Literature DB >> 21795664

Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics.

Lusine Yaghjyan1, Graham A Colditz, Laura C Collins, Stuart J Schnitt, Bernard Rosner, Celine Vachon, Rulla M Tamimi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies that investigated the associations between breast density and subsequent breast cancer according to tumor characteristics have produced inconclusive findings. We aimed to determine whether the associations between breast density and subsequent breast cancer varied by tumor characteristics.
METHODS: We included 1042 postmenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer between June 1, 1989, and June 30, 2004, and 1794 matched control subjects from the Nurses' Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of 121 701 registered female nurses across the United States. Breast density was estimated from digitized images using computerized techniques. Information on breast cancer risk factors was obtained prospectively from biennial questionnaires before the date of cancer diagnosis for case subjects and matched control subjects. Polychotomous logistic regression was used to assess associations of breast density with tumor subtypes based on invasiveness, histology, size, grade, receptor status, and involvement of lymph nodes. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided.
RESULTS: The risk of breast cancer increased progressively with increase in percent breast density (P(trend) < .001). Women with higher breast density (≥50%) showed a 3.39-fold (odds ratio = 3.39, 95% confidence interval = 2.46 to 4.68) increased risk of breast cancer compared with women with lower breast density (<10%). The associations between breast density and breast cancer risk were stronger for in situ compared with invasive tumors (P(heterogeneity) < .01), high-grade compared with low-grade tumors (P(heterogeneity) = .02), larger (>2 cm) compared with smaller (≤2 cm) tumors (P(heterogeneity) < .01), and estrogen receptor-negative compared with estrogen receptor-positive tumors (P(heterogeneity) = .04). There were no differences in associations by tumor histology, involvement of lymph nodes, and progesterone receptor and HER2 status (P(heterogeneity) > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that higher mammographic density is associated with more aggressive tumor characteristics and also with in situ tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21795664      PMCID: PMC3149043          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  48 in total

1.  Risk factors for ductal, lobular, and mixed ductal-lobular breast cancer in a screening population.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Christopher I Li; Karla Kerlikowske; William E Barlow; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Andrea J Cook; Diana S M Buist; Steve R Cummings; Celine Vachon; Pamela Vacek; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Does breast density show difference in patients with estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer measured on MRI?

Authors:  J-H Chen; F-T Hsu; H-N Shih; C-C Hsu; D Chang; K Nie; O Nalcioglu; M-Y Su
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.

Authors:  Elad Ziv; Jeffrey Tice; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; John Shepherd; Steven Cummings; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Linn A Abraham; Diana L Miglioretti; Edward A Sickles; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Berta M Geller; Hyman B Muss; Les Irwig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Mammographic density, estrogen receptor status and other breast cancer tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Jane Ding; Ruth Warren; Anne Girling; Deborah Thompson; Douglas Easton
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images.

Authors:  J W Byng; N F Boyd; L Little; G Lockwood; E Fishell; R A Jong; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Tissue estradiol is selectively elevated in receptor positive breast cancers while tumour estrone is reduced independent of receptor status.

Authors:  P E Lønning; H Helle; N K Duong; D Ekse; T Aas; J Geisler
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.292

9.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  N F Boyd; J W Byng; R A Jong; E K Fishell; L E Little; A B Miller; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status.

Authors:  C Byrne; C Schairer; J Wolfe; N Parekh; M Salane; L A Brinton; R Hoover; R Haile
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  83 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  CD36 repression activates a multicellular stromal program shared by high mammographic density and tumor tissues.

Authors:  Rosa Anna DeFilippis; Hang Chang; Nancy Dumont; Joseph T Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Gerald V Fontenay; Hal K Berman; Mona L Gauthier; Jianxin Zhao; Donglei Hu; James J Marx; Judy A Tjoe; Elad Ziv; Maria Febbraio; Karla Kerlikowske; Bahram Parvin; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 39.397

3.  Associations of aspirin and other anti-inflammatory medications with mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Akemi Wijayabahu; A Heather Eliassen; Graham Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  [New prognostic and predictive markers for breast cancer].

Authors:  D L Wachter
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 5.  Perinatal environmental exposures affect mammary development, function, and cancer risk in adulthood.

Authors:  Suzanne E Fenton; Casey Reed; Retha R Newbold
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 13.820

6.  Breast density influences tumor subtypes and tumor aggressiveness.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Amanda I Phipps
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Paula B Gordon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Mammographic Density and Prediction of Nodal Status in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  C C Hack; L Häberle; K Geisler; R Schulz-Wendtland; A Hartmann; P A Fasching; M Uder; D L Wachter; S M Jud; C R Loehberg; M P Lux; C Rauh; M W Beckmann; K Heusinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Risk factors for inflammatory breast cancer and other invasive breast cancers.

Authors:  Catherine Schairer; Yan Li; Peter Frawley; Barry I Graubard; Robert D Wellman; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy L Onega; William F Anderson; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.