Literature DB >> 27161214

Understanding the Different Effects of Inhaler Design on the Aerosol Performance of Drug-Only and Carrier-Based DPI Formulations. Part 1: Grid Structure.

Cassandra Ming Shan Leung1, Zhenbo Tong2, Qi Tony Zhou3, John Gar Yan Chan1,4, Patricia Tang1, Siping Sun1, Runyu Yang5, Hak-Kim Chan6.   

Abstract

The design of a dry powder inhaler device has significant influence on aerosol performance; however, such influence may be different between the drug-only and carrier-based formulations. The present study aims to examine the potential difference on the dispersion between these distinct types of formulations, using Aerolizer(®) as a model inhaler with the original or modified (cross-grid) designs. A coupled CFD-discrete element method analysis was employed to determine the flow characteristics and particle impaction. Micronized salbutamol sulphate as a drug-only formulation and three lactose carrier-based formulations with various drug-to-carrier weight ratios 1:5, 1:10 and 1:100 were used. The in vitro aerosolization performance was assessed by a next-generation impactor operating at 100 L/min. Using the original device, FPFloaded was reduced from 47.5 ± 3.8% for the drug-only formulation to 31.8 ± 0.7%, 32.1 ± 0.7% and 12.9 ± 1.0% for the 1:5, 1:10 and 1:100 formulations, respectively. With the cross-grid design, powder-mouthpiece impaction was increased, which caused not only powder deagglomeration but also significant drug retention (doubling or more) in the mouthpiece, and the net result is a significant decrease in FPFloaded to 36.8 ± 1.2%, 20.9 ± 2.6% and 21.9 ± 1.5% for the drug-only, 1:5 and 1:10 formulations, respectively. In contrast, the FPFloaded of the 1:100 formulation remained the same at 12.1 ± 1.3%, indicating the increased mouthpiece drug retention was compensated by increased drug detachment from carriers caused by increased powder-mouthpiece impaction. In conclusion, this study has elucidated different effects and the mechanism on the aerosolization of varied dry powder inhaler formulations due to the grid design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carrier system; computational fluid dynamics; device design; dry powder inhaler; inhaler grid structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27161214     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-016-9922-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  17 in total

1.  Effect of design on the performance of a dry powder inhaler using computational fluid dynamics. Part 1: Grid structure and mouthpiece length.

Authors:  Matthew S Coates; David F Fletcher; Hak-Kim Chan; Judy A Raper
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Dry powder inhaler device influence on carrier particle performance.

Authors:  Martin J Donovan; Sin Hyen Kim; Venkatramanan Raman; Hugh D Smyth
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Effect of device design on the in vitro performance and comparability for capsule-based dry powder inhalers.

Authors:  Jagdeep Shur; Sau Lee; Wallace Adams; Robert Lionberger; James Tibbatts; Robert Price
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  Numerical Modelling of Agglomeration and Deagglomeration in Dry Powder Inhalers: A Review.

Authors:  Jiecheng Yang; Chuan-Yu Wu; Michael Adams
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 5.  Powder Production and Particle Engineering for Dry Powder Inhaler Formulations.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Lin; Jennifer Wong; Li Qu; Hak-Kim Chan; Qi Tony Zhou
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 6.  Discrete Modelling of Powder Dispersion in Dry Powder Inhalers - A Brief Review.

Authors:  Zhenbo Tong; Aibing Yu; Hak-Kim Chan; Runyu Yang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 7.  Drug-lactose binding aspects in adhesive mixtures: controlling performance in dry powder inhaler formulations by altering lactose carrier surfaces.

Authors:  Qi Tony Zhou; David A V Morton
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Effect of device design on the aerosolization of a carrier-based dry powder inhaler--a case study on Aerolizer(®) Foradile (®).

Authors:  Qi Tony Zhou; Zhenbo Tong; Patricia Tang; Mauro Citterio; Runyu Yang; Hak-Kim Chan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 9.  Emerging inhalation aerosol devices and strategies: where are we headed?

Authors:  Qi Tony Zhou; Patricia Tang; Sharon Shui Yee Leung; John Gar Yan Chan; Hak-Kim Chan
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 10.  In vivo-in vitro correlations: predicting pulmonary drug deposition from pharmaceutical aerosols.

Authors:  Peter R Byron; Michael Hindle; Carlos F Lange; P Worth Longest; Donald McRobbie; Michael J Oldham; Bo Olsson; Charles G Thiel; Herbert Wachtel; Warren H Finlay
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.849

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  In Silico Methods for Development of Generic Drug-Device Combination Orally Inhaled Drug Products.

Authors:  Ross L Walenga; Andrew H Babiskin; Liang Zhao
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-21

Review 2.  Flow and Particle Modelling of Dry Powder Inhalers: Methodologies, Recent Development and Emerging Applications.

Authors:  Zhanying Zheng; Sharon Shui Yee Leung; Raghvendra Gupta
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.321

3.  A real-time and modular approach for quick detection and mechanism exploration of DPIs with different carrier particle sizes.

Authors:  Yingtong Cui; Ying Huang; Xuejuan Zhang; Xiangyun Lu; Jun Xue; Guanlin Wang; Ping Hu; Xiao Yue; Ziyu Zhao; Xin Pan; Chuanbin Wu
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 11.413

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.