Timon Hussain1,2, Linda T Nguyen1, Michael Whitney3, Jonathan Hasselmann1, Quyen T Nguyen1,4. 1. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 3. Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A. 4. Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Additional intraoperative guidance could reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury during parotid gland cancer surgery. We evaluated the intraoperative use of fluorescently labeled nerve binding peptide NP41 to aid facial nerve identification and preservation during parotidectomy in an orthotopic model of murine parotid gland cancer. We also quantified the accuracy of intraoperative nerve detection for surface and buried nerves in the head and neck with NP41 versus white light (WL) alone. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-eight mice underwent parotid gland cancer surgeries with additional fluorescence (FL) guidance versus WL reflectance (WLR) alone. Eight mice were used for additional nerve-imaging experiments. METHODS: Twenty-eight parotid tumor-bearing mice underwent parotidectomy. Eight mice underwent imaging of both sides of the face after skin removal. Postoperative assessment of facial nerve function measured by automated whisker tracking were compared between FL guidance (n = 13) versus WL alone (n=15). In eight mice, nerve to surrounding tissue contrast was measured under FL versus WLR for all nerve branches detectable in the field of view. RESULTS: Postoperative facial nerve function after parotid gland cancer surgery tended to be better with additional FL guidance. Fluorescent labeling significantly improved nerve to surrounding tissue contrast for both large and smaller buried nerve branches compared to WLR visualization and improved detection sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: NP41 FL imaging significantly aids the intraoperative identification of nerve braches otherwise nearly invisible to the naked eye. Its application in a murine model of parotid gland cancer surgery tended to improve functional preservation of the facial nerve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 126:2711-2717, 2016.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Additional intraoperative guidance could reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury during parotid gland cancer surgery. We evaluated the intraoperative use of fluorescently labeled nerve binding peptide NP41 to aid facial nerve identification and preservation during parotidectomy in an orthotopic model of murineparotid gland cancer. We also quantified the accuracy of intraoperative nerve detection for surface and buried nerves in the head and neck with NP41 versus white light (WL) alone. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-eight mice underwent parotid gland cancer surgeries with additional fluorescence (FL) guidance versus WL reflectance (WLR) alone. Eight mice were used for additional nerve-imaging experiments. METHODS: Twenty-eight parotid tumor-bearing mice underwent parotidectomy. Eight mice underwent imaging of both sides of the face after skin removal. Postoperative assessment of facial nerve function measured by automated whisker tracking were compared between FL guidance (n = 13) versus WL alone (n=15). In eight mice, nerve to surrounding tissue contrast was measured under FL versus WLR for all nerve branches detectable in the field of view. RESULTS: Postoperative facial nerve function after parotid gland cancer surgery tended to be better with additional FL guidance. Fluorescent labeling significantly improved nerve to surrounding tissue contrast for both large and smaller buried nerve branches compared to WLR visualization and improved detection sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: NP41 FL imaging significantly aids the intraoperative identification of nerve braches otherwise nearly invisible to the naked eye. Its application in a murine model of parotid gland cancer surgery tended to improve functional preservation of the facial nerve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 126:2711-2717, 2016.
Authors: M Magnano; C F gervasio; L Cravero; G Machetta; W Lerda; G Beltramo; R Orecchia; R Ragona; M Bussi Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Jeffrey D Moore; Martin Deschênes; Takahiro Furuta; Daniel Huber; Matthew C Smear; Maxime Demers; David Kleinfeld Journal: Nature Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Antonio Moretti; Leonardo Citraro; Anna Grazia Petrucci; Pamela Di Giovanni; Roberta Di Mauro; Pier Giorgio Giacomini Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Timon Hussain; Melina B Mastrodimos; Sharat C Raju; Heather L Glasgow; Michael Whitney; Beth Friedman; Jeffrey D Moore; David Kleinfeld; Paul Steinbach; Karen Messer; Minya Pu; Roger Y Tsien; Quyen T Nguyen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rachel A Levin; Csilla N Felsen; Jin Yang; John Y Lin; Michael A Whitney; Quyen T Nguyen; Roger Y Tsien Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kiranya E Tipirneni; Jason M Warram; Lindsay S Moore; Andrew C Prince; Esther de Boer; Aditi H Jani; Irene L Wapnir; Joseph C Liao; Michael Bouvet; Nicole K Behnke; Mary T Hawn; George A Poultsides; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; William R Carroll; Kurt R Zinn; Eben Rosenthal Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Carl E Silver; Jovanna Thielker; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Carol R Bradford; Remco De Bree; Luis P Kowalski; Kerry D Olsen; Miquel Quer; Alessandra Rinaldo; Juan R Rodrigo; Alvaro Sanabria; Ashok R Shaha; Robert P Takes; Vincent Vander Poorten; Peter Zbären; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: K W T K Chin; A F Engelsman; P T K Chin; S L Meijer; S D Strackee; R J Oostra; T M van Gulik Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Junior Gonzales; Giacomo Pirovano; Chun Yuen Chow; Paula Demetrio de Souza Franca; Lukas M Carter; Julie K Klint; Navjot Guru; Jason S Lewis; Glenn F King; Thomas Reiner Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.138