| Literature DB >> 27158896 |
Nieves Embade1, Zoe Mariño2,3, Tammo Diercks1, Ainara Cano4, Sabela Lens2,3, Diana Cabrera1, Miquel Navasa2,3, Juan M Falcón-Pérez1,3,5, Joan Caballería2,3, Azucena Castro4, Jaume Bosch2,3, José M Mato1,3, Oscar Millet1.
Abstract
Several etiologies result in chronic liver diseases including chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV). Despite its high incidence and the severe economic and medical consequences, liver disease is still commonly overlooked due to the lack of efficient non-invasive diagnostic methods. While several techniques have been tested for the detection of fibrosis, the available biomarkers still present severe limitations that preclude their use in clinical diagnostics. Liver diseases have also been the subject of metabolomic analysis. Here, we demonstrate the suitability of 1H NMR spectroscopy for characterizing the metabolism of liver fibrosis induced by HCV. Serum samples from HCV patients without fibrosis or with liver cirrhosis were analyzed by NMR spectroscopy and the results were submitted to multivariate and univariate statistical analysis. PLS-DA test was able to discriminate between advanced fibrotic and non-fibrotic patients and several metabolites were found to be up or downregulated in patients with cirrhosis. The suitability of the most significantly regulated metabolites was validated by ROC analysis. Our study reveals that choline, acetoacetate and low-density lipoproteins are the most informative biomarkers for predicting cirrhosis in HCV patients. Our results demonstrate that statistical analysis of 1H-NMR spectra is able to distinguish between fibrotic and non-fibrotic patients suffering from HCV, representing a novel diagnostic application for NMR spectroscopy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27158896 PMCID: PMC4861296 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical Metadata of the Studied Patient Population.
| METAVIR stage | ||
|---|---|---|
| Metadata | F0 (n = 26) | F4 (n = 26) |
| Age (years) | 40.63± 16.35 | 58.15± 9.03 |
| Male gender | 46.15 | 61.54 |
| Genotype VCH | ||
| 1a | 7.69 | 16.00 |
| 1b | 61.54 | 64.00 |
| 2 | 3.85 | 4.00 |
| 3 | 11.54 | 8.00 |
| 4 | 15.38 | 8.00 |
| AST (IU/l) | 39.31± 21.67 | 120.62± 67.17 |
| ALT (IU/l) | 65.04± 32.98 | 140.65± 101.46 |
| GGT (IU/l) | 32.65± 26.77 | 66.42± 35.29 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 159.00± 80.12 | 247.67± 115.48 |
| Bilirubin (mg/dl) | 0.61± 0.30 | 1.07± 0.51 |
| VCHCV (log) | 5.82± 0.87 | 6.08± 0.59 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 82.31± 23.21 | 85.61± 40.35 |
| Platelet (G/L) | 173.08± 99.26 | 117.65± 80.97 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 143.81± 77.95 | 122.73± 74.94 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 24.08± 9.95 | 25.14± 7.19 |
Values are expressed as the average ± standard deviation.
in percent of patients.
Viral load of Hepatitis C virus.
Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, γ-glutamyl transferase; BMI, body mass index.
Fig 1PLS-DA analysis for G0 versus G4 serum samples.
(A) Three-dimensional PLS-DA score plot. Red triangles: G0 samples (fibrosis stage F0). Green crosses: G4 samples (fibrosis stage F4). (B) Two-dimensional PLS-DA score plot. Red circles: G0 samples. Green circles: G4 samples. (C) PLS-DA classification using different numbers of components. The red asterisk indicates the best classifier. The inset table summarizes Q2, R2 and accuracy of the best model. Comps means number of components. (D) Permutation test statistics for 1000 permutations with observed statistic at p < 0.01.
Fig 2Significant features (binned signals) discriminating between G0 and G4 serum samples.
(A) Important features identified by PLS-DA and VIP scores. The colored boxes on the right indicate relative bin integrals for G0 and G4 samples. Variable Importance in Projection is a weighted sum of squares of the PLS loadings taking into account the amount of explained Y-variation in each dimension. (B) Heatmap of unsupervised hierarchical clustering (distance measure using Pearson and clustering algorithm using Ward). The heatmap was constructed from the most significantly differing bins (features), as identified by PLS-DA and VIP scores. Only the top 25 features are shown. Each colored cell on the map corresponds to a relative concentration value, with samples in rows (S2 Table indicates the original name of every sample) and features/compounds in columns. Red and blue colors denote increased and decreased bin integrals, respectively.
Fig 3Representative T2-filtered 1H- NMR spectrum of human serum sample measured at 300 K, 600 MHz.
(A) Full spectrum (0–10 ppm), (B) 35× zoom on the aromatic signal region (5.5–8.5 ppm). Signal assignments were derived by consulting the NMR metabolic profiling database (HMDB), literature references, or from NMR experiments on the pure compounds added to an average serum sample. Spectra were referenced internally against the TSP signal (δ = 0.00 ppm). Assignment numbers correspond to identified metabolites as follows: 1, citric acid; 2, cysteine; 3, lactic acid; 4, glutamine; 5, glutamate; 6, isoleucine; 7, valine; 8, leucine; 9, alanine; 10, 3-hydroxybutyrate; 11, lysine; 12, arginine; 13, Nac1 (N-acetyl of glycoproteins); 14, Nac2; 15, choline; 16, creatine; 17, creatinine, 18, glycerol; 19, TMAO (trimethylamine N-oxide); 20, isobutyric acid; 21, VLDL1 (very low density lipoproteins); 22, acetoacetate; 23, VLDL2; 24, LDL2 (low density lipoproteins); 25, Lipid; 26, GPC (glycerophosphocholine); 27, glucose β-H2; 28, glucose/sugars; 29, α-glucose; 30, lipids; 31, urea; 32, fumaric acid; 33, tyrosine; 34, histidine; 35, phenylalanine; 36, hippuric acid; 37, formic acid.
Most important metabolites obtained from the PLS-VIP, Wilcoxon Mann Whitney test and ROC analysis.
| Metabolite | Observed δ1H | Assignment | AUROC | p.value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LDL1 ↓ | 0.84 (bs) | CH3(CH2)n | 0.83728 | 2.95E-06 |
| Choline ↓ | 3.22 (s) | N-(CH3)3 | 0.8284 | 9.74E-06 |
| Acetoacetate ↓ | 2.30 (s) | CH3 | 0.80769 | 0.0012499 |
| NAC1 ↓ | 2.07 (bs) | NHCOCH3 | 0.7929 | 0.00028694 |
| Isoleucine +Leucine ↓ | 0.95 (t) 0.98 (t) | γ-CH3, δ-CH3 | 0.77071 | 0.0024097 |
| Creatinine + Creatine ↓ | 3.05 (s), 3.06 (s) | CH3 CH3 | 0.76479 | 0.0073431 |
| LDL ↓ | 1.23 (m) | 0.76036 | 0.00087216 | |
| Glutamate ↓ | 2.37 (m) | γ-CH2 | 0.75592 | 0.0010727 |
| Glutamine ↓ | 2.46 (m) | γ-CH2 | 0.7500 | 0.0012631 |
| VLDL1 ↑ | 0.89 (bs) | CH3(CH2)nC = | 0.74852 | 0.0014119 |
| HDL ↓ | 0.80 (bs) | CH3(CH2)n | 0.74556 | 0.0043228 |
| Asparagine ↓ | 2.90 (dd) | 1/2 β-CH2 | 0.74408 | 0.001473 |
| Valine ↓ | 3.62 (d) | α-CH | 0.7426 | 0.012212 |
| Lipid (albumin lysyl) ↓ | 3.01 (bs) | ε-CH2 | 0.74112 | 0.0022208 |
| VLDL2 ↑ | 1.25 (bs) | (CH2)n | 0.73964 | 0.01002 |
| Unknown ↓ | 1.09 | 0.73669 | 0.0018143 | |
| NAC2 ↓ | 2.10 (bs) | NHCOCH3 | 0.73077 | 0.0046624 |
| Citrate ↑ | 2.55 (d) | 1/2 γ-CH2 | 0.72929 | 0.0049306 |
| Lysine ↓ | 1.92(m) | β-CH2 | 0.72781 | 0.011943 |
| Creatine ↓ | 3.95 (s) | CH2 | 0.71893 | 0.0025988 |
| Lipid ↑ | 1.28 (m) | (CH2)nCO | 0.71598 | 0.0038995 |
| Unknown ↑ | 6.93 | 0.71598 | 0.0043897 | |
| Valine ↓ | 1.01 (d) | γ-CH3 | 0.7145 | 0.011009 |
| Lysine + Arginine ↓ | 1.9 (m) | β-CH2 β-CH2 | 0.7145 | 0.016763 |
| Cysteine ↓ | 3.04 (m) | CH-SH | 0.7145 | 0.0087713 |
| Asparagine ↓ | 2.93 (dd) | 1/2 β-CH2 | 0.70858 | 0.011321 |
| Arginine + Lysine ↓ | 1.9 (m) | β-CH2 β-CH2 | 0.70562 | 0.018961 |
| Glutamine ↓ | 2.45 (m) | γ-CH2 | 0.70562 | 0.0059592 |
| Asparagine ↓ | 2.91 (dd) | 1/2 β-CH2 | 0.70562 | 0.007396 |
| Glycerol ↓ | 3.67 (dd) | 1/2 CH2 | 0.70562 | 0.003731 |
| Arginine ↓ | 1.69 (m) | γ-CH2 | 0.70414 | 0.041512 |
| 3-hydroxybutyrate ↓ | 1.16 (d) | γ-CH3 | 0.64793 | 0.034028 |
| Glucose/Sugars ↑ | 3.5 (dd) | C2H | 0.66124 | 0.023402 |
| Phenylalanine ↑ | 3.26 (dd) | 1/2 β-CH2 | 0.64645 | 0.03929 |
| Histidine ↓ | 7.04 (s) | C4H-ring | 0.64349 | 0.040614 |
A p-value < 0.05 from t-test between G0 and G4 serum samples was considered to be significant. AUROC: Area under the curve obtained from ROC analysis for every metabolite. Only metabolites with AUROC > 0.7 are shown, except for the last four metabolites with an AUROC > 0.6. First column: Arrows ↓ and ↑ indicate decreased or increased metabolite levels in G4 vs. G0 serum samples. Second column: Chemical shift for every metabolite, signal structure: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; dd, doublet of doublets; bs, broad signal; m, multiplet; NAC, N-acetyl signals from glycoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins; VLDL, very low density lipoproteins; HDL, high density lipoproteins.
Fig 4Boxplot of relative concentrations for some significantly altered metabolites (p < 0.05) in serum of G4 (green) and G0 (red) patients.
Y axes are represented as relative units. Data were normalized to the total spectral area. Due to this normalization process we obtained negative scale in the Y-axis in some of the bins (Metaboanalyst program analysis). The bar plots show the normalized values (mean +/- one standard deviation). The boxes range from the 25% and the 75% percentiles; the 5% and 95% percentiles are indicated as error bars; single data points are indicated by circles. Medians are indicated by horizontal lines within each box.
Fig 5Individual receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
The colored curves represent the bins at 0.83 ppm (LDL1), 3.20 ppm (choline) and 2.30 ppm (acetoacetate). The black curve represents our multivariable predictive model described by the linear combination α*2.30 + β*0.83 + γ*3.20 that reaches a cut-off value of -0.316, specificity of 80%, sensitivity of 70%, AUROC score of 0.922, and confidence interval of 95% (0.85 to 0.97).