Literature DB >> 27158633

Automated quality assessment in three-dimensional breast ultrasound images.

Julia Schwaab1, Yago Diez2, Arnau Oliver3, Robert Martí3, Jan van Zelst4, Albert Gubern-Mérida4, Ahmed Bensouda Mourri5, Johannes Gregori1, Matthias Günther6.   

Abstract

Automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound (ABUS) is a valuable adjunct to x-ray mammography for breast cancer screening of women with dense breasts. High image quality is essential for proper diagnostics and computer-aided detection. We propose an automated image quality assessment system for ABUS images that detects artifacts at the time of acquisition. Therefore, we study three aspects that can corrupt ABUS images: the nipple position relative to the rest of the breast, the shadow caused by the nipple, and the shape of the breast contour on the image. Image processing and machine learning algorithms are combined to detect these artifacts based on 368 clinical ABUS images that have been rated manually by two experienced clinicians. At a specificity of 0.99, 55% of the images that were rated as low quality are detected by the proposed algorithms. The areas under the ROC curves of the single classifiers are 0.99 for the nipple position, 0.84 for the nipple shadow, and 0.89 for the breast contour shape. The proposed algorithms work fast and reliably, which makes them adequate for online evaluation of image quality during acquisition. The presented concept may be extended to further image modalities and quality aspects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated breast ultrasound imaging; image processing; image quality; machine learning

Year:  2016        PMID: 27158633      PMCID: PMC4841937          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.2.027002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  15 in total

1.  A computerised quality control testing system for B-mode ultrasound.

Authors:  N M Gibson; N J Dudley; K Griffith
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Multiplanar Reconstructions of 3D Automated Breast Ultrasound Improve Lesion Differentiation by Radiologists.

Authors:  Jan C M Van Zelst; Bram Platel; Nico Karssemeijer; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kagan Arleo; Marwa Saleh; Dana Ionescu; Michele Drotman; Robert J Min; Keith Hentel
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 1.605

4.  A hybrid method towards automated nipple detection in 3D breast ultrasound images.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Tobias Böhler; Fabian Zöhrer; Joachim Georgii; Claudia Rauh; Peter A Fasching; Barbara Brehm; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael Uder; Horst K Hahn
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

5.  Learning the manifold of quality ultrasound acquisition.

Authors:  Noha El-Zehiry; Michelle Yan; Sara Good; Tong Fang; S Kevin Zhou; Leo Grady
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

6.  Prospective and retrospective motion correction in diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  Tobias Kober; Rolf Gruetter; Gunnar Krueger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Laura C Collins; Stuart J Schnitt; Bernard Rosner; Celine Vachon; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  M T Mandelson; N Oestreicher; P L Porter; D White; C A Finder; S H Taplin; E White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Breast cancer detection: radiologists' performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Kevin M Kelly; Judy Dean; Sung-Jae Lee; W Scott Comulada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bayesian framework inspired no-reference region-of-interest quality measure for brain MRI images.

Authors:  Michael Osadebey; Marius Pedersen; Douglas Arnold; Katrina Wendel-Mitoraj
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-13

2.  Image quality and artifacts in automated breast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sung Hun Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2018-07-14

3.  False-negative results on computer-aided detection software in preoperative automated breast ultrasonography of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Youngjune Kim; Jiwon Rim; Sun Mi Kim; Bo La Yun; So Yeon Park; Hye Shin Ahn; Bohyoung Kim; Mijung Jang
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-03-24

4.  Robotic Ultrasound Scanning With Real-Time Image-Based Force Adjustment: Quick Response for Enabling Physical Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Mojtaba Akbari; Jay Carriere; Tyler Meyer; Ron Sloboda; Siraj Husain; Nawaid Usmani; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-03-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.