Literature DB >> 27158456

The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.

Jonathan P Tennant1, François Waldner2, Damien C Jacques2, Paola Masuzzo3, Lauren B Collister4, Chris H J Hartgerink5.   

Abstract

Ongoing debates surrounding Open Access to the scholarly literature are multifaceted and complicated by disparate and often polarised viewpoints from engaged stakeholders. At the current stage, Open Access has become such a global issue that it is critical for all involved in scholarly publishing, including policymakers, publishers, research funders, governments, learned societies, librarians, and academic communities, to be well-informed on the history, benefits, and pitfalls of Open Access. In spite of this, there is a general lack of consensus regarding the potential pros and cons of Open Access at multiple levels. This review aims to be a resource for current knowledge on the impacts of Open Access by synthesizing important research in three major areas: academic, economic and societal. While there is clearly much scope for additional research, several key trends are identified, including a broad citation advantage for researchers who publish openly, as well as additional benefits to the non-academic dissemination of their work. The economic impact of Open Access is less well-understood, although it is clear that access to the research literature is key for innovative enterprises, and a range of governmental and non-governmental services. Furthermore, Open Access has the potential to save both publishers and research funders considerable amounts of financial resources, and can provide some economic benefits to traditionally subscription-based journals. The societal impact of Open Access is strong, in particular for advancing citizen science initiatives, and leveling the playing field for researchers in developing countries. Open Access supersedes all potential alternative modes of access to the scholarly literature through enabling unrestricted re-use, and long-term stability independent of financial constraints of traditional publishers that impede knowledge sharing. However, Open Access has the potential to become unsustainable for research communities if high-cost options are allowed to continue to prevail in a widely unregulated scholarly publishing market. Open Access remains only one of the multiple challenges that the scholarly publishing system is currently facing. Yet, it provides one foundation for increasing engagement with researchers regarding ethical standards of publishing and the broader implications of 'Open Research'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Altmetrics; Copyright; Incentive System; Open Access; Open Citation Advantage; Open Science, Text and Data Mining; Publishing

Year:  2016        PMID: 27158456      PMCID: PMC4837983          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


  67 in total

1.  Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact.

Authors:  S Lawrence
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.

Authors:  S van Rooyen; F Godlee; S Evans; N Black; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02

3.  Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

4.  Altmetrics: Value all research products.

Authors:  Heather Piwowar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Penetrating the omerta of predatory publishing: the romanian connection.

Authors:  Dragan Djuric
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results.

Authors:  Jelte M Wicherts; Marjan Bakker; Dylan Molenaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation.

Authors:  Ulrich Pöschl
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Open access: the changing face of scientific publishing.

Authors:  Pranab Chatterjee; Tamoghna Biswas; Vishala Mishra
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2013-04

9.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

View more
  55 in total

1.  Open collaborative writing with Manubot.

Authors:  Daniel S Himmelstein; Vincent Rubinetti; David R Slochower; Dongbo Hu; Venkat S Malladi; Casey S Greene; Anthony Gitter
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Democratizing Access to Community-Based Survey Findings Through Dynamic Data Visualizations.

Authors:  Kiffer G Card; Justin Sorge; Ben Klassen; Rob Higgins; Len Tooley; Aidan Ablona; Jody Jollimore; Nathan J Lachowsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-09-09

3.  Authorship representation in global emergency medicine: a bibliometric analysis from 2016 to 2020.

Authors:  Stephanie Chow Garbern; Gimbo Hyuha; Catalina González Marqués; Noor Baig; Jennifer L Chan; Sanjukta Dutta; Masuma A Gulamhussein; Gloria Paulina López Terán; Hussein Karim Manji; Winnie K Mdundo; Rachel T Moresky; Raya Yusuph Mussa; Erin E Noste; Mulinda Nyirenda; Maxwell Osei-Ampofo; Sindhya Rajeev; Hendry R Sawe; Alphonce Nsabi Simbila; M C Kaushila Thilakasiri; Nikkole Turgeon; Benjamin W Wachira; Rebecca S Yang; Amne Yussuf; Raina Zhang; Alishia Zyer; Chris A Rees
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-06

Review 4.  Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence?

Authors:  Stefan Reichmann; Bernhard Wieser
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 5.  Building Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Expertise in Ghana Through Training and Knowledge Dissemination: a Review of the Initial Collaboration Stages, Opportunities, and Challenges.

Authors:  Nakita Natala; Ruth Owusu-Antwi; Gordon Donnir; Kwabena Kusi-Mensah; Heidi Burns; Sarah Mohiuddin; Thomas Fluent; Michelle Riba; Gregory Dalack
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.

Authors:  Sean Grant; Kathleen E Wendt; Bonnie J Leadbeater; Lauren H Supplee; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Frances Gardner; Catherine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-02-17

7.  Global Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Research Priorities and Learning Challenges under Sustainable Development Goal 6.

Authors:  Karen Setty; Alejandro Jiménez; Juliet Willetts; Mats Leifels; Jamie Bartram
Journal:  Dev Policy Rev       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  Factors that influence data sharing through data sharing platforms: A qualitative study on the views and experiences of cohort holders and platform developers.

Authors:  Thijs Devriendt; Pascal Borry; Mahsa Shabani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Corrigendum: Applied Research in Low-Income Countries: Why and How?

Authors:  Krishna Prasad Acharya; Santosh Pathak
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2021-06-01

10.  Assessing Markers of Reproducibility and Transparency in Smoking Behaviour Change Intervention Evaluations.

Authors:  Emma Norris; Yiwei He; Rachel Loh; Robert West; Susan Michie
Journal:  J Smok Cessat       Date:  2021-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.