Literature DB >> 27170823

Decision-Making and Problem-Solving Approaches in Pharmacy Education.

Lindsay C Martin1, Krista L Donohoe2, David A Holdford2.   

Abstract

Domain 3 of the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) 2013 Educational Outcomes recommends that pharmacy school curricula prepare students to be better problem solvers, but are silent on the type of problems they should be prepared to solve. We identified five basic approaches to problem solving in the curriculum at a pharmacy school: clinical, ethical, managerial, economic, and legal. These approaches were compared to determine a generic process that could be applied to all pharmacy decisions. Although there were similarities in the approaches, generic problem solving processes may not work for all problems. Successful problem solving requires identification of the problems faced and application of the right approach to the situation. We also advocate that the CAPE Outcomes make explicit the importance of different approaches to problem solving. Future pharmacists will need multiple approaches to problem solving to adapt to the complexity of health care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAPE outcomes; decision-making; pharmacy education; problem-solving

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27170823      PMCID: PMC4857647          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  4 in total

1.  Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Cecilia M Plaza; Cindy D Stowe; Evan T Robinson; Gary DeLander; Diane E Beck; Russell B Melchert; Robert B Supernaw; Victoria F Roche; Brenda L Gleason; Mark N Strong; Amanda Bain; Gerald E Meyer; Betty J Dong; Jeffrey Rochon; Patty Johnston
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Assessment of students' critical-thinking and problem-solving abilities across a 6-year doctor of pharmacy program.

Authors:  Brenda L Gleason; Claude J Gaebelein; Gloria R Grice; Andrew J Crannage; Margaret A Weck; Peter Hurd; Brenda Walter; Wendy Duncan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  The role of analogy-guided learning experiences in enhancing students' clinical decision-making skills.

Authors:  Bonnie Gilbert Edelen; Alexandra Alice Bell
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.726

4.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  The impact of drug order complexity on prospective medication order review and verification time.

Authors:  David S Dakwa; Vincent D Marshall; Bruce W Chaffee
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  An Individual Development Plan for Pharmacy Students for Career Planning and Tracking Accreditation Standards.

Authors:  Deanna Gee; Margaret Schulte; Rae R Matsumoto
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  A Pharmacotherapy Capstone Course to Target Student Learning and Programmatic Curricular Assessment.

Authors:  Joseph J Saseen; Sunny A Linnebur; Laura M Borgelt; Jennifer Trujillo; Douglas N Fish; Scott Mueller
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Community pharmacy ethical practice in Jordan: assessing attitude, needs and barriers.

Authors:  Rajaa A Al-Qudah; Omar Tuza; Haneen Tawfiek; Betty Chaar; Iman A Basheti
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2019-03-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.