| Literature DB >> 27176718 |
Ana Ramo1, Luis V Monteagudo2, Emilio Del Cacho1, Caridad Sánchez-Acedo1, Joaquín Quílez1.
Abstract
A multilocus fragment typing approach including eleven variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) loci and the GP60 gene was used to investigate the intra-farm and intra-host genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium parvum in sheep farms in a confined area in northeastern Spain. Genomic DNA samples of 113 C. parvum isolates from diarrheic pre-weaned lambs collected in 49 meat-type sheep farms were analyzed. Loci exhibited various degrees of polymorphism, the finding of 7-9 alleles in the four most variable and discriminatory markers (ML2, Cgd6_5400, Cgd6_3940, and GP60) being remarkable. The combination of alleles at the twelve loci identified a total of 74 multilocus subtypes (MLTs) and provided a Hunter-Gaston discriminatory index of 0.988 (95% CI, 0.979-0.996). The finding that most MLTs (n = 64) were unique to individual farms evidenced that cryptosporidial infection is mainly transmitted within sheep flocks, with herd-to-herd transmission playing a secondary role. Limited intra- host variability was found, since only five isolates were genotypically mixed. In contrast, a significant intra-farm genetic diversity was seen, with the presence of multiple MLTs on more than a half of the farms (28/46), suggesting frequent mutations or genetic exchange through recombination. Comparison with a previous study in calves in northern Spain using the same 12-loci typing approach showed differences in the identity of major alleles at most loci, with a single MLT being shared between lambs and calves. Analysis of evolutionary descent by the algorithm eBURST indicated a high degree of genetic divergence, with over 41% MLTs appearing as singletons along with a high number of clonal complexes, most of them linking only two MLTs. Bayesian Structure analysis and F statistics also revealed the genetic remoteness of most C. parvum isolates and no ancestral population size was chosen. Linkage analysis evidenced a prevalent pattern of clonality within the parasite population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27176718 PMCID: PMC4866762 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Geographic map of the sampling locations in the province of Zaragoza (NE Spain).
Adjusted allele sizes and number allocation for each of eleven VNTR loci and the GP60 marker identified by automated capillary electrophoresis in Cryptosporidium parvum isolates from pre-weaned lambs.
| Locus and adjusted fragment size (pb) (allele no.) | No. of isolates (%) (n = 101) | No. of farms (n = 46) |
|---|---|---|
| 226 (1) | 65 (64.3) | 30 |
| 238 (2) | 24 (23.8) | 15 |
| 223 (3) | 12 (11.9) | 6 |
| 324 (1) | 56 (55.4) | 27 |
| 333 (2) | 26 (25.7) | 16 |
| 342 (3) | 19 (18.8) | 13 |
| 191 (2) | 45 (44.5) | 24 |
| 193 (9) | 25 (24.7) | 17 |
| 195 (15) | 2 (1.9) | 2 |
| 197 (10) | 2 (1.9) | 1 |
| 221 (12) | 12 (11.9) | 6 |
| 225 (16) | 5 (4.9) | 2 |
| 227 (3) | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 231 (5) | 8 (7.9) | 6 |
| 237 (8) | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 167 (2) | 27 (26.7) | 16 |
| 169 (3) | 65 (64.3) | 33 |
| 171 (4) | 8 (7.9) | 6 |
| 165 (1) + 171 | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 304 (1) | 52 (51.5) | 25 |
| 310 (5) | 33 (32.7) | 16 |
| 316 (2) | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 322 (3) | 14 (13.9) | 8 |
| 304 + 310 | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 417 (1) | 94 (93.1) | 43 |
| 420 (3) | 2 (1.9) | 1 |
| 423 (4) | 5 (4.9) | 4 |
| 516 (3) | 99 (98) | 45 |
| 549 (1) | 2 (1.9) | 1 |
| 157 (7) | 24 (23.8) | 10 |
| 163 (2) | 58 (57.4) | 29 |
| 181 (3) | 3 (2.9) | 2 |
| 193 (4) | 10 (9.9) | 5 |
| 199 (5) | 5 (4.9) | 4 |
| 157 + 193 | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 235 (5) | 73 (72.3) | 33 |
| 241 (6) | 5 (4.9) | 3 |
| 247 (7) | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 259 (8) | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 265 (2) | 15 (14.8) | 8 |
| 277 (9) | 6 (5.9) | 3 |
| 250 (4) | 10 (9.9) | 6 |
| 262 (5) | 5 (4.9) | 5 |
| 268 (6) | 3 (2.9) | 3 |
| 271 (7) | 48 (47.5) | 21 |
| 277 (1) | 7 (6.9) | 5 |
| 283 (2) | 24 (23.8) | 14 |
| 289 (8) | 3 (2.9) | 2 |
| 277 + 283 | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 312 (1) | 24 (23.8) | 13 |
| 324 (4) | 4 (3.9) | 3 |
| 327 (5) | 3 (2.9) | 2 |
| 330 (2) | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 333 (6) | 8 (7.9) | 5 |
| 336 (3) | 8 (7.9) | 5 |
| 339 (7) | 51 (50.5) | 27 |
| 342 (8) | 2 (1.9) | 2 |
| 339 (7) | 54 (53.5) | 29 |
| 342 (8) | 8 (7.9) | 5 |
| 345 (2) | 23 (22.8) | 16 |
| 348 (9) | 3 (2.9) | 2 |
| 351 (3) | 8 (7.9) | 7 |
| 354 (4) | 2 (1.9) | 2 |
| 360 (10) | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 339 + 345 | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
| 339 + 351 | 1 (0.9) | 1 |
a Alleles were compared and numbered consecutively according to those identified within Cryptosporidium isolates from calves and lambs by Quílez et al. [25, 31] and Ramo et al. [32]
b Hunter-Gaston discriminatory power [discriminatory index (95% confidence interval)]
Multilocus subtypes (MLTs) of Cryptosporidium parvum isolates from pre-weaned lambs based on the combination of alleles at eleven VNTR loci and the GP60 marker.
| MLT | Allele at locus | No. of isolates (n = 100) | No. of farms (n = 46) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC6-7 | CP47 | Cgd1_ 3670 | 5B12 | ML1 | Cgd3_3850 | TP14 | MSB | Cgd6_ 3940 | Cgd6_ 5400 | ML2 | GP60 | |||
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 12 | 7 | 9 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 16 | 7 | 3 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
a The number allocation for alleles is indicated in Table 1
b Only those isolates typable at all loci were used for multilocus analyses. Samples with mixed infections at a single locus were allocated to the corresponding MLT
Fig 2Single-locus variant eBURST network for 74 multilocus subtypes (MLTs) identified among 100 Cryptosporidium parvum isolates from lambs.
Each MLT is represented by a dot, which is colored according to the number of isolates as shown in the key. Single-locus variants are joined by lines. Distance between dots is random and does not provide additional information. The allelic profile of each MLT is indicated in Table 2.