Ahmad El-Hellani1,2, Rola Salman2,3, Rachel El-Hage1,2, Soha Talih2,3, Nathalie Malek2,4, Rima Baalbaki1,2, Nareg Karaoghlanian2,3, Rima Nakkash2,4, Alan Shihadeh2,3, Najat A Saliba1,2. 1. Chemistry Department, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 2. Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. 3. Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 4. Department of Health Promotion and Community Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Abstract
Introduction: Available in hundreds of device designs and thousands of flavors, electronic cigarette (ECIG) may have differing toxicant emission characteristics. This study assesses nicotine and carbonyl yields in the most popular brands in the U.S. market. These products included disposable, prefilled cartridge, and tank-based ECIGs. Methods: Twenty-seven ECIG products of 10 brands were procured and their power outputs were measured. The e-liquids were characterized for pH, nicotine concentration, propylene glycol/vegetable glycerin (PG/VG) ratio, and water content. Aerosols were generated using a puffing machine and nicotine and carbonyls were, respectively, quantified using gas chromatograph and high-performance liquid chromatography. A multiregression model was used to interpret the data. Results: Nicotine yields varied from 0.27 to 2.91 mg/15 puffs, a range corresponding to the nicotine yield of less than 1 to more than 3 combustible cigarettes. Nicotine yield was highly correlated with ECIG type and brand, liquid nicotine concentration, and PG/VG ratio, and to a lower significance with electrical power, but not with pH and water content. Carbonyls, including the carcinogen formaldehyde, were detected in all ECIG aerosols, with total carbonyl concentrations ranging from 3.72 to 48.85 µg/15 puffs. Unlike nicotine, carbonyl concentrations were mainly correlated with power. Conclusion: In 15 puffs, some ECIG devices emit nicotine quantities that exceed those of tobacco cigarettes. Nicotine emissions vary widely across products but carbonyl emissions showed little variations. In spite of that ECIG users are exposed to toxicologically significant levels of carbonyl compounds, especially formaldehyde. Regression analysis showed the importance of design and e-liquid characteristics as determinants of nicotine and carbonyl emissions. Implications: Periodic surveying of characteristics of ECIG products available in the marketplace is valuable for understanding population-wide changes in ECIG use patterns over time.
Introduction: Available in hundreds of device designs and thousands of flavors, electronic cigarette (ECIG) may have differing toxicant emission characteristics. This study assesses nicotine and carbonyl yields in the most popular brands in the U.S. market. These products included disposable, prefilled cartridge, and tank-based ECIGs. Methods: Twenty-seven ECIG products of 10 brands were procured and their power outputs were measured. The e-liquids were characterized for pH, nicotine concentration, propylene glycol/vegetable glycerin (PG/VG) ratio, and water content. Aerosols were generated using a puffing machine and nicotine and carbonyls were, respectively, quantified using gas chromatograph and high-performance liquid chromatography. A multiregression model was used to interpret the data. Results:Nicotine yields varied from 0.27 to 2.91 mg/15 puffs, a range corresponding to the nicotine yield of less than 1 to more than 3 combustible cigarettes. Nicotine yield was highly correlated with ECIG type and brand, liquid nicotine concentration, and PG/VG ratio, and to a lower significance with electrical power, but not with pH and water content. Carbonyls, including the carcinogen formaldehyde, were detected in all ECIG aerosols, with total carbonyl concentrations ranging from 3.72 to 48.85 µg/15 puffs. Unlike nicotine, carbonyl concentrations were mainly correlated with power. Conclusion: In 15 puffs, some ECIG devices emit nicotine quantities that exceed those of tobacco cigarettes. Nicotine emissions vary widely across products but carbonyl emissions showed little variations. In spite of that ECIG users are exposed to toxicologically significant levels of carbonyl compounds, especially formaldehyde. Regression analysis showed the importance of design and e-liquid characteristics as determinants of nicotine and carbonyl emissions. Implications: Periodic surveying of characteristics of ECIG products available in the marketplace is valuable for understanding population-wide changes in ECIG use patterns over time.
Authors: Carolina P Ramôa; Marzena M Hiler; Tory R Spindle; Alexa A Lopez; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Thokozeni Lipato; Alison B Breland; Alan Shihadeh; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Tob Control Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Jakub Knysak; Michal Gawron; Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Jolanta Kurek; Adam Prokopowicz; Magdalena Jablonska-Czapla; Czeslawa Rosik-Dulewska; Christopher Havel; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Suzaynn F Schick; Benjamin C Blount; Peyton Jacob; Najat A Saliba; John T Bernert; Ahmad El Hellani; Peter Jatlow; R Steven Pappas; Lanqing Wang; Jonathan Foulds; Arunava Ghosh; Stephen S Hecht; John C Gomez; Jessica R Martin; Clementina Mesaros; Sanjay Srivastava; Gideon St Helen; Robert Tarran; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Ian A Blair; Heather L Kimmel; Claire M Doerschuk; Neal L Benowitz; Aruni Bhatnagar Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Melissa D Blank; Jennifer Pearson; Caroline O Cobb; Nicholas J Felicione; Marzena M Hiler; Tory R Spindle; Alison Breland Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Zhi Yang; Sara Schiff; Jennifer Unger; Tess Boley Cruz; Robert Urman; Junhan Cho; Jonathan M Samet; Adam M Leventhal; Kiros Berhane; Rob McConnell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Rola Salman; Soha Talih; Rachel El-Hage; Christina Haddad; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Ahmad El-Hellani; Najat A Saliba; Alan Shihadeh Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Eric K Soule; Andrew D Plunk; Paul T Harrell; Rashelle B Hayes; Kathryn C Edwards Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Laura E Crotty Alexander; Lorraine B Ware; Carolyn S Calfee; Sean J Callahan; Thomas Eissenberg; Carol Farver; Maciej L Goniewicz; Ilona Jaspers; Farrah Kheradmand; Talmadge E King; Nuala J Meyer; Vladimir B Mikheev; Peter G Shields; Alan Shihadeh; Robert Strongin; Robert Tarran Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 21.405