Literature DB >> 33756416

Improving reconstructive surgery design using Gaussian process surrogates to capture material behavior uncertainty.

Casey Stowers1, Taeksang Lee1, Ilias Bilionis1, Arun K Gosain2, Adrian Buganza Tepole3.   

Abstract

To produce functional, aesthetically natural results, reconstructive surgeries must be planned to minimize stress as excessive loads near wounds have been shown to produce pathological scarring and other complications (Gurtner et al., 2011). Presently, stress cannot easily be measured in the operating room. Consequently, surgeons rely on intuition and experience (Paul et al., 2016; Buchanan et al., 2016). Predictive computational tools are ideal candidates for surgery planning. Finite element (FE) simulations have shown promise in predicting stress fields on large skin patches and in complex cases, helping to identify potential regions of complication. Unfortunately, these simulations are computationally expensive and deterministic (Lee et al., 2018a). However, running a few, well selected FE simulations allows us to create Gaussian process (GP) surrogate models of local cutaneous flaps that are computationally efficient and able to predict stress and strain for arbitrary material parameters. Here, we create GP surrogates for the advancement, rotation, and transposition flaps. We then use the predictive capability of these surrogates to perform a global sensitivity analysis, ultimately showing that fiber direction has the most significant impact on strain field variations. We then perform an optimization to determine the optimal fiber direction for each flap for three different objectives driven by clinical guidelines (Leedy et al., 2005; Rohrer and Bhatia, 2005). While material properties are not controlled by the surgeon and are actually a source of uncertainty, the surgeon can in fact control the orientation of the flap with respect to the skin's relaxed tension lines, which are associated with the underlying fiber orientation (Borges, 1984). Therefore, fiber direction is the only material parameter that can be optimized clinically. The optimization task relies on the efficiency of the GP surrogates to calculate the expected cost of different strategies when the uncertainty of other material parameters is included. We propose optimal flap orientations for the three cost functions and that can help in reducing stress resulting from the surgery and ultimately reduce complications associated with excessive mechanical loading near wounds.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Local flaps; Machine learning; Nonlinear finite elements; Skin biomechanics; Soft tissue mechanics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33756416      PMCID: PMC8087634          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  55 in total

1.  Automated estimation of collagen fibre dispersion in the dermis and its contribution to the anisotropic behaviour of skin.

Authors:  Aisling Ní Annaidh; Karine Bruyère; Michel Destrade; Michael D Gilchrist; Corrado Maurini; Melanie Otténio; Giuseppe Saccomandi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Estimating material parameters of a structurally based constitutive relation for skin mechanics.

Authors:  Jessica W Y Jor; Martyn P Nash; Poul M F Nielsen; Peter J Hunter
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2010-11-25

3.  Mechanical properties of human skin in vivo: a comparative evaluation in 300 men and women.

Authors:  S Luebberding; N Krueger; M Kerscher
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  From the rhombic transposition flap toward Z-plasty: An optimized design using the finite element method.

Authors:  Amirhossein Rajabi; Allan T Dolovich; J D Johnston
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Suction based mechanical characterization of superficial facial soft tissues.

Authors:  J Weickenmeier; M Jabareen; E Mazza
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Relaxed skin tension lines (RSTL) versus other skin lines.

Authors:  A F Borges
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Mechanical response of human female breast skin under uniaxial stretching.

Authors:  N Kumaraswamy; Hamed Khatam; Gregory P Reece; Michelle C Fingeret; Mia K Markey; Krishnaswamy Ravi-Chandar
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-05-19

8.  Refinements of tissue expansion for pediatric forehead reconstruction: a 13-year experience.

Authors:  Arun K Gosain; Christopher G Zochowski; Wilberto Cortes
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck II: surgical treatment and reconstruction.

Authors:  Norman N Ge; John F McGuire; Senait Dyson; Davin Chark
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Computational modeling of skin: Using stress profiles as predictor for tissue necrosis in reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Adrián Buganza Tepole; Arun K Gosain; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Comput Struct       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.