Matthew R Beymer1, Robert E Weiss2, Robert K Bolan3, Ellen T Rudy4, Linda B Bourque2, Jeffrey P Rodriguez3, Donald E Morisky2. 1. L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center, Los Angeles, California, USA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3. L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health, Sexually Transmitted Disease Program, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Geosocial networking applications (GSN apps) used for meeting sexual partners have become increasingly popular with men who have sex with men (MSM) since 2009. The current study aimed to determine if self-identified HIV-negative, MSM clinic attendees who used GSN apps have an increased incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) compared to self-identified HIV-negative, MSM attendees who met sexual partners via in-person venues, such as bars or clubs or through MSM-specific hook-up websites. METHODS: Data were collected between August 2011 and January 2013 on all self-identified HIV-negative, MSM clients visiting the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center for STI screening. A total of 7184 individuals tested for STIs and self-reported behaviours on drug use and social networking methods to meet sexual partners. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyse the results. RESULTS: Individuals who used GSN apps for meeting sexual partners had greater odds of testing positive for gonorrhoea (OR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.48) and for chlamydia (OR: 1.37; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.65) compared to individuals who met partners through in-person methods only. There were no significant differences in syphilis and HIV incidence between those who met partners via in-person venues only, on the internet or through GSN apps. CONCLUSIONS: The present study concludes that sexual health clinic MSM attendees who are meeting on GSN apps are at greater risk for gonorrhoea and chlamydia than MSM attendees who meet in-person or on the internet. Future interventions should explore the use of these novel technologies for testing promotion, prevention and education. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Geosocial networking applications (GSNapps) used for meeting sexual partners have become increasingly popular with men who have sex with men (MSM) since 2009. The current study aimed to determine if self-identified HIV-negative, MSM clinic attendees who used GSNapps have an increased incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) compared to self-identified HIV-negative, MSM attendees who met sexual partners via in-person venues, such as bars or clubs or through MSM-specific hook-up websites. METHODS: Data were collected between August 2011 and January 2013 on all self-identified HIV-negative, MSM clients visiting the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center for STI screening. A total of 7184 individuals tested for STIs and self-reported behaviours on drug use and social networking methods to meet sexual partners. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyse the results. RESULTS: Individuals who used GSNapps for meeting sexual partners had greater odds of testing positive for gonorrhoea (OR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.48) and for chlamydia (OR: 1.37; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.65) compared to individuals who met partners through in-person methods only. There were no significant differences in syphilis and HIV incidence between those who met partners via in-person venues only, on the internet or through GSNapps. CONCLUSIONS: The present study concludes that sexual health clinic MSM attendees who are meeting on GSNapps are at greater risk for gonorrhoea and chlamydia than MSM attendees who meet in-person or on the internet. Future interventions should explore the use of these novel technologies for testing promotion, prevention and education. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
CHLAMYDIA INFECTION; GAY MEN; GONORRHOEA; SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR
Authors: Grant N Colfax; Susan P Buchbinder; Peter G A Cornelisse; Eric Vittinghoff; Kenneth Mayer; Connie Celum Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-07-26 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: B R Simon Rosser; Michael H Miner; Walter O Bockting; Michael W Ross; Joseph Konstan; Laura Gurak; Jeffrey Stanton; Weston Edwards; Scott Jacoby; Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Rafael Mazin; Eli Coleman Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2008-05-30
Authors: Earl R Burrell; Heather A Pines; Edward Robbie; Leonardo Coleman; Ryan D Murphy; Kristen L Hess; Peter Anton; Pamina M Gorbach Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-10
Authors: Amanda E Tanner; Lilli Mann; Eunyoung Song; Jorge Alonzo; Katherine Schafer; Elías Arellano; Jesus M Garcia; Scott D Rhodes Journal: AIDS Educ Prev Date: 2016-06
Authors: Antonio Junco-Fernández; Madeline C Montgomery; Christina Crowley; Thomas Bertrand; Theodore P Marak; Michaela A Maynard; Caroline Gummo; Timothy P Flanigan; Philip A Chan Journal: R I Med J (2013) Date: 2019-02-01
Authors: Philip A Chan; Caitlin Towey; Joanna Poceta; Jennifer Rose; Thomas Bertrand; Rami Kantor; Julia Harvey; E Karina Santamaria; Nicole Alexander-Scott; Amy Nunn Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Tyler B Wray; Philip A Chan; Mark A Celio; Ashley E Pérez; Alexander C Adia; Erik M Simpanen; Laura-Allison Woods; Peter M Monti Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2018-02