Joanne Hiatt1,2, Adrienne Young3,4, Teresa Brown3,4, Merrilyn Banks3,4, Bronwyn Segon3, Judith Bauer3,4. 1. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia. Joanne.Hiatt@health.qld.gov.au. 2. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Level 2, Dr James Mayne Building, Butterfield Street, 4029, Herston, QLD, Australia. Joanne.Hiatt@health.qld.gov.au. 3. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia. 4. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Level 2, Dr James Mayne Building, Butterfield Street, 4029, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To understand and compare the nutrition care experiences of carers supporting patients throughout surgery and radiation treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) to inform changes to service delivery in the inpatient and outpatient setting to ensure carers needs in their supportive role throughout the treatment and survivorship period are met. METHODS: As part of a larger study, narrative interviews were completed with fourteen carers of patients diagnosed with HNC at 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months post-treatment completion. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret and understand differences in carer experiences of nutrition care between surgery and radiation treatment. RESULTS: Two main themes across each treatment modality were identified: (1) access to information and support from healthcare professionals and (2) adjustment to the physical and psychological impact of treatment. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the increasing need to ensure carers are included in the provision of nutrition information and support to patients throughout and beyond their treatment trajectory. Having structured support available to patients and carers throughout radiation treatment meant that carer needs were reduced. However, without the opportunity for structured support in the inpatient setting, many carers expressed high care needs in supporting patients in the post-surgical phase. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Providing carers with access to structured support for nutrition care in the inpatient and outpatient setting can reduce their supportive care needs throughout the treatment and survivorship period.
PURPOSE: To understand and compare the nutrition care experiences of carers supporting patients throughout surgery and radiation treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) to inform changes to service delivery in the inpatient and outpatient setting to ensure carers needs in their supportive role throughout the treatment and survivorship period are met. METHODS: As part of a larger study, narrative interviews were completed with fourteen carers of patients diagnosed with HNC at 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months post-treatment completion. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret and understand differences in carer experiences of nutrition care between surgery and radiation treatment. RESULTS: Two main themes across each treatment modality were identified: (1) access to information and support from healthcare professionals and (2) adjustment to the physical and psychological impact of treatment. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the increasing need to ensure carers are included in the provision of nutrition information and support to patients throughout and beyond their treatment trajectory. Having structured support available to patients and carers throughout radiation treatment meant that carer needs were reduced. However, without the opportunity for structured support in the inpatient setting, many carers expressed high care needs in supporting patients in the post-surgical phase. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Providing carers with access to structured support for nutrition care in the inpatient and outpatient setting can reduce their supportive care needs throughout the treatment and survivorship period.
Authors: Emily H Castellanos; Mary S Dietrich; Stewart M Bond; Nancy Wells; Karen Schumacher; Apar Kishor Ganti; Barbara A Murphy Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-01-20 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Paul Hanly; Rebecca Maguire; Myles Balfe; Philip Hyland; Aileen Timmons; Eleanor O'Sullivan; Phyllis Butow; Linda Sharp Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Valentina Bressan; Annamaria Bagnasco; Giuseppe Aleo; Gianluca Catania; Milko P Zanini; Fiona Timmins; Loredana Sasso Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rebecca L Nund; Nerina A Scarinci; Bena Cartmill; Elizabeth C Ward; Pim Kuipers; Sandro V Porceddu Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: David Kam; Andrew Salib; George Gorgy; Tapan D Patel; Eric T Carniol; Jean Anderson Eloy; Soly Baredes; Richard Chan Woo Park Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Jessica L Petrick; Andrea A Florio; Ariana Znaor; David Ruggieri; Mathieu Laversanne; Christian S Alvarez; Jacques Ferlay; Patricia C Valery; Freddie Bray; Katherine A McGlynn Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 7.316