Agessandro Abrahao1, James Downar1, Hanika Pinto1, Nicolas Dupré1, Aaron Izenberg1, William Kingston1, Lawrence Korngut1, Colleen O'Connell1, Nicolae Petrescu1, Christen Shoesmith1, Anu Tandon1, Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos1, Lorne Zinman2. 1. From Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (A.A., H.P., A.I., W.K., N.P., A.T., L.Z.), University of Toronto, Canada; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (A.A.), Brazil; Critical Care and Palliative Care (J.D.), University Health Network, Toronto; Clinic of Neuromuscular & Neurogenetic Diseases (N.D.), CHU de Québec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (L.K.), Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary; Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine (C.O.), Stan Cassidy Centre for Rehabilitation; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (C.S.), Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, Canada; and Division of Rheumatology (A.B.V.-S.), Internal Medicine Department, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 2. From Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (A.A., H.P., A.I., W.K., N.P., A.T., L.Z.), University of Toronto, Canada; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (A.A.), Brazil; Critical Care and Palliative Care (J.D.), University Health Network, Toronto; Clinic of Neuromuscular & Neurogenetic Diseases (N.D.), CHU de Québec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (L.K.), Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary; Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine (C.O.), Stan Cassidy Centre for Rehabilitation; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (C.S.), Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, Canada; and Division of Rheumatology (A.B.V.-S.), Internal Medicine Department, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. lorne.zinman@sunnybrook.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To survey amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) health care providers to determine attitudes regarding physician-assisted death (PAD) after the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) invalidated the Criminal Code provisions that prohibit PAD in February 2015. METHODS: We conducted a Canada-wide survey of physicians and allied health professionals (AHP) involved in the care of patients with ALS on their opinions regarding (1) the SCC ruling, (2) their willingness to participate in PAD, and (3) the PAD implementation process for patients with ALS. RESULTS: We received 231 responses from ALS health care providers representing all 15 academic ALS centers in Canada, with an overall response rate for invited participants of 74%. The majority of physicians and AHP agreed with the SCC ruling and believed that patients with moderate and severe stage ALS should have access to PAD; however, most physicians would not provide a lethal prescription or injection to an eligible patient. They preferred the patient obtain a second opinion to confirm eligibility, have a psychiatric assessment, and then be referred to a third party to administer PAD. The majority of respondents felt unprepared for the initiation of this program and favored the development of PAD training modules and guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: ALS health care providers support the SCC decision and the majority believe PAD should be available to patients with moderate to severe ALS with physical or emotional suffering. However, few clinicians are willing to directly provide PAD and additional training and guidelines are required before implementation in Canada.
OBJECTIVE: To survey amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) health care providers to determine attitudes regarding physician-assisted death (PAD) after the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) invalidated the Criminal Code provisions that prohibit PAD in February 2015. METHODS: We conducted a Canada-wide survey of physicians and allied health professionals (AHP) involved in the care of patients with ALS on their opinions regarding (1) the SCC ruling, (2) their willingness to participate in PAD, and (3) the PAD implementation process for patients with ALS. RESULTS: We received 231 responses from ALS health care providers representing all 15 academic ALS centers in Canada, with an overall response rate for invited participants of 74%. The majority of physicians and AHP agreed with the SCC ruling and believed that patients with moderate and severe stage ALS should have access to PAD; however, most physicians would not provide a lethal prescription or injection to an eligible patient. They preferred the patient obtain a second opinion to confirm eligibility, have a psychiatric assessment, and then be referred to a third party to administer PAD. The majority of respondents felt unprepared for the initiation of this program and favored the development of PAD training modules and guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: ALS health care providers support the SCC decision and the majority believe PAD should be available to patients with moderate to severe ALS with physical or emotional suffering. However, few clinicians are willing to directly provide PAD and additional training and guidelines are required before implementation in Canada.
Authors: Maud Maessen; Jan H Veldink; Leonard H van den Berg; Henrike J Schouten; Gerrit van der Wal; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: J Neurol Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Jan H Veldink; John H J Wokke; Gerrit van der Wal; J M B Vianney de Jong; Leonard H van den Berg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-05-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Helene Starks; Moreen Shannon-Dudley; Anthony L Back; Frederick R Appelbaum; F Marc Stewart Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Derek W Braverman; Brian S Marcus; Paul G Wakim; Mark R Mercurio; Gary S Kopf Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 3.612