| Literature DB >> 27172166 |
Dirk Mueller1, Wouter A P Breeman2, Ingo Klette3, Michael Gottschaldt4,5, Andreas Odparlik1, Manfred Baehre1, Izabela Tworowska6, Michael K Schultz7.
Abstract
Gallium-68 ((68)Ga) is a generator-produced radionuclide with a short half-life (t½ = 68 min) that is particularly well suited for molecular imaging by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods have been developed to synthesize (68)Ga-labeled imaging agents possessing certain drawbacks, such as longer synthesis time because of a required final purification step, the use of organic solvents or concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl). In our manuscript, we provide a detailed protocol for the use of an advantageous sodium chloride (NaCl)-based method for radiolabeling of chelator-modified peptides for molecular imaging. By working in a lead-shielded hot-cell system,(68)Ga(3+) of the generator eluate is trapped on a cation exchanger cartridge (100 mg, ∼8 mm long and 5 mm diameter) and then eluted with acidified 5 M NaCl solution directly into a sodium acetate-buffered solution containing a DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) or DOTA-like chelator-modified peptide. The main advantages of this procedure are the high efficiency and the absence of organic solvents. It can be applied to a variety of peptides, which are stable in 1 M NaCl solution at a pH value of 3-4 during reaction. After labeling, neutralization, sterile filtration and quality control (instant thin-layer chromatography (iTLC), HPLC and pH), the radiopharmaceutical can be directly administered to patients, without determination of organic solvents, which reduces the overall synthesis-to-release time. This procedure has been adapted easily to automated synthesis modules, which leads to a rapid preparation of (68)Ga radiopharmaceuticals (12-16 min).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27172166 PMCID: PMC5506837 DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2016.060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Protoc ISSN: 1750-2799 Impact factor: 13.491
Labeling methods.
| Method | Ion exchanger | Elution solution ion exchanger | Buffer | Advantages/limitations | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fractional elution | _ | _ | HEPES | (+) No preconcentration is required | |
| (−) Only ∼80% of activity is available for labeling | ||||||
| (−) Final purification is required | ||||||
| (−) The final product contains ethanol | ||||||
| 2 | Anionic method | SAX | ∼0.4 ml water | HEPES | (+) The method delivers 68Ga in high chemical purity | |
| (−) Handling with concentrated HCl is necessary | ||||||
| (−) Final purification is required | ||||||
| (−) The final product contains ethanol | ||||||
| 3 | Cationic method (acetone) | SCX | 0.5 ml of acetone/HCl | HEPES | (+) The method is well established | |
| (−) Final purification is required | ||||||
| (−) The final product contains ethanol and other side products | ||||||
| (±) The method is licensed for Eckert & Ziegler | ||||||
| 4 | Cationic method (ethanol) | SCX | 1 ml of ethanol/HCl | HEPES, ammonium acetate | (+) Because of the low concentration of foreign ions in the reaction mixture, high specific activities are achievable | |
| (−) The final product contains ethanol | ||||||
| (±) The method is licensed for Eckert & Ziegler | ||||||
| 5 | Combined cationic-anionic method | (1) SCX(2) SAX | (1) 0.4 ml of 4 M HCl(2) ∼0.4 ml of water | HEPES | (+) Because of the low concentration of foreign ions in the reaction mixture, high specific activities are achievable | |
| (−) Handling of 7 M HCl is required | ||||||
| (−) The final product contains ethanol | ||||||
| (−) Two steps of postprocessing 68Ga eluate are needed | ||||||
| 6 | Cationic method (NaCl) | SCX | 0.5 ml of 5 M NaCl/0.1 M HCl | Ammonium acetate, sodium acetate | (+) No organic solvents are found in the final product | |
| (+) High specific activities are routinely achievable | ||||||
| (±) The reaction mixture usually contains 1 M sodium chloride, which could be disadvantageous for NaCl-sensitive peptides |
Figure 1Schematic drawing of the NaCl-based labeling procedure for the labeling of DOTA- or NOTA-conjugated peptides with 68Ga.
Figure 2Preconditioning of the SCX cartridge, SCX cartridge with Luer-lock barb fitting.
Troubleshooting table.
| step(s) | problem | solution |
|---|---|---|
| Steps 7 and 8 | Unchelated 68Ga is discovered in the solution | Take a sample and measure its pH. The final pH during the reaction should be between 3 and 4. If the pH is <3, add sodium acetate buffer (Reagent Setup) to the reaction mixture stepwise in 100-ml aliquots until the pH is between 3 and 4. If the pH is higher than 4, adjust the pH with diluted HCl or use a lower amount of sodium acetate buffer for the next labeling so that the pH of the reaction mixture is between 3 and 4 After re-adjusting the pH of the reaction mixture, incubate the reaction solution for an additional 7 min and analyze an aliquot by radio-iTLC and/or radio-HPLC. |
| Unchelated 68Ga is still present in the solution after control of the pH of the reaction mixture | Incubate the reaction solution for an additional 5 min and analyze another aliquot by radio-iTLC and/or radio-HPLC | |
| Unchelated 68Ga is still present in the solution after the additional incubation | Add 5–7 nmol DOTA-like conjugated peptide (if specific activity is not a main focus) and incubate for an additional 5 min. Analyze another aliquot by radio-iTLC and/or radio-HPLC | |
| Steps 7–9 | Unchelated 68Ga is still present in the solution after incubation with additional peptide | Apply the reaction mixture to an activated SPE (e.g., Sep-Pak) cartridge |
| Steps 7 and 8 | Unchelated 68Ga is present in the solution and you suspect that this is due to iron contamination of the reaction mixture | Check all used reagents for iron contamination (including the generator eluate and other components (e.g., reaction vial)) using a colorimetric test ( |
| Steps 7–10 | Multiple radioactive peaks are observed from a sample that is known to be analytically pure and free of isomers | Radiolysis may be occurring. Add ∼5 mg of a radical scavenger to the original reaction buffer and start the labeling procedure again. Possible radical scavengers include ascorbic acid, ethanol, gentisic acid and methionine |
Sep-Pak purification of the labeled peptide: If a Sep-Pak C-18 cartridge is required to remove unreacted Ga3+, it should be activated by preconditioning with ethanol. For this purpose, rinse the cartridge with 5 ml of ethanol and then with 5 ml of water (‘for injection’ quality). Transfer the reaction mixture through the C-18 cartridge and rinse the cartridge again with 2 ml of water (‘for injection’ quality). After elution of the 68Ga-labeled peptide with ethanol, it is essential to either remove the organic solvent from the resulting solution or to dilute the solution with isotonic saline solution before using the labeled compound as a radiopharmaceutical for animal studies or patient administration. The solvent can be evaporated by allowing a gentle stream of inert gas (helium, argon or nitrogen) to pass over the solution. To avoid adherence of the labeled peptide onto the inner surface of the reaction vial, the solution should not be concentrated to dryness.
Figure 3An example of a radio-iTLC chromatogram of [68Ga]-DOTATOC using the iTLC method described in Box 2 (mobile phase consisting of 1 M ammonium acetate/methanol 1:1 vol/vol). The 68Ga-labeled peptide has an approximate retardation factor of 0.8–1.0.
Figure 4An example of a HPLC chromatogram of [68Ga]-DOTATOC using the HPLC system previously described, a mobile phase consisting of 0.1% TFA in 5% acetonitrile/water (solution A) and 0.01% TFA in 95% acetonitrile/water (solution B) and a gradient from 0–2 min 100% A, 2–15 min to 100% B (flow rate: 1.2 ml/min). The 68Ga-labeled peptide has an approximate retention time of 9 ± 3 min (refs. 13,14).
Figure 5Elution profile of the 68Ge/68Ga generator and formation of 68Ga. 10 h after the former elution, there is an equilibrium of formation of 68Ga and decay to 68Zn, and the maximum of the elutable activity of 68Ga is reached. By two half-lives after the former elution, 75% of the maximum 68Ga activity is already elutable from the generator.
Figure 6Progress of 68Ga activity during one automated synthesis run for the routine pharmaceutical production of 68Ga-DOTATOC—synthesis time: 14 min, time until application: 20 min (vertical black line), start activity: 1.85 GBq, activity after synthesis: 1.20 GBq, applicable activity for patients: 1.13 GBq (horizontal black line). Blue line: progress of eluted activity of 68Ga that is used for the automated synthesis run. Red line: regeneration of 68Ga activity in the 68Ge/68Ga generator after elution. The loss of activity at the end of the synthesis results from the loss of final product due to adsorption processes during the sterile filtration and in the synthesis module and also because of the taken samples for the quality control.
Figure 7Progress of activity of sequentially performed synthesis runs for the routine pharmaceutical production of 68Ga-DOTATOC—first start activity: 1.85 GBq, activity after first synthesis: 1.20 GBq, first applicable activity (20 min, vertical black line): 1.13 GBq (horizontal black line), second start activity: 1.31 GBq, activity after second synthesis: 0.85 GBq, second applicable activity (140 min, vertical black line): 0.80 GBq (horizontal black line). Blue line: progress of eluted activity on 68Ga that is used for the automated synthesis run. Red line: regeneration of 68Ga activity in the 68Ge/68Ga generator after elution.
Figure 8Decay of 68Ga and formation of 68Zn. (a) Calculated formation of 68Ga and 68Zn as f (time) in hours after elution of a 50 mCi (1.85 GBq) 68Ge/68Ga generator. The specific activity of 68Ga corresponds to 9.81 × 10−15 mol/MBq. (b) Calculated molar ratio of 68Zn versus 68Ga as f (time) in hours after post-prior elution of 50 mCi (1.85 GBq) 68Ga of a 68Ge/68Ga generator. In theory, 3 d after post-prior elution the molar ratio of [68Zn]/[68Ga] = 43.