Paul Hanly1, Rebecca Maguire2, Myles Balfe3, Philip Hyland2, Aileen Timmons3, Eleanor O'Sullivan4, Phyllis Butow5, Linda Sharp6. 1. National College of Ireland, Mayor Street, Dublin 1, Ireland. paul.hanly@ncirl.ie. 2. National College of Ireland, Mayor Street, Dublin 1, Ireland. 3. National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland. 4. University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 5. University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 6. Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between unmet supportive care needs and carer burden and happiness, in head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Two hundred eighty-five HNC informal carers were sent a postal questionnaire between January and June 2014, which included the supportive care needs survey for partners and caregivers of cancer survivors (SCNS-P&C) and the CarerQol, which assesses burden and happiness. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the association of (i) carer characteristics, (ii) carer situation, and (iii) unmet supportive care needs, with carer burden and happiness RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven carers completed the questionnaire (response rate = 69 %), 180 of whom were included in the analysis. The majority were female (76 %), not in paid employment (68 %) and caring for their spouse (67 %). On average, carers reported relatively low levels of burden and relatively high levels of happiness. Carer factors explained 42 % of variance in levels of burden and 24 % of variance in levels of happiness. Healthcare service needs were associated with carer burden (β = .28, p = .04), while psychological needs (β = -.38, p = .028), health care service needs (β = -.30, p = .049), information needs (β = .29, p = .028), carer comorbidity (β = -.18, p = .030), and gender (β = -.16, p = .045) were associated with happiness. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that different aspects of carer characteristics and unmet needs are associated with carer burden and happiness. Efforts directed at reducing unmet healthcare service needs in particular are merited given their associations with both aspects of carer quality of life.
PURPOSE: Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between unmet supportive care needs and carer burden and happiness, in head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Two hundred eighty-five HNC informal carers were sent a postal questionnaire between January and June 2014, which included the supportive care needs survey for partners and caregivers of cancer survivors (SCNS-P&C) and the CarerQol, which assesses burden and happiness. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the association of (i) carer characteristics, (ii) carer situation, and (iii) unmet supportive care needs, with carer burden and happiness RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven carers completed the questionnaire (response rate = 69 %), 180 of whom were included in the analysis. The majority were female (76 %), not in paid employment (68 %) and caring for their spouse (67 %). On average, carers reported relatively low levels of burden and relatively high levels of happiness. Carer factors explained 42 % of variance in levels of burden and 24 % of variance in levels of happiness. Healthcare service needs were associated with carer burden (β = .28, p = .04), while psychological needs (β = -.38, p = .028), health care service needs (β = -.30, p = .049), information needs (β = .29, p = .028), carer comorbidity (β = -.18, p = .030), and gender (β = -.16, p = .045) were associated with happiness. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that different aspects of carer characteristics and unmet needs are associated with carer burden and happiness. Efforts directed at reducing unmet healthcare service needs in particular are merited given their associations with both aspects of carer quality of life.
Entities:
Keywords:
Carer burden; Happiness; Head and neck cancer carer burden; Quality of life; Unmet needs
Authors: J E Lutomski; N J A van Exel; G I J M Kempen; E P Moll van Charante; W P J den Elzen; A P D Jansen; P F M Krabbe; B Steunenberg; E W Steyerberg; M G M Olde Rikkert; R J F Melis Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Margaret L Longacre; John A Ridge; Barbara A Burtness; Thomas J Galloway; Carolyn Y Fang Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Halina Sklenarova; Arne Krümpelmann; Markus W Haun; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Johannes Huber; Michael Thomas; Eva C Winkler; Wolfgang Herzog; Mechthild Hartmann Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Paul Hanly; Alan Ó Céilleachair; Mairead Skally; Eamonn O'Leary; Kanika Kapur; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Anthony Staines; Linda Sharp Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alicia Aurora Rodríguez; Imanol Amayra; Juan Francisco López-Paz; Oscar Martínez; Maitane García; Mónika Salgueiro; Mohammad Al-Rashaida; Paula María Luna; Paula Pérez-Nuñez; Nicole Passi; Irune García; Javiera Ortega Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Belinda C Goodwin; Fiona Crawford-Williams; Michael Ireland; Sonja March; Suzanne K Chambers; Joanne F Aitken; Jeff Dunn Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 2.328
Authors: Mayara Goulart de Camargos; Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva; Marco Antônio de Oliveira; Paula de Souza Ferreira; Vinicius Tolentino Nardoto de Almeida; Sandra de Andrade Cadamuro; Carla Simone Leite de Almeida; Carlos Eduardo Paiva Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-07-11 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Alicia Aurora Rodríguez; Óscar Martínez; Imanol Amayra; Juan Francisco López-Paz; Mohammad Al-Rashaida; Esther Lázaro; Patricia Caballero; Manuel Pérez; Sarah Berrocoso; Maitane García; Paula María Luna; Paula Pérez-Núñez; Nicole Passi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390