Literature DB >> 27184573

Assessing Self-Control and Geosocial Networking App Behavior Among an Online Sample of Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Matthew R Beymer1,2, Aimee Drolet Rossi3, Suzanne B Shu3.   

Abstract

Geosocial networking phone applications (GSN apps) used to meet sexual partners have become popular in the men who have sex with men (MSM) communities of the USA since 2009. Previous studies have shown greater incidence of gonorrhea and chlamydia and lower testing frequency for HIV testing among GSN app users when compared to non-users. The present study aims to determine the type, number, and frequency of apps used, as well as the association between dispositional self-control and health-related behaviors. Participants (n = 146) were recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk program to respond to a brief GSN app marketing survey. Multivariate regression was used to determine differences in app priorities, length of app use, and number of sexual partners between high self-control and low self-control participants. A majority of the participants reported using Grindr (78 %) followed by Scruff (19 %), Growlr (12 %), and Jack'd (12 %). Most individuals used one app only (58 %), but a significant proportion reported using two apps (28 %) or three or more apps (14 %). Respondents with low self-control were more likely to report a higher number of hours using GSN apps and a higher number of sexual partners, controlling for race/ethnicity, education, employment, and HIV status. Given the popularity of this burgeoning communication medium, these findings have important implications for developing prevention resources for different segments of GSN app users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geosocial networking apps; Self-control men who have sex with men; Social networking apps

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27184573      PMCID: PMC4987584          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-016-0056-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  16 in total

1.  Risk among men who have sex with men in the United States: a comparison of an Internet sample and a conventional outreach sample.

Authors:  Scott D Rhodes; Ralph J DiClemente; Heather Cecil; Kenneth C Hergenrather; Leland J Yee
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2002-02

2.  Unsafe sexual behavior and correlates of risk in a probability sample of men who have sex with men in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Devon D Brewer; Matthew R Golden; H Hunter Handsfield
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Sex on demand: geosocial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Matthew R Beymer; Robert E Weiss; Robert K Bolan; Ellen T Rudy; Linda B Bourque; Jeffrey P Rodriguez; Donald E Morisky
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Men who have sex with men in Great Britain: comparison of a self-selected internet sample with a national probability sample.

Authors:  Alison Ruth Evans; Richard D Wiggins; Catherine H Mercer; Graham J Bolding; Jonathan Elford
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

6.  Sexual risk, nitrite inhalant use, and lack of circumcision associated with HIV seroconversion in men who have sex with men in the United States.

Authors:  Susan P Buchbinder; Eric Vittinghoff; Patrick J Heagerty; Connie L Celum; George R Seage; Franklyn N Judson; David McKirnan; Kenneth H Mayer; Beryl A Koblin
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices of men who have sex with men using GRINDR in Los Angeles, California.

Authors:  Raphael J Landovitz; Chi-Hong Tseng; Matthew Weissman; Michael Haymer; Brett Mendenhall; Kathryn Rogers; Rosemary Veniegas; Pamina M Gorbach; Cathy J Reback; Steven Shoptaw
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  Risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Beryl A Koblin; Marla J Husnik; Grant Colfax; Yijian Huang; Maria Madison; Kenneth Mayer; Patrick J Barresi; Thomas J Coates; Margaret A Chesney; Susan Buchbinder
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.177

9.  Patterns of lifetime and recent HIV testing among men who have sex with men in New York City who use Grindr.

Authors:  H Jonathon Rendina; Ruben H Jimenez; Christian Grov; Ana Ventuneac; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-01

10.  Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Justin J Lehmiller; Michael Ioerger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Post-exposure prophylaxis awareness and use among men who have sex with men in London who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications.

Authors:  William C Goedel; Daniel Hagen; Perry N Halkitis; Richard E Greene; Marybec Griffin-Tomas; Forrest A Brooks; DeMarc Hickson; Dustin T Duncan
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2016-12-02

2.  Behind the Screens: A Systematic Literature Review of Quantitative Research on Mobile Dating.

Authors:  Femke Konings; Sindy R Sumter; Ilse Vranken; Rebecca Dredge; Laura Vandenbosch
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  Online Partner Seeking and Sexual Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men From Small and Midsized Towns: Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Vira Pravosud; April M Ballard; Ian W Holloway; April M Young
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  Social and behavioural research prospects for sexually transmissible infection prevention in the era of advances in biomedical approaches.

Authors:  Matthew Hogben; Patricia J Dittus; Jami S Leichliter; Sevgi O Aral
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.706

5.  Are Mechanical Turk worker samples representative of health status and health behaviors in the U.S.?

Authors:  Kelly Walters; Dimitri A Christakis; Davene R Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The use of geosocial networking smartphone applications and the risk of sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haidong Wang; Lu Zhang; Ying Zhou; Keke Wang; Xiaoya Zhang; Jianhui Wu; Guoli Wang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Social Network Interventions for HIV Transmission Elimination.

Authors:  Jade Pagkas-Bather; Lindsay E Young; Yen-Tyng Chen; John A Schneider
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.071

8.  Mobile HIV Testing Through Social Networking Platforms: Comparative Study.

Authors:  Piao-Yi Chiou; Nai-Ying Ko; Chien-Yu Chien
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Sexual Partner Referral for HIV Testing Through Social Networking Platforms: Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Piao-Yi Chiou; Chien-Ching Hung; Chien-Yu Chen
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2022-04-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.