Literature DB >> 26355975

Cranioplasty of Hemispherical Defects Using High Impact Methylmethacrylic Plate.

N Girish Kumar1, H Rangarajan, Pankaj Shourie.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Decompressive craniectomy is the most common neurosurgical procedure performed in today's scenario, usually posttrauma or a cerebrovascular event. Cranioplasty is the repair of a cranial defect or deformation. In the last decade, there has been an increase in the number of cranioplasties performed because of an increase in the number of decompressive craniectomies. Although the main purpose of cranioplasty is to protect the brain and restore aesthetics, it has been proved beyond doubt that there is also an improvement in function and patient self-esteem.Reconstructing the skull after a decompressive craniectomy is a challenge because of the size and contour of the defect, the projection of the brain outside in many cases, and the attendant risks of infection, hematoma, seizures, and CSF leak. In the last few decades, an enormous array of biomaterials has been used for cranioplasty, but there is no consensus on the best material. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Polymethylmethacrylate has been used for cranioplasty since the World War II and is still the most widely used reconstructive material.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients requiring reconstruction of hemispherical cranial defects were taken up for the study. An impression of the defect was taken over the skin using impression compound first and then silicone impression material. The model was trimmed to size, and an acrylic plate was made from High Impact Acrylic. Under general anesthesia, the acrylic plate was fixed to the margins of the defect using titanium plates and screws. Suction drain was placed and the wound closed with Vicryl Rapid. All patients were followed up for 2 years to note any postoperative complications and change in neurological status. There were 12 male patients and 3 female patients. Age of the patients ranged between 8 and 55 years.
RESULTS: All patients were happy with the aesthetic results. There were no complications in all our patients. A few patients showed dramatic improvement in their neurological status.
CONCLUSION: High Impact Acrylic is an excellent restorative material for reconstructing large sized cranial defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26355975     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation.

Authors:  M V M Anchieta; F A Salles; B D Cassaro; M M Quaresma; B F O Santos
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Labial repositioning using polymethylmethracylate (PMMA)-based cement for esthetic smile rehabilitation-A case report.

Authors:  Toni Arcuri; Maykson Feitosa Pereira da Costa; Iury Machado Ribeiro; Byron Daia Barreto; João Paulo Lyra eSilva
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-17

3.  Labial Repositioning Using Print Manufactured Polymethylmethacrylate- (PMMA-) Based Cement for Gummy Smile.

Authors:  Patricia Freitas de Andrade; Jonathan Meza-Mauricio; Ricardo Kern; Marcelo Faveri
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-12-21

4.  Clinical Application of Three-Dimensional Printing of Polycaprolactone/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Implants for Cranial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hojin Park; Jong Woo Choi; Woo Shik Jeong
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Craniofacial Reconstruction by a Cost-Efficient Template-Based Process Using 3D Printing.

Authors:  Bilal Msallem; Fabian Beiglboeck; Philipp Honigmann; Claude Jaquiéry; Florian Thieringer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-11-17

6.  Feasibility of customizing titanium implant with three-dimensional CT imaging of low dose in skull.

Authors:  Min-Xia Yang; Bing Chen; Ya-Ping Zhang; Zhen-Hua Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.