BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a disease that causes progressive paralysis leading to respiratory failure. Patients with ALS may consider physician-assisted suicide. However, it is not known how many patients, if given the option, would actually decide to end their lives by physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia nor at what stage of the disease they would choose to do so. METHODS: We identified physicians of 279 patients in the Netherlands with a diagnosis of ALS who died between 1994 and 1999. Physicians were asked to fill out a validated questionnaire about the end-of-life decisions that were made. Of 241 eligible physicians, 203 returned the questionnaire (84 percent). RESULTS: Of the 203 patients, 35 (17 percent) chose euthanasia and died that way. An additional six patients (3 percent) died as a result of physician-assisted suicide. Patients to whom religion was important were less likely to have died as a result of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. The choice of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide was not associated with any particular characteristics of the disease or of the patient's care, nor was it associated with income or educational level. Disability before death was significantly more severe in patients who died as a result of euthanasia than among those who died in other ways. Physician-assisted suicide appeared to occur somewhat earlier in the course of the disease than did euthanasia. An additional 48 patients (24 percent) received palliative treatment, which probably shortened their lives. CONCLUSIONS: In the Netherlands, we found that one in five patients with ALS died as a result of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
BACKGROUND:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a disease that causes progressive paralysis leading to respiratory failure. Patients with ALS may consider physician-assisted suicide. However, it is not known how many patients, if given the option, would actually decide to end their lives by physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia nor at what stage of the disease they would choose to do so. METHODS: We identified physicians of 279 patients in the Netherlands with a diagnosis of ALS who died between 1994 and 1999. Physicians were asked to fill out a validated questionnaire about the end-of-life decisions that were made. Of 241 eligible physicians, 203 returned the questionnaire (84 percent). RESULTS: Of the 203 patients, 35 (17 percent) chose euthanasia and died that way. An additional six patients (3 percent) died as a result of physician-assisted suicide. Patients to whom religion was important were less likely to have died as a result of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. The choice of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide was not associated with any particular characteristics of the disease or of the patient's care, nor was it associated with income or educational level. Disability before death was significantly more severe in patients who died as a result of euthanasia than among those who died in other ways. Physician-assisted suicide appeared to occur somewhat earlier in the course of the disease than did euthanasia. An additional 48 patients (24 percent) received palliative treatment, which probably shortened their lives. CONCLUSIONS: In the Netherlands, we found that one in five patients with ALS died as a result of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Authors: A Chiò; A Gauthier; A Montuschi; A Calvo; N Di Vito; P Ghiglione; R Mutani Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Maud Maessen; Jan H Veldink; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Henk T Hendricks; Helenius J Schelhaas; Hepke F Grupstra; Gerrit van der Wal; Leonard H van den Berg Journal: J Neurol Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: S M Albert; J G Rabkin; M L Del Bene; T Tider; I O'Sullivan; L P Rowland; H Mitsumoto Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-07-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dorothée Lulé; Sonja Nonnenmacher; Sonja Sorg; Johanna Heimrath; Martin Hautzinger; Thomas Meyer; Andrea Kübler; Niels Birbaumer; Albert C Ludolph Journal: J Neurol Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Maud Maessen; Jan H Veldink; Leonard H van den Berg; Henrike J Schouten; Gerrit van der Wal; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: J Neurol Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Leo H Wang; Michael A Elliott; Lily Jung Henson; Elba Gerena-Maldonado; Susan Strom; Sharon Downing; Jennifer Vetrovs; Paige Kayihan; Piper Paul; Kate Kennedy; Joshua O Benditt; Michael D Weiss Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Agessandro Abrahao; James Downar; Hanika Pinto; Nicolas Dupré; Aaron Izenberg; William Kingston; Lawrence Korngut; Colleen O'Connell; Nicolae Petrescu; Christen Shoesmith; Anu Tandon; Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos; Lorne Zinman Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 9.910