Becky A Purkaple1, James W Mold2, Sixia Chen3. 1. University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma becky-purkaple@ouhsc.edu. 2. Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient participation in clinical decision making improves outcomes, including quality of life (QOL), but the typical problem-oriented approach may impede consideration of functional goals. We wondered if patients could encourage primary care physicians to pay attention to their QOL goals by writing them on pre-encounter forms. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of 2 different pre-visit questionnaires on the content of patient-physician encounters in a family medicine practice at an academic medical center. Using investigator-blinded block randomization, we arranged for 8 faculty and 8 resident physicians to participate in 2 intervention and 2 control videotaped encounters each for a total of 64 encounters. The intervention questionnaire included questions about QOL goals and concerns, while the control questionnaire asked about symptoms. Videotapes were reviewed to determine whether the patients' QOL goals were mentioned and whether they were used in decision making. We also scored encounters using Modified Flanders Interaction Analysis, which assesses and codifies patient and physician communication, and the Modified Carkhuff-Truax Scale, which measures empathy, attending, congruence, and positive regard. RESULTS: Patients were able to record QOL goals and concerns, but QOL issues were mentioned in only 2 of the 64 encounters, once by a patient and once by a physician. In neither case was this information used in decision making. More empathy was expressed by physicians during control encounters (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients were able to articulate their QOL goals on paper, but that did not prime them or their physicians to alter the process or content of the clinical encounters. In fact, providing QOL information was associated with reduced physician empathy.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Patient participation in clinical decision making improves outcomes, including quality of life (QOL), but the typical problem-oriented approach may impede consideration of functional goals. We wondered if patients could encourage primary care physicians to pay attention to their QOL goals by writing them on pre-encounter forms. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of 2 different pre-visit questionnaires on the content of patient-physician encounters in a family medicine practice at an academic medical center. Using investigator-blinded block randomization, we arranged for 8 faculty and 8 resident physicians to participate in 2 intervention and 2 control videotaped encounters each for a total of 64 encounters. The intervention questionnaire included questions about QOL goals and concerns, while the control questionnaire asked about symptoms. Videotapes were reviewed to determine whether the patients' QOL goals were mentioned and whether they were used in decision making. We also scored encounters using Modified Flanders Interaction Analysis, which assesses and codifies patient and physician communication, and the Modified Carkhuff-Truax Scale, which measures empathy, attending, congruence, and positive regard. RESULTS:Patients were able to record QOL goals and concerns, but QOL issues were mentioned in only 2 of the 64 encounters, once by a patient and once by a physician. In neither case was this information used in decision making. More empathy was expressed by physicians during control encounters (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS:Patients were able to articulate their QOL goals on paper, but that did not prime them or their physicians to alter the process or content of the clinical encounters. In fact, providing QOL information was associated with reduced physician empathy.
Authors: Betsy Sleath; Robyn Sayner; Michelle Vitko; Delesha M Carpenter; Susan J Blalock; Kelly W Muir; Annette L Giangiacomo; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Alan L Robin Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-11-22
Authors: Anna J Podolanczuk; Alyson W Wong; Shigeki Saito; Joseph A Lasky; Christopher J Ryerson; Oliver Eickelberg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Pauline Boeckxstaens; Sara Willems; Mieke Lanssens; Charlotte Decuypere; Guy Brusselle; Thomas Kühlein; Jan De Maeseneer; An De Sutter Journal: J Comorb Date: 2016-11-14
Authors: Daniele Fineschi; Sofia Acciai; Margherita Napolitani; Giovanni Scarafuggi; Gabriele Messina; Giovanni Guarducci; Nicola Nante Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 3.390