Yeongkwon Son1,2, Daniel P Giovenco3, Cristine Delnevo4,5, Andrey Khlystov2, Vera Samburova2, Qingyu Meng1,4. 1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ. 2. Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV. 3. Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. 4. Center for Tobacco Studies, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ. 5. Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Direct emissions of nicotine and harmful chemicals from electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been intensively studied, but secondhand and thirdhand e-cigarette aerosol (THA) exposures in indoor environments are understudied. AIMS AND METHODS: Indoor CO2, NO2, particulate matter (PM2.5), aldehydes, and airborne nicotine were measured in five vape-shops to assess secondhand exposures. Nicotine and tobacco-specific nitrosamines were measured on vape-shop surfaces and materials (glass, paper, clothing, rubber, and fur ball) placed in the vape-shops (14 days) to study thirdhand exposures. RESULTS: Airborne PM2.5, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and nicotine concentrations during shop opening hours were 21, 3.3, 4.0, and 3.8 times higher than the levels during shop closing hours, respectively. PM2.5 concentrations were correlated with the number of e-cigarette users present in vape-shops (ρ = 0.366-0.761, p < .001). Surface nicotine, 4-(N-methyl-N-nitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridyl)butanal (NNA), and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) were also detected at levels of 223.6 ± 313.2 µg/m2, 4.78 ± 11.8 ng/m2, and 44.8 ± 102.3 ng/m2, respectively. Substantial amounts of nicotine (up to 2073 µg/m2) deposited on the materials placed within the vape-shops, and NNA (up to 474.4 ng/m2) and NNK (up to 184.0 ng/m2) were also formed on these materials. The deposited nicotine concentrations were strongly correlated with the median number of active vapers present in a vape-shop per hour (ρ = 0.894-0.949, p = .04-.051). NNK levels on the material surfaces were significantly associated with surface nicotine levels (ρ=0.645, p = .037). CONCLUSIONS: Indoor vaping leads to secondhand and THA exposures. Thirdhand exposures induced by e-cigarette vaping are comparable or higher than that induced by cigarette smoking. Long-term studies in various microenvironments are needed to improve our understanding of secondhand and THA exposures. IMPLICATIONS: This study adds new convincing evidence that e-cigarette vaping can cause secondhand and THA exposures. Our findings can inform Occupational Safety and Health Administration, state authorities, and other government agencies regarding indoor air policies related to e-cigarette use, particularly in vape-shops. There is an urgent need to ensure that vape-shops maintain suitable ventilation systems and cleaning practices to protect customers, employees, and bystanders. Our study also demonstrates that nicotine can deposit or be adsorbed on baby's clothes and toys, and that tobacco-specific nitrosamines can form and retain on baby's clothes, highlighting children's exposure to environmental e-cigarette aerosol and THA at home is of a particular concern.
INTRODUCTION: Direct emissions of nicotine and harmful chemicals from electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been intensively studied, but secondhand and thirdhand e-cigarette aerosol (THA) exposures in indoor environments are understudied. AIMS AND METHODS: Indoor CO2, NO2, particulate matter (PM2.5), aldehydes, and airborne nicotine were measured in five vape-shops to assess secondhand exposures. Nicotine and tobacco-specific nitrosamines were measured on vape-shop surfaces and materials (glass, paper, clothing, rubber, and fur ball) placed in the vape-shops (14 days) to study thirdhand exposures. RESULTS: Airborne PM2.5, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and nicotine concentrations during shop opening hours were 21, 3.3, 4.0, and 3.8 times higher than the levels during shop closing hours, respectively. PM2.5 concentrations were correlated with the number of e-cigarette users present in vape-shops (ρ = 0.366-0.761, p < .001). Surface nicotine, 4-(N-methyl-N-nitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridyl)butanal (NNA), and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) were also detected at levels of 223.6 ± 313.2 µg/m2, 4.78 ± 11.8 ng/m2, and 44.8 ± 102.3 ng/m2, respectively. Substantial amounts of nicotine (up to 2073 µg/m2) deposited on the materials placed within the vape-shops, and NNA (up to 474.4 ng/m2) and NNK (up to 184.0 ng/m2) were also formed on these materials. The deposited nicotine concentrations were strongly correlated with the median number of active vapers present in a vape-shop per hour (ρ = 0.894-0.949, p = .04-.051). NNK levels on the material surfaces were significantly associated with surface nicotine levels (ρ=0.645, p = .037). CONCLUSIONS: Indoor vaping leads to secondhand and THA exposures. Thirdhand exposures induced by e-cigarette vaping are comparable or higher than that induced by cigarette smoking. Long-term studies in various microenvironments are needed to improve our understanding of secondhand and THA exposures. IMPLICATIONS: This study adds new convincing evidence that e-cigarette vaping can cause secondhand and THA exposures. Our findings can inform Occupational Safety and Health Administration, state authorities, and other government agencies regarding indoor air policies related to e-cigarette use, particularly in vape-shops. There is an urgent need to ensure that vape-shops maintain suitable ventilation systems and cleaning practices to protect customers, employees, and bystanders. Our study also demonstrates that nicotine can deposit or be adsorbed on baby's clothes and toys, and that tobacco-specific nitrosamines can form and retain on baby's clothes, highlighting children's exposure to environmental e-cigarette aerosol and THA at home is of a particular concern.
Authors: Soha Talih; Zainab Balhas; Thomas Eissenberg; Rola Salman; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Ahmad El Hellani; Rima Baalbaki; Najat Saliba; Alan Shihadeh Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Eric K Soule; Sarah F Maloney; Tory R Spindle; Alyssa K Rudy; Marzena M Hiler; Caroline O Cobb Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Addie L Fortmann; Joy M Zakarian; Vanessa E Galaviz; Dale A Chatfield; Eunha Hoh; Melbourne F Hovell; Carl Winston Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: G E Matt; P J E Quintana; M F Hovell; J T Bernert; S Song; N Novianti; T Juarez; J Floro; C Gehrman; M Garcia; S Larson Journal: Tob Control Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Georg E Matt; Penelope J E Quintana; Hugo Destaillats; Lara A Gundel; Mohamad Sleiman; Brett C Singer; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz; Jonathan P Winickoff; Virender Rehan; Prue Talbot; Suzaynn Schick; Jonathan Samet; Yinsheng Wang; Bo Hang; Manuela Martins-Green; James F Pankow; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jianmin Liu; Qiwei Liang; Michael J Oldham; Ali A Rostami; Karl A Wagner; I Gene Gillman; Piyush Patel; Rebecca Savioz; Mohamadi Sarkar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kathleen R Attfield; Marley Zalay; Leonard M Zwack; Eric K Glassford; Ryan F LeBouf; Barbara L Materna Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Kevin T Caron; Wanzhe Zhu; John T Bernert; Lanqing Wang; Benjamin C Blount; Kristin Dortch; Ronald E Hunter; Tia Harmon; J Ricky Akins; James Tsai; David M Homa; James L Pirkle; Connie S Sosnoff Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Dongmei Li; Hangchuan Shi; Zidian Xie; Irfan Rahman; Scott McIntosh; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jonathan P Winickoff; Jeremy E Drehmer; Deborah J Ossip Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 4.018