Literature DB >> 17227490

Validity of prostate-specific antigen as a tumour marker in men with prostate cancer managed by watchful-waiting: correlation with findings at serial endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging.

Fergus V Coakley1, Irene Chen, Aliya Qayyum, Antonio C Westphalen, Peter R Carroll, Hedvig Hricak, Mei-Hsiu Chen, John Kurhanewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a tumour marker in men with clinically localized prostate cancer who have selected watchful waiting, by determining if serial PSA level measurements are correlated with findings of malignancy or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) at serial endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 69 men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer being managed by watchful waiting, who underwent serial endorectal MRI/MRSI and who had contemporaneous serial PSA measurements. The mean (range) follow-up was 392 (294-571) days. A panel of three experienced readers reviewed the initial and follow-up MRI/MRSI studies, and classified findings of prostate cancer as stable or progressive. Another reader assessed BPH by calculating total gland and central gland volumes on all studies.
RESULTS: At the follow-up MRI/MRSI, 51, 17 and one patient had stable, progressive, or unevaluable prostate cancer, respectively. The mean PSA velocity was significantly greater in patients with radiologically progressive disease (1.42 vs 0.42 ng/mL/year, P = 0.04). A PSA velocity of >0.75 ng/mL/year identified those with radiologically progressive disease with a true-positive fraction of 0.71 and a false-positive fraction of 0.39. PSA levels were not correlated with changes in total or central gland volumes (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In men with clinically localized prostate cancer who select watchful waiting, serial PSA levels are correlated with findings of malignancy but not BPH at serial endorectal MRI/MRSI, suggesting that PSA is a useful longitudinal tumour marker in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17227490     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06515.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

1.  Prostate cancer managed with active surveillance: role of anatomic MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Vincent Fradet; John Kurhanewicz; Janet E Cowan; Alexander Karl; Fergus V Coakley; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Validating multiparametric MRI for diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer in patients for active surveillance.

Authors:  Iqbal Sahibzada; Deepak Batura; Giles Hellawell
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Franiel; Bernd Hamm; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance.

Authors:  Larissa J Vos; Michele Janoski; Keith Wachowicz; Atiyah Yahya; Oleksandr Boychak; John Amanie; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew B Parliament; Edith Pituskin; B Gino Fallone; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

Review 5.  A decade in prostate cancer: from NMR to metabolomics.

Authors:  Elita M DeFeo; Chin-Lee Wu; W Scott McDougal; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  DW-MRI of the urogenital tract: applications in oncology.

Authors:  G Petralia; H C Thoeny
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 7.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel Vigneron; Peter Carroll; Fergus Coakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 8.  MR imaging of the prostate in clinical practice.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Amita Shukla-Dave; Ada Muellner; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Local staging of prostate cancer: comparative accuracy of T2-weighted endorectal MR imaging and transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  Adam J Jung; Fergus V Coakley; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz; Janet E Cowan; Antonio C Westphalen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 1.605

10.  Prostate cancer: is inapparent tumor at endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging a favorable prognostic finding in patients who select active surveillance?

Authors:  Alvin R Cabrera; Fergus V Coakley; Antonio C Westphalen; Ying Lu; Shoujun Zhao; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.