Literature DB >> 32325555

Removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm-125 μm) during drinking water treatment.

Yongli Zhang1, Allison Diehl2, Ashton Lewandowski3, Kishore Gopalakrishnan2, Tracie Baker4.   

Abstract

This study investigated the removal efficiency of micro- and nanoplastics (180 nm-125 μm) during drinking water treatment, particularly coagulation/flocculation combined with sedimentation (CFS) and granular filtration under ordinary working conditions at water treatment plants (WTPs). It also studied the interactions between biofilms and microplastics and the consequential impact on treatment efficiency. Generally, CFS was not sufficient to remove micro- and nanoplastics. The sedimentation rate of clean plastics was lower than 2.0% for all different sizes of plastic particles with coagulant Al2(SO4)3. Even with the addition of coagulant aid (PolyDADMAC), the highest removal was only 13.6% for 45-53 μm of particles. In contrast, granular filtration was much more effective at filtering out micro- and nanoplastics, from 86.9% to nearly complete removal (99.9% for particles larger than 100 μm). However, there existed a critical size (10-20 μm) where a significant lower removal (86.9%) was observed. Biofilms were easily formed on microplastics. In addition, biofilm formation significantly increased the removal efficiency of CFS treatment from <2.0% to 16.5%. This work provides new knowledge to better understand the fate and transport of emerging micro- and nanoplastic pollutants during drinking water treatment, which is of increasing concern due to the potential human exposure to micro- and nanoplastics in drinking water.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Coagulation/flocculation/sedimentation; Filtration; Micro-and nanoplastics; Water treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32325555      PMCID: PMC7241221          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  29 in total

1.  Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Steve A Carr; Jin Liu; Arnold G Tesoro
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Abundance, size and polymer composition of marine microplastics ≥10μm in the Atlantic Ocean and their modelled vertical distribution.

Authors:  Kristina Enders; Robin Lenz; Colin A Stedmon; Torkel G Nielsen
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Particle Detachment in Deep Bed Filtration

Authors: 
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 8.128

4.  Microplastics in four estuarine rivers in the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A.

Authors:  Lance T Yonkos; Elizabeth A Friedel; Ana C Perez-Reyes; Sutapa Ghosal; Courtney D Arthur
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs.

Authors:  Dafne Eerkes-Medrano; Richard C Thompson; David C Aldridge
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 6.  Microplastics in drinking water treatment - Current knowledge and research needs.

Authors:  Katerina Novotna; Lenka Cermakova; Lenka Pivokonska; Tomas Cajthaml; Martin Pivokonsky
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  The plastic in microplastics: A review.

Authors:  Anthony L Andrady
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.553

8.  Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris.

Authors:  Nanna B Hartmann; Thorsten Hüffer; Richard C Thompson; Martin Hassellöv; Anja Verschoor; Anders E Daugaard; Sinja Rist; Therese Karlsson; Nicole Brennholt; Matthew Cole; Maria P Herrling; Maren C Hess; Natalia P Ivleva; Amy L Lusher; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Microplastic pollution in the Greenland Sea: Background levels and selective contamination of planktivorous diving seabirds.

Authors:  F Amélineau; D Bonnet; O Heitz; V Mortreux; A M A Harding; N Karnovsky; W Walkusz; J Fort; D Grémillet
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Microplastic interactions with freshwater microalgae: Hetero-aggregation and changes in plastic density appear strongly dependent on polymer type.

Authors:  Fabienne Lagarde; Ophélie Olivier; Marie Zanella; Philippe Daniel; Sophie Hiard; Aurore Caruso
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  4 in total

1.  Upcycling Glass Waste into Porous Microspheres for Wastewater Treatment Applications: Efficacy of Dye Removal.

Authors:  Sabrin A Samad; Abul Arafat; Edward Lester; Ifty Ahmed
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  In Vitro High-Throughput Toxicological Assessment of Nanoplastics.

Authors:  Valentina Tolardo; Davide Magrì; Francesco Fumagalli; Domenico Cassano; Athanassia Athanassiou; Despina Fragouli; Sabrina Gioria
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Microplastics in the environment: Occurrence, perils, and eradication.

Authors:  Surbhi Sharma; Soumen Basu; Nagaraj P Shetti; Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda; Tejraj M Aminabhavi
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 13.273

4.  Adsorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using a zero-valent iron material modified by the ionic liquid [Hmim]SbF6.

Authors:  Fenghui Wu; Chenyang Zhao; Guangfei Qu; Zhoupeng Yan; Yingda Zeng; Bangjin Chen; Yinghui Hu; Wei Ji; Yingli Li; Huimin Tang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.361

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.