Literature DB >> 31626294

The impact of drug order complexity on prospective medication order review and verification time.

David S Dakwa1, Vincent D Marshall2, Bruce W Chaffee1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess if the amount of time a pharmacist spends verifying medication orders increases as medication orders become more complex.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted by observing pharmacist verification of adult medication orders in an academic medical center. Drug order complexity was prospectively defined and validated using a classification system derived from 3 factors: the degree of order variability, ISMP high-alert classification, and a pharmacist perception survey. Screen capture software was used to measure pharmacist order review time for each classification. The annualized volume of low complexity drug orders was used to calculate the potential time savings if these were verified using an alternate system that did not require pharmacist review.
RESULTS: The primary study hypothesis was not achieved. Regression results did not show statistical significance for moderate (n = 30, 23.7 seconds, sd = 23.3) or high complexity (n = 30, 18.6 seconds, sd = 23.1) drugs relative to the low complexity drugs (n = 30, 8.0 seconds, sd = 14.4) nor for moderate vs high complexity; (βmoderate vs low = 15.6, P = .113), (βhigh vs low = 10.3, P = .235), (βmoderate vs high = 5.3, P = .737). The sensitivity analysis showed statistical significance in the high vs low comparison (βhigh vs low = 13.8, P = .017). DISCUSSION: This study showed that verifying pharmacists spent less time than projected to verify medication orders of different complexities, but the time did not correlate with the classifications used in our complexity scale. Several mitigating factors, including operational aspects associated with timing antimicrobial orders, likely influenced order verification time. These factors should be evaluated in future studies which seek to define drug order complexity and optimize pharmacist time spent in medication order verification.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that there may be other factors involved in pharmacist decision-making that should be considered when categorizing drugs by perceived complexity.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  cognitive effort; decision-making approaches; drug order complexity; medication order review; pharmacist time

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31626294      PMCID: PMC7647271          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  22 in total

1.  Clinical reasoning - a guide to improving teaching and practice.

Authors:  Andrew Linn; Carole Khaw; Hugh Kildea; Anne Tonkin
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

2.  Automating order review is delegation, not abdication.

Authors:  Dennis A Tribble
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Creatively using our intellectual capital.

Authors:  Paul G Pierpaoli
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.637

4.  Medication errors: prevention using information technology systems.

Authors:  Abha Agrawal
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Prescribing errors in hospital practice.

Authors:  Mary P Tully
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Methodological variability in detecting prescribing errors and consequences for the evaluation of interventions.

Authors:  Bryony Dean Franklin; Sylvia Birch; Imogen Savage; Ian Wong; Maria Woloshynowych; Ann Jacklin; Nick Barber
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Commonalities between Perception and Cognition.

Authors:  Michela C Tacca
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-30

9.  Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Alison Edwards; Sarah Nosal; Diane Hauser; Elizabeth Mauer; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Thinking in Pharmacy Practice: A Study of Community Pharmacists' Clinical Reasoning in Medication Supply Using the Think-Aloud Method.

Authors:  Hayley Croft; Conor Gilligan; Rohan Rasiah; Tracy Levett-Jones; Jennifer Schneider
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.