Literature DB >> 27165171

Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts.

Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld1,2, Anna Schubö3.   

Abstract

Targets are found more easily in a visual search task when their feature is repeatedly presented, an effect known as intertrial priming. Recent findings suggest that priming of distractors can also improve search performance by facilitated suppression of repeated distractor features. The efficacy of intertrial priming for targets can be potentiated by the expectancy of a specific target feature; systematic repetition shows larger intertrial priming than random repetition. For distractors, the underlying mechanism is less clear. We used the systematic lateralization approach to disentangle target- and distractor-related processing with subcomponents of the N2pc. We found no modulation of the NT component, which reflects prioritization of target processing. The ND component, which reflects attentional capture by irrelevant stimuli, however, showed intertrial priming: ND monotonically decreased with repetition of a distractor color, but only if a specific distractor feature was expected, and if the context induced a search that was vulnerable to attentional capture. These observations suggest that distractor priming only improves visual search if volitional control is relatively high. The results also suggest that intertrial priming for distractors is due to decreased attentional capture by repeatedly presented distractors, whereas target processing remains unaffected.

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Intertrial priming; N2pc; ND; NT; PD; Priming of pop-out; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27165171     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1115-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

1.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09

Review 2.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Selection History Modulates Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Bo-Cheng Kuo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-07

5.  The necessity to choose causes the effects of reward on saccade preparation.

Authors:  Christian Wolf; Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Visual search under physical effort is faster but more vulnerable to distractor interference.

Authors:  Hyung-Bum Park; Shinhae Ahn; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-03-12

7.  Differing Time Courses of Reward-Related Attentional Processing: An EEG Source-Space Analysis.

Authors:  Denise E L Lockhofen; Nils Hübner; Fatma Hemdan; Gebhard Sammer; Dion Henare; Anna Schubö; Christoph Mulert
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.

Authors:  Changrun Huang; Ana Vilotijević; Jan Theeuwes; Mieke Donk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.