Literature DB >> 27193477

Is a computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing method for mandibular reconstruction economically viable?

Achille Tarsitano1, Salvatore Battaglia2, Salvatore Crimi3, Leonardo Ciocca4, Roberto Scotti4, Claudio Marchetti2.   

Abstract

The design and manufacture of patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plates, particularly in combination with cutting guides, has created many new opportunities for the planning and implementation of mandibular reconstruction. Although this surgical method is being used more widely and the outcomes appear to be improved, the question of the additional cost has to be discussed. To evaluate the cost generated by the management of this technology, we studied a cohort of patients treated for mandibular neoplasms. The population was divided into two groups of 20 patients each who were undergoing a 'traditional' freehand mandibular reconstruction or a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) mandibular reconstruction. Data concerning operation time, complications, and days of hospitalisation were used to evaluate costs related to the management of these patients. The mean operating time for the CAD-CAM group was 435 min, whereas that for the freehand group was 550.5 min. The total difference in terms of average time gain was 115.5 min. No microvascular complication occurred in the CAD-CAM group; two complications (10%) were observed in patients undergoing freehand reconstructions. The mean overall lengths of hospital stay were 13.8 days for the CAD-CAM group and 17 days for the freehand group. Finally, considering that the institutional cost per minute of theatre time is €30, the money saved as a result of the time gained was €3,450. This cost corresponds approximately to the total price of the CAD-CAM surgery. In conclusion, we believe that CAD-CAM technology for mandibular reconstruction will become a widely used reconstructive method and that its cost will be covered by gains in terms of surgical time, quality of reconstruction, and reduced complications.
Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided design; Computer-aided manufacturing; Cost; Mandibular reconstruction; Reconstructive surgery; Surgical time

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27193477     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  7 in total

1.  Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen.

Authors:  Jan J Lang; Mirjam Bastian; Peter Foehr; Michael Seebach; Jochen Weitz; Constantin von Deimling; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Carina M Micheler; Nikolas J Wilhelm; Christian U Grosse; Marco Kesting; Rainer Burgkart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  In-House, Open-Source 3D-Software-Based, CAD/CAM-Planned Mandibular Reconstructions in 20 Consecutive Free Fibula Flap Cases: An Explorative Cross-Sectional Study With Three-Dimensional Performance Analysis.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Paul Kilbertus; Florian D Grill; Matthias Schwarz; Jochen Weitz; Markus Nieberler; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Andreas M Fichter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Comparing the use of conventional and three-dimensional printing (3DP) in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Ailis Truscott; Reza Zamani; Mohammad Akrami
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of Fibula Free Flaps: A Retrospective Comparison of CAD/CAM versus Conventional Technique.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Rodríguez-Arias; Blanca Tapia; Marta María Pampín; Maria José Morán; Javier Gonzalez; Maria Barajas; Jose Luis Del Castillo; Carlos Navarro Cuéllar; Jose Luis Cebrian
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-07

5.  Vascularized Fibula TMJ Reconstruction: A Report of Five Cases featuring Computerized Patient-specific Surgical Planning.

Authors:  David B Powers; John Breeze; Detlev Erdmann
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-08-18

6.  Time is crucial in malignant tumor cases: Speeding up the process of patient-specific implant creation.

Authors:  Simon Spalthoff; Narin Nejati-Rad; Björn Rahlf; Philipp Jehn; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Fritjof Lentge; Philippe Korn
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Mandibular reconstruction using a new design for a patient-specific plate to support a fibular free flap and avoid double-barrel technique.

Authors:  Achille Tarsitano; Salvatore Battaglia; Giuseppe Corinaldesi; Claudio Marchetti; Gerardo Pellegrino; Leonardo Ciocca
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.124

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.