Stephen M McHugh1, E Gail Shaffer2, Daniel S Cormican3, Shawn T Beaman4, Patrick J Forte5, David G Metro6. 1. Adult Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellow, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. 2. Pediatric Anesthesiology Fellow, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. 3. Critical Care Medicine Fellow, University of Michigan Medical Center. 4. Associate Professor, Associate Residency Program Director, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. 6. Associate Professor, Residency Program Director, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The attitudes of residency applicants regarding social media resources and how these resources affect their decisions during residency selection have not been well-studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of electronic and social media resources by residency applicants and the impact of these resources on their residency selection decisions. METHODS: Interviewees at our anesthesiology residency program during the 2012-2013 interview cycle were surveyed anonymously regarding their use of electronic and social media resources. RESULTS: On a scale from 1 to 5 (1=not at all important, 5=very important), social media resources were given a ranking of 3 (2-3) (median [25%-75%]) for importance for gathering residency program information. Our Facebook page was accessed by 47% of respondents. Thirty-seven percent did so before applying and 58% did so after applying but before interviewing. The Facebook page was useful to 12% when deciding whether to apply to our program, 25% when deciding whether to interview, and 29% when deciding where to rank our program on their rank order list. Participants who responded that our Facebook page was useful in three domains (applying, interviewing, and ranking) credited it for increasing the likelihood that they applied to, interviewed at, and preferentially ranked our program. CONCLUSIONS: Social media resources serve a valuable role for residency applicants. Applicants who accessed our program's Facebook page reported that it made them more likely to apply to our program, interview at our program, and that it increased the position of our program on their rank order lists.
BACKGROUND: The attitudes of residency applicants regarding social media resources and how these resources affect their decisions during residency selection have not been well-studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of electronic and social media resources by residency applicants and the impact of these resources on their residency selection decisions. METHODS: Interviewees at our anesthesiology residency program during the 2012-2013 interview cycle were surveyed anonymously regarding their use of electronic and social media resources. RESULTS: On a scale from 1 to 5 (1=not at all important, 5=very important), social media resources were given a ranking of 3 (2-3) (median [25%-75%]) for importance for gathering residency program information. Our Facebook page was accessed by 47% of respondents. Thirty-seven percent did so before applying and 58% did so after applying but before interviewing. The Facebook page was useful to 12% when deciding whether to apply to our program, 25% when deciding whether to interview, and 29% when deciding where to rank our program on their rank order list. Participants who responded that our Facebook page was useful in three domains (applying, interviewing, and ranking) credited it for increasing the likelihood that they applied to, interviewed at, and preferentially ranked our program. CONCLUSIONS: Social media resources serve a valuable role for residency applicants. Applicants who accessed our program's Facebook page reported that it made them more likely to apply to our program, interview at our program, and that it increased the position of our program on their rank order lists.
Authors: Lindsay A Thompson; Kara Dawson; Richard Ferdig; Erik W Black; J Boyer; Jade Coutts; Nicole Paradise Black Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrew L Barker; Hania Wehbe-Janek; Naumit S Bhandari; Timothy M Bittenbinder; ChanHee Jo; Russell K McAllister Journal: J Clin Anesth Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 9.452
Authors: Joseph C Brinkman; David G Deckey; Sailesh V Tummala; Jeffrey D Hassebrock; Mark J Spangehl; Joshua S Bingham Journal: JB JS Open Access Date: 2022-05-13
Authors: Alisa Malyavko; Yumin Kim; Tara G Harmon; Theodore Quan; Alex Gu; Simone A Bernstein; Sean A Tabaie; Savyasachi Thakkar Journal: JB JS Open Access Date: 2021-09-08
Authors: Erin M White; Stefanie C Rohde; Nensi M Ruzgar; Shin Mei Chan; Andrew C Esposito; Kristin D Oliveira; Peter S Yoo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240