Literature DB >> 27191224

Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) as a Source of Microplastics in the Aquatic Environment.

Fionn Murphy1, Ciaran Ewins2, Frederic Carbonnier3, Brian Quinn1.   

Abstract

Municipal effluent discharged from wastewater treatment works (WwTW) is suspected to be a significant contributor of microplastics (MP) to the environment as many personal care products contain plastic microbeads. A secondary WwTW (population equivalent 650 000) was sampled for microplastics at different stages of the treatment process to ascertain at what stage in the treatment process the MP are being removed. The influent contained on average 15.70 (±5.23) MP·L(-1). This was reduced to 0.25 (±0.04) MP·L(-1) in the final effluent, a decrease of 98.41%. Despite this large reduction we calculate that this WwTW is releasing 65 million microplastics into the receiving water every day. A significant proportion of the microplastic accumulated in and was removed during the grease removal stage (19.67 (±4.51) MP/2.5 g), it was only in the grease that the much publicised microbeads were found. This study shows that despite the efficient removal rates of MP achieved by this modern treatment plant when dealing with such a large volume of effluent even a modest amount of microplastics being released per liter of effluent could result in significant amounts of microplastics entering the environment. This is the first study to describe in detail the fate of microplastics during the wastewater treatment process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27191224     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  61 in total

1.  Removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm-125 μm) during drinking water treatment.

Authors:  Yongli Zhang; Allison Diehl; Ashton Lewandowski; Kishore Gopalakrishnan; Tracie Baker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  The occurrence of microplastic contamination in littoral sediments of the Persian Gulf, Iran.

Authors:  Abolfazl Naji; Zinat Esmaili; Sherri A Mason; A Dick Vethaak
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Microfibers: a preliminary discussion on their definition and sources.

Authors:  Jianli Liu; Yunfei Yang; Jiannan Ding; Bo Zhu; Weidong Gao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Release of polyester and cotton fibers from textiles in machine washings.

Authors:  Markus Sillanpää; Pirjo Sainio
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Occurrence, sources, human health impacts and mitigation of microplastic pollution.

Authors:  Samaneh Karbalaei; Parichehr Hanachi; Tony R Walker; Matthew Cole
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Raman microspectroscopic identification of microplastic particles in freshwater bivalves (Unio pictorum) exposed to sewage treatment plant effluents under different exposure scenarios.

Authors:  Janina Domogalla-Urbansky; Philipp M Anger; Hermann Ferling; Florian Rager; Alexandra C Wiesheu; Reinhard Niessner; Natalia P Ivleva; Julia Schwaiger
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Characterisation of "flushable" and "non-flushable" commercial wet wipes using microRaman, FTIR spectroscopy and fluorescence microscopy: to flush or not to flush.

Authors:  Leonardo Pantoja Munoz; Alejandra Gonzalez Baez; Deena McKinney; Hemda Garelick
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.

Authors:  Quinn T Birch; Phillip M Potter; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 8.044

9.  Variation in the presence and abundance of anthropogenic microfibers in the Cumberland River in Nashville, TN, USA.

Authors:  Lina Said; Matthew J Heard
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Microplastics in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Turkey: a comparison of the influent and secondary effluent concentrations.

Authors:  Sedat Gündoğdu; Cem Çevik; Evşen Güzel; Serdar Kilercioğlu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.