| Literature DB >> 18077222 |
Liam J Morrison1, Marianne E Mallon, Huw V Smith, Annette MacLeod, Lihua Xiao, Andy Tait.
Abstract
We genotyped 297 Scottish C. parvum samples using micro- and minisatellites. Treated as a single population, the population structure was epidemic. When regional populations were analysed, there was evidence of sub-population structure variations. This was dependent upon excluding sub-groups exhibiting significant genetic distance from the main population, implying genetic sub-structuring. We tested the hypothesis that these sub-groups originated outside the UK and demonstrated that one sub-group clustered with Peruvian samples. A geographically comprehensive panel of isolates would fully confirm this result. These data indicate limited sub-structuring within a small geographical area, but substantial sub-structuring over larger geographical distances. Host movement influences parasite diversity and population structure, evidenced by strong correlation (r(2) = 0.9686) between cattle movements and parasite diversity. Thus, the population structure of C. parvum is complex, with sub-populations differing in structure and being influenced by host movements, including the introduction of novel multilocus genotypes from geographically distinct regions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18077222 PMCID: PMC2684618 DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2007.10.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Genet Evol ISSN: 1567-1348 Impact factor: 3.342
Fig. 1Allele frequencies for microsatellite markers MM5 (graph A), MM18 (B), and MM19 (C), in the four populations studied, Orkney, Thurso, Aberdeenshire and Dumfries and Galloway (Dumf/Gall).
Fig. 2Dendrogram of multilocus genotypes (MLGs) 1-95 as generated by TREEVIEW from CLUSTERING CALCULATOR. Group A consists of samples from humans, cattle and sheep, while Group B consists of samples from humans only. Bootstrap values as calculated by CLUSTERING CALCULATOR are shown at the relevant node; only values greater than 70 are indicated. Outlier groups 1, 2 and 3 are also indicated.
Linkage equilibrium and disequilibrium in Scottish C. parvum populations
| Population | Analysis | Standardised | LE or LD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | ||||||
| Scotland | All | 297 | 0.1373 | 0.01 | Y | LD |
| Postcode | 199 | 0.1725 | 0.001 | Y | LD | |
| MLG | 132 | 0.1436 | 0.01 | Y | LD | |
| Scotland | All | 275 | 0.0313 | 0.01 | Y | LD |
| Postcode | 178 | 0.0058 | 0.05 | Y | LD | |
| MLG | 110 | −0.008 | 0.97 | N | LE | |
| B | ||||||
| Orkney | All | 68 | 0.0229 | 0.001 | Y | LD |
| Postcode | 30 | 0.0995 | 0.001 | Y | LD | |
| MLG | 14 | −0.0204 | 0.882 | N | LE | |
| Thurso | All | 96 | 0.0322 | 0.001 | Y | LD |
| Postcode | 46 | 0.0267 | 0.006 | Y | LD | |
| MLG | 28 | 0.0005 | 0.479 | N | LE | |
| Aberdeen | All | 70 | 0.1368 | 0.01 | Y | LD |
| Postcode | 65 | 0.1391 | 0.01 | Y | LD | |
| MLG | 48 | 0.1282 | 0.01 | Y | LD | |
| Aberdeen | All | 60 | 0.0087 | 0.159 | N | LE |
| Postcode | 55 | 0.0084 | 0.141 | N | LE | |
| MLG | 38 | −0.0137 | 0.91 | N | LE | |
| Dumf/Gall | All | 63 | 0.3869 | 0.001 | Y | LD |
| Postcode | 58 | 0.3968 | 0.01 | Y | LD | |
| MLG | 42 | 0.3014 | 0.001 | Y | LD | |
| Dumf/Gall | All | 50 | 0.0105 | 0.172 | N | LE |
| Postcode | 47 | 0.0088 | 0.196 | N | LE | |
| MLG | 32 | −0.0094 | 0.788 | N | LE | |
Level of analysis.
Abbreviations: standardised IA, standardised index of association; VD, variance of pairwise differences; L, 95% critical value for VD; LE, linkage equilibrium; LD, linkage disequilibrium; A, all samples; B, individual populations; MLG, multilocus genotype.
Populations with genetically distinct outliers removed.
Genetic distance (D) and FST (θ) values between Orkney, Thurso, Aberdeenshire and Dumfries and Galloway (Dumf/Gall)
| Measurement | Orkney | Thurso | Aberdeenshire | Dumf/Gall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | ||||
| 0.073153 | – | |||
| 0.064992 | 0.032677 | – | ||
| 0.072421 | 0.057286 | 0.003768 | – | |
| 0.069743 | 0.030613 | 0.006433 | 0.034208 | |
Genetically distinct Outlier Group samples removed from data set.
Genetic distance (D) and FST (θ) values between samples from Scotland, Outlier Groups 1, 2 and 3 and Peruvian samples
| Measurement | Scotland | Outliers 1 | Outliers 2 | Outliers 3 | Peru |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | 0.32831 | 0.71649 | 1.52109 | 2.39709 | |
| – | 0.126780 | 0.141847 | 0.175824 | 0.49689 | |
| 2.39709 | 2.14968 | 2.11402 | 0.9597 | – | |
| 0.49689 | 0.633505 | 0.612830 | 0.495611 | – | |
Fig. 3Dendrogram of multilocus genotypes including Peruvian samples. Enlarged section of dendrogram (indicated by dark rectangle on miniature) generated by TREEVIEW from CLUSTERING CALCULATOR. Peruvian isolates are indicated by *. Bootstrap values as calculated by CLUSTERING CALCULATOR are shown for major nodes.
Fig. 4Correlation of cattle movements and average number of alleles per locus. Cattle data from British Cattle Movement Service, DEFRA. Data were for cattle killed (on farm) in the study area that were born outside of any of the four study areas (*data for 2001 not included due to FMD outbreak). Shown are the goodness of fit value (r2), and 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines).