Literature DB >> 32077019

Variation in the presence and abundance of anthropogenic microfibers in the Cumberland River in Nashville, TN, USA.

Lina Said1, Matthew J Heard2.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic microfibers (thread-like pieces of litter < 5 mm in size) including microplastic fibers have been suggested to pose a growing threat to urban rivers across the world. However, in most urban rivers, we have a limited understanding of how anthropogenic microfibers vary in presence and abundance over time. In this study, we examined how the presence and abundance of anthropogenic microfibers varied in the Cumberland River in Nashville, TN, a growing city with more than one million residents. To measure anthropogenic microfibers, we collected grab samples of surface water weekly from three locations along the Cumberland River in Nashville, TN (one upstream of the city, one in downtown, and one downstream of the city), over a 7-week period in summer of 2018 (n = 151 total samples). We found that anthropogenic microfibers were present at all study sites over time (mean of all samples = 27.9 microfibers/L) and that the mean abundance of anthropogenic microfibers significantly increased in the city and downstream of the city relative to our upstream collection site. In addition, we found that anthropogenic microfiber abundance was significantly variable over time (sample values ranged from 0 to 195 pieces/L) and that multiple factors including the presence of wastewater treatment plants may be contributing to the abundance and distribution of anthropogenic microfibers in this urban river.

Keywords:  Freshwater; Microfibers; Microplastic; Pollution; Urban river

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32077019     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08091-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  23 in total

Review 1.  Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs.

Authors:  Dafne Eerkes-Medrano; Richard C Thompson; David C Aldridge
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Abundant plankton-sized microplastic particles in shelf waters of the northern Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Rosana Di Mauro; Matthew J Kupchik; Mark C Benfield
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Mountains to the sea: River study of plastic and non-plastic microfiber pollution in the northeast USA.

Authors:  Rachael Z Miller; Andrew J R Watts; Brooke O Winslow; Tamara S Galloway; Abigail P W Barrows
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity.

Authors:  Andrea J Reid; Andrew K Carlson; Irena F Creed; Erika J Eliason; Peter A Gell; Pieter T J Johnson; Karen A Kidd; Tyson J MacCormack; Julian D Olden; Steve J Ormerod; John P Smol; William W Taylor; Klement Tockner; Jesse C Vermaire; David Dudgeon; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2018-11-22

5.  Influence of wastewater treatment plant discharges on microplastic concentrations in surface water.

Authors:  Shirin Estahbanati; N L Fahrenfeld
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-08-07       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Marine microplastics spell big problems for future generations.

Authors:  Tamara S Galloway; Ceri N Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Microplastics research-from sink to source.

Authors:  Chelsea M Rochman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Microplastic pollution increases gene exchange in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Maria Arias-Andres; Uli Klümper; Keilor Rojas-Jimenez; Hans-Peter Grossart
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  When Microplastic Is Not Plastic: The Ingestion of Artificial Cellulose Fibers by Macrofauna Living in Seagrass Macrophytodetritus.

Authors:  François Remy; France Collard; Bernard Gilbert; Philippe Compère; Gauthier Eppe; Gilles Lepoint
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Microplastics profile along the Rhine River.

Authors:  Thomas Mani; Armin Hauk; Ulrich Walter; Patricia Burkhardt-Holm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of the polyester clothing value chain to identify key intervention points for sustainability.

Authors:  Cristina Palacios-Mateo; Yvonne van der Meer; Gunnar Seide
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.481

2.  Microplastics Environmental Effect and Risk Assessment on the Aquaculture Systems from South China.

Authors:  Yizheng Li; Guanglong Chen; Kaihang Xu; Kai Huang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Plastic microfibre pollution: how important is clothes' laundering?

Authors:  Christine Gaylarde; Jose Antonio Baptista-Neto; Estefan Monteiro da Fonseca
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-05-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.