Orlando Guntinas-Lichius1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany. orlando.guntinas@uni-koeln.de
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The face is the mirror of personality. Facial expression is the most important part of verbal and nonverbal communication. Patients with head and neck neoplasm and facial palsy are more stigmatized by the latter than by the tumor itself. Facial nerve reconstruction in such a patient is a great challenge. This review gives an overview of the assessment of facial palsy, surgical reconstruction, and postoperative treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: MRI, CT, and electromyography are indispensable tools in the assessment of preoperative facial palsy in patients with head and neck neoplasm. When part of the facial nerve has to be sacrificed during surgery, the best functional results are achieved with direct facial nerve suture, interposition graft, or by a hypoglossal-facial nerve interposition jump anastomosis. The latter is the best choice when the reanimation is planned between 6 months and 2 years after tumor surgery. In any case, the eye is best rehabilitated with upper lid loading. Temporalis muscle transposition gives fast and good results for the restoration of the corner of the mouth after radical surgery. Reanimation by free muscle transfer for head and neck cancer patients is rarely indicated. Botulinum toxin treatment is an excellent postoperative aid for refining the result; the optimal modality of postoperative physiotherapy is still unclear. SUMMARY: Surgical reanimation of the face in head and neck patients has reached a high standard. Strategies to decrease misdirected reinnervation after nerve suture have to be established in clinical practice for further improvement of facial rehabilitation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The face is the mirror of personality. Facial expression is the most important part of verbal and nonverbal communication. Patients with head and neck neoplasm and facial palsy are more stigmatized by the latter than by the tumor itself. Facial nerve reconstruction in such a patient is a great challenge. This review gives an overview of the assessment of facial palsy, surgical reconstruction, and postoperative treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: MRI, CT, and electromyography are indispensable tools in the assessment of preoperative facial palsy in patients with head and neck neoplasm. When part of the facial nerve has to be sacrificed during surgery, the best functional results are achieved with direct facial nerve suture, interposition graft, or by a hypoglossal-facial nerve interposition jump anastomosis. The latter is the best choice when the reanimation is planned between 6 months and 2 years after tumor surgery. In any case, the eye is best rehabilitated with upper lid loading. Temporalis muscle transposition gives fast and good results for the restoration of the corner of the mouth after radical surgery. Reanimation by free muscle transfer for head and neck cancerpatients is rarely indicated. Botulinum toxin treatment is an excellent postoperative aid for refining the result; the optimal modality of postoperative physiotherapy is still unclear. SUMMARY: Surgical reanimation of the face in head and neck patients has reached a high standard. Strategies to decrease misdirected reinnervation after nerve suture have to be established in clinical practice for further improvement of facial rehabilitation.
Authors: H Bendella; S P Pavlov; M Grosheva; A Irintchev; S K Angelova; D Merkel; N Sinis; K Kaidoglou; E Skouras; S A Dunlop; Doychin N Angelov Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Carl E Silver; Jovanna Thielker; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Carol R Bradford; Remco De Bree; Luis P Kowalski; Kerry D Olsen; Miquel Quer; Alessandra Rinaldo; Juan R Rodrigo; Alvaro Sanabria; Ashok R Shaha; Robert P Takes; Vincent Vander Poorten; Peter Zbären; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Timon Hussain; Linda T Nguyen; Michael Whitney; Jonathan Hasselmann; Quyen T Nguyen Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.325