Literature DB >> 16785410

Great auricular nerve morbidity after nerve sacrifice during parotidectomy.

William R Ryan1, Willard E Fee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the extent, timing, and patient perspectives of great auricular nerve (GAN) morbidity and recovery after nerve sacrifice during parotidectomy during the first postoperative year.
DESIGN: Prospective series.
SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. Patients Twenty-seven consecutive patients who underwent parotidectomy with GAN sacrifice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively, we performed light touch sensation tests on each patient to develop an ink map representing anesthesia and paresthesia in the GAN sensory territory; patients also completed an outcomes questionnaire.
RESULTS: Twenty-two (81%) of 27 patients completed follow-up. The prevalence and average area of anesthesia decreased continually during the first year according to sensory testing and patient scoring. Half of the patients had no anesthesia at 12 months. The prevalence and average area of paresthesia increased during the first year according to sensory testing; however, the contiguity and subjective scoring of paresthesia peaked at 6 months and decreased in subsequent follow-up points. Throughout the first year, patients had difficulty using the telephone, shaving, combing their hair, wearing earrings, and sleeping on the operative side because of both anesthesia and paresthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: The impact of GAN sacrifice morbidity on patient quality of life is tolerable and improves during the first postoperative year. However, we feel that GAN morbidity may be bothersome enough to warrant efforts to preserve the posterior branch of the GAN when possible and appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16785410     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.132.6.642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  7 in total

1.  Hidden scar or its absence: is it always safe?

Authors:  Alexander Asanau; Andrei P Timoshenko
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Effects of an antiadhesive agent on functional recovery of the greater auricular nerve after parotidectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Inn-Chul Nam; Young-Hoon Joo; Jung-Hae Cho; Choung-Soo Kim; Sang-Yeon Kim; Geun-Jeon Kim; Young-Hak Park; Dong-Il Sun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Improved facial nerve identification during parotidectomy with fluorescently labeled peptide.

Authors:  Timon Hussain; Linda T Nguyen; Michael Whitney; Jonathan Hasselmann; Quyen T Nguyen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  [Diagnosis and management of pain syndromes following parotidectomy].

Authors:  R Linke; B Wollenberg; U Schröder
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  The role of neural precursor cells and self assembling peptides in nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Xiao Zhao; Gordon S Yao; Yang Liu; Jian Wang; Kajana Satkunendrarajah; Michael Fehlings
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-19

6.  Variation of the Great Auricular Nerve and Prediction of the Facial Nerve Trunk Size.

Authors:  Krist Kriengkraikasem; Kritsada Kowitwibool; Malee Chanpoo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-17

7.  Improving the quality of life of parotid surgery patients through a modified facelift incision and great auricular nerve preservation.

Authors:  Kai J Lorenz; Pia A Behringer; Dörte Höcherl; Frank Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2013-12-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.