Literature DB >> 35790613

Behind the Screens: A Systematic Literature Review of Quantitative Research on Mobile Dating.

Femke Konings1,2, Sindy R Sumter3, Ilse Vranken4,5, Rebecca Dredge4, Laura Vandenbosch4.   

Abstract

Mobile dating applications (MDAs) have become commonly used tools to seek out dating and sexual partners online. The current review aimed to systematically synthesize empirical findings in 72 quantitative studies on mobile dating, published in ISI-ranked journals between 2014 and 2020. This review focused on summarizing different approaches toward mobile dating, identity features of quantitative research on mobile dating, and hypothesized antecedents and outcomes of mobile dating. Our findings showed, first, that the literature diverges in how mobile dating is operationalized. Second, quantitative research on mobile dating predominantly consists of cross-sectional studies that draw on theoretical insights from multiple disciplines. Third, a variety of traits and sociodemographics were associated with MDA use. In particular, using MDAs for (1) relational goals related to being male, non-heterosexual, higher levels of sociosexuality, sensation seeking, extraversion, and holding more positive peer norms about using MDAs for relational goals; (2) intrapersonal goals related to being female and having more socially impairing traits; and (3) entertainment goals related to having higher levels of sociosexuality, sensation seeking, and antisocial traits. Outcomes significantly associated with general use of MDAs were scoring higher on sexual permissiveness and on engaging in casual (unprotected) sexual intercourse, as well as having higher risk at nonconsensual sex. MDA use was also connected with increased psychological distress and body dissatisfaction. Shortcomings of the existing research approaches and measures are discussed and six methodological and theoretical recommendations for future research are provided.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Media effects; Mobile dating; PRISMA method; Systematic literature review

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35790613     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02312-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  29 in total

1.  Most people are not WEIRD.

Authors:  Joseph Henrich; Steven J Heine; Ara Norenzayan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The association between smartphone dating applications and college students' casual sex encounters and condom use.

Authors:  Edmond P H Choi; Janet Y H Wong; Herman H M Lo; Wendy Wong; Jasmine H M Chio; Daniel Y T Fong
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2016-07-11

3.  Contextual factors in geosocial-networking smartphone application use and engagement in condomless anal intercourse among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who use Grindr.

Authors:  William C Goedel; Dustin T Duncan
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Swipe Right: Dating Website and App Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Authors:  Hannah J Badal; Jo Ellen Stryker; Nickolas DeLuca; David W Purcell
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-04

5.  Assessing Self-Control and Geosocial Networking App Behavior Among an Online Sample of Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Matthew R Beymer; Aimee Drolet Rossi; Suzanne B Shu
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  The Role of Gay Identity Confusion and Outness in Sex-Seeking on Mobile Dating Apps Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Conditional Process Analysis.

Authors:  Lik Sam Chan
Journal:  J Homosex       Date:  2016-06-07

7.  Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Depressive Symptoms among Korean Adolescents: JS High School Study.

Authors:  Na Hyun Kim; Ji Hye Park; Dong Phil Choi; Joo Young Lee; Hyeon Chang Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Utilization of dating apps by men who have sex with men for persuading other men toward substance use.

Authors:  Smith Boonchutima; Watsayut Kongchan
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2017-01-12

9.  Factor structure of the Cybersex Motives Questionnaire.

Authors:  Elisabeth Franc; Yasser Khazaal; Katarzyna Jasiowka; Thibault Lepers; Francesco Bianchi-Demicheli; Stéphane Rothen
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 6.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.