Literature DB >> 27166670

Lethal Prostate Cancer in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.

Jonathan Shoag1, Sameer Mittal2, Joshua A Halpern2, Douglas Scherr2, Jim C Hu2, Christopher E Barbieri3.   

Abstract

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial randomized men to usual care or annual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for 6 yr and digital rectal examination for 4 yr. This trial found no difference between the intervention and usual care arms of the study in the primary end point of prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality. The PLCO trial results have had a major impact on health policy and the rate of PSA screening in the United States. We analyzed the 13-yr screening and outcomes data from the 151 participants who died of PCa in the screening arm of the trial to better understand how randomization to screening failed to prevent PCa death in these men. We found that of these men, 81 (53.6%) either were never screened as part of the trial or had an initial positive screen. Only 17 (11.3%) of those who died reached year 6 of the trial with a PSA <4.0 ng/ml. The men who died in the screening arm were also older at study entry than the average PLCO participant (66 vs 62 yr; p < 0.001). Our analysis should inform the interpretation of the PLCO trial and provide insight into future trial design.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; PLCO trial; PSA; Prostate cancer; Prostate specific antigen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27166670      PMCID: PMC4909529          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  11 in total

1.  Death review process in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  A B Miller; S Yurgalevitch; J L Weissfeld
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

2.  Comment on the US Preventive Services Task Force's draft recommendation on screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maciej Kwiatkowski; Laurence Klotz; Jonas Hugosson; Franz Recker
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  ERSPC and PLCO prostate cancer screening studies: what are the differences?

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  National Prostate Cancer Screening Rates After the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Discouraging Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening.

Authors:  Michael W Drazer; Dezheng Huo; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Lawrence R Ragard; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Ann W Hsing; Grant Izmirlian; Paul F Pinsky; Barnett S Kramer; Anthony B Miller; John K Gohagan; Philip C Prorok
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; T L Ratliff; J W Basler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Prostate cancer specific survival in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Amanda Black; Howard L Parnes; Robert Grubb; E David Crawford; Anthony Miller; Douglas Reding; Gerald Andriole
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Clinical features of patients who present with metastatic prostate carcinoma and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels < 10 ng/mL: the "PSA negative" patients.

Authors:  Alison J Birtle; Alex Freeman; John R W Masters; Heather A Payne; Stephen J Harland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Results from 22 years of Followup in the Göteborg Randomized Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Maria Frånlund; Marianne Månsson; Rebecka Arnsrud Godtman; Gunnar Aus; Erik Holmberg; Karin Stinesen Kollberg; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Hans Lilja; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 7.600

Review 2.  Prostate cancer screening-when to start and how to screen?

Authors:  Kimia Kohestani; Marina Chilov; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02

3.  Correlation between Prostatitis, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Yi Wang; Zhiqiang Qin; Xian Gao; Qianwei Xing; Ran Li; Wei Wang; Ninghong Song; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.