Literature DB >> 22515757

Residency selection: do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match?

Pauline H Go1, Zachary Klaassen, Ronald S Chamberlain.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the practices and perceptions of US residency programme directors (PDs) and residency applicants with reference to the use of social media and Internet resources in the resident doctor selection process.
METHODS: A survey was distributed via e-mail (SurveyMonkey®) to 2592 PDs of programmes in 22 specialties accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. A separate survey was distributed to all residency candidates applying for postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) positions at the Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey.
RESULTS: A total of 1200 (46.3%) PDs completed the survey. Overall, 16.3% (n=196) of respondents reported visiting Internet resources to gain more information about applicants, 38.1% (74 of 194) of whom had ranked an applicant lower as a result. American medical graduates (AMGs), US international medical graduates (USIMGs) and non-USIMGs all felt that performance on Step 1 of the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) was a critical aspect of a residency application. More AMGs than USIMGs and non-USIMGs believed that PDs made use of social media resources when evaluating applicants and that their online profiles might influence their rankings.
CONCLUSIONS: Residency candidates universally understand the importance of USMLE Step 1 scores in maintaining a competitive application. However, significant differences exist among AMGs, USIMGs and non-USIMGs in their perceptions of the value of other applicant criteria, which may place some applicants at a disadvantage. A small but growing number of PDs currently use Internet resources to learn more about applicants and base their recruitment decisions in part on the information they encounter. At present, applicants are generally unaware of the implications their online activity may have on their selection for residency. Content guideline programmes that raise awareness of the possible impact of social media on the residency recruitment process are needed and should be delivered early in medical education. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22515757     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  10 in total

1.  Use of social media resources by applicants during the residency selection process.

Authors:  Stephen M McHugh; E Gail Shaffer; Daniel S Cormican; Shawn T Beaman; Patrick J Forte; David G Metro
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2014-01-01

2.  Clerkship Grading and the U.S. Economy: What Medical Education Can Learn From America's Economic History.

Authors:  Michael S Ryan; E Marshall Brooks; Komal Safdar; Sally A Santen
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 3.  The Use of Social Media in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Madeline Sterling; Peggy Leung; Drew Wright; Tara F Bishop
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  What's on YOUR Facebook profile? Evaluation of an educational intervention to promote appropriate use of privacy settings by medical students on social networking sites.

Authors:  Jennifer M Walton; Jonathan White; Shelley Ross
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-07-20

5.  Exploring social media and admissions decision-making - friends or foes?

Authors:  Marcus Law; Maria Mylopoulos; Paula Veinot; Daniel Miller; Mark D Hanson
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2016-10-18

6.  Are We Witnessing a Paradigm Shift?: A Systematic Review of Social Media in Residency.

Authors:  James M Economides; Youna K Choi; Kenneth L Fan; Arjun P Kanuri; David H Song
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-19

Review 7.  To the Point: advising students applying to Obstetrics and Gynecology residency in 2020 and beyond.

Authors:  Celeste S Royce; Elise N Everett; LaTasha B Craig; Angela Fleming; David A Forstein; Scott C Graziano; B Star Hampton; Laura Hopkins; Margaret L McKenzie; Helen K Morgan; Shireen Madani Sims; Christopher Morosky
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Study Habits of Highly Effective Medical Students.

Authors:  Khalid A Bin Abdulrahman; Ahmad M Khalaf; Fahad B Bin Abbas; Omran T Alanazi
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-06-08

Review 9.  The impact of social media on medical professionalism: a systematic qualitative review of challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Fatemeh Gholami-Kordkheili; Verina Wild; Daniel Strech
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  The association of USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores with residency match specialty and location.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Gauer; J Brooks Jackson
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.