| Literature DB >> 27182603 |
Minxue Shen1,2,3, Hongzhuan Tan1, Shujin Zhou4, Ravi Retnakaran5, Graeme N Smith6, Sandra T Davidge7,8,9, Jacquetta Trasler10,11,12, Mark C Walker2,3,13, Shi Wu Wen1,2,3,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that higher folate intake from food and supplementation is associated with decreased blood pressure (BP). The association between serum folate concentration and BP has been examined in few studies. We aim to examine the association between serum folate and BP levels in a cohort of young Chinese women.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27182603 PMCID: PMC4868331 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of study population, by serum folate group.
| Overall | < 6.8 nmol/L | ≥ 6.8 nmol/L | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1522 | 845 (55.2%) | 687 (44.8%) | |
| Serum folate (nmol/L) | 7.52 ± 5.45 | 4.09 ± 1.75 | 11.74 ± 5.49 | <0.01 |
| Age (year) | 25.21 ± 3.09 | 24.83 ± 2.77 | 25.69 ± 3.42 | <0.01 |
| Education (year) | 10.05 ± 3.90 | 10.05 ± 3.96 | 10.05 ± 3.83 | 0.99 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.11 ± 2.43 | 20.11 ± 2.46 | 20.12 ± 2.40 | 0.94 |
| Homocysteine (μmol/L) | 11.02 ± 4.10 | 11.36 ± 4.56 | 10.61 ± 3.42 | <0.01 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 4.58 ± 1.25 | 4.47 ± 1.41 | 4.71 ± 1.02 | <0.01 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.07 ± 0.71 | 1.10 ± 0.76 | 1.03 ± 0.64 | 0.05 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.79 ± 1.14 | 3.69 ± 1.20 | 3.92 ± 1.06 | <0.01 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 110.65 ± 11.48 | 112.28 ± 11.35 | 108.64 ± 12.87 | <0.01 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 70.67 ± 8.72 | 71.50 ± 8.46 | 69.66 ± 8.93 | <0.01 |
| Parity | ||||
| Nulliparous | 1312 (85.6%) | 757 (89.6%) | 555 (80.8%) | <0.01 |
| Parous | 220 (14.4%) | 88 (10.4%) | 132 (19.2%) |
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
a P values of analyses of variance for normal distributed variables, and chi-square tests for categorical variables.
Determinants blood pressure in non-pregnant Chinese women.
| SBP (mmHg) | DBP (mmHg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude (95%CI) | Adjusted (95%CI) | Crude (95%CI) | Adjusted (95%CI) | |||
| Serum folate (nmol/L) | –0.51 (–0.62, –0.39) | –0.45 (–0.57, –0.32) | <0.01 | –0.28 (–0.36, –0.20) | –0.25 (–0.34, –0.16) | <0.01 |
| Age | –0.48 (–0.67, –0.28) | –0.37 (–0.61, –0.12) | <0.01 | –0.25 (–0.39, –0.11) | –0.23 (–0.41, –0.05) | 0.01 |
| Education | 0.04 (–0.12, 0.19) | –0.06 (–0.27, 0.16) | 0.59 | 0.12 (0.01, 0.24) | 0.03 (–0.13, 0.18) | 0.72 |
| Parity | –4.79 (–6.53, –3.06) | –3.82 (–5.89, –1.75) | <0.01 | –3.39 (–4.64, –2.15) | –2.82 (–4.31, –1.33) | <0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.46 (0.17, 0.76) | 0.70 (0.39, 1.00) | <0.01 | 0.19 (–0.02, 0.40) | 0.36 (0.14, 0.58) | <0.01 |
| Homocysteine (μmol/L) | 0.07 (–0.08, 0.23) | 0.00 (–0.17, 0.17) | 0.99 | 0.12 (0.01, 0.23) | 0.07 (–0.05, 0.20) | 0.24 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 0.14 (–0.38, 0.66) | 0.08 (–0.51, 0.67) | 0.79 | –0.01 (–0.37, 0.36) | 0.07 (–0.35, 0.50) | 0.74 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 0.82 (–0.09, 1.73) | –0.32 (–0.14, 0.98) | 0.58 | –0.02 (–0.67, 0.64) | –0.92 (–1.75, –0.09) | 0.03 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 0.22 (–0.34, 0.78) | 0.78 (0.15, 1.42) | 0.02 | 0.42 (0.02, 0.82) | 0.90 (0.45, 1.36) | <0.01 |
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index.
a Adjusted for all other variables listed. Adjusted estimates can be interpreted in the following way: SBP decreased by 0.45 mmHg per unit (nmol/L) change in serum folate, after adjustment for all other variables.
b P values of estimators in the adjusted model.
Fig 1Estimates from principal component regression.
(a) Scree plot shows the eigenvalue of each component. Components with an eigenvalue ≥1 were extracted. (b) Component matrix shows the correlation between z-scores of the original variables and principal components. Color signifies the direction and color depth quantifies the size, as indicated in the scale bar. (c) and (d) Effect size on SBP / DBP (mmHg) per one standard deviation (SD) change in variables, calculated according to the regression equations and component matrix (e.g. SBP and DBP decreased by 2 mmHg and 1 mmHg, respectively, per one SD increase in serum folate [nmol/L], after adjustment for all other variables).