirk Husmeier
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.648

3.  Propagation of uncertainty in the mechanical and biological response of growing tissues using multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression.

Authors:  Taeksang Lee; Ilias Bilionis; Adrian Buganza Tepole
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.756

Review 4.  A Contemporary Look at Biomechanical Models of Myocardium.

Authors:  Reza Avazmohammadi; João S Soares; David S Li; Samarth S Raut; Robert C Gorman; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Inverse problems in reduced order models of cardiovascular haemodynamics: aspects of data assimilation and heart rate variability.

Authors:  Sanjay Pant; Chiara Corsini; Catriona Baker; Tain-Yen Hsia; Giancarlo Pennati; Irene E Vignon-Clementel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Multiscale modeling meets machine learning: What can we learn?

Authors:  Grace C Y Peng; Mark Alber; Adrian Buganza Tepole; William R Cannon; Suvranu De; Salvador Dura-Bernal; Krishna Garikipati; George Karniadakis; William W Lytton; Paris Perdikaris; Linda Petzold; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Arch Comput Methods Eng       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 7.302

7.  Machine learning approaches to surrogate multifidelity Growth and Remodeling models for efficient abdominal aortic aneurysmal applications.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Jiang; Jongeun Choi; Seungik Baek
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.698

8.  Improving reconstructive surgery design using Gaussian process surrogates to capture material behavior uncertainty.

Authors:  Casey Stowers; Taeksang Lee; Ilias Bilionis; Arun K Gosain; Adrian Buganza Tepole
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-02-09

9.  An optimal control approach to determine resistance-type boundary conditions from in-vivo data for cardiovascular simulations.

Authors:  Elisa Fevola; Francesco Ballarin; Laura Jiménez-Juan; Stephen Fremes; Stefano Grivet-Talocia; Gianluigi Rozza; Piero Triverio
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 2.648

10.  Computer-Aided Whole-Cell Design: Taking a Holistic Approach by Integrating Synthetic With Systems Biology.

Authors:  Lucia Marucci; Matteo Barberis; Jonathan Karr; Oliver Ray; Paul R Race; Miguel de Souza Andrade; Claire Grierson; Stefan Andreas Hoffmann; Sophie Landon; Elibio Rech; Joshua Rees-Garbutt; Richard Seabrook; William Shaw; Christopher Woods
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.