PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to predict early distant failure in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using clinical parameters by machine learning algorithms. MATERIALS/ METHODS: The dataset used in this work includes 81 early stage NSCLC patients with at least 6months of follow-up who underwent SBRT between 2006 and 2012 at a single institution. The clinical parameters (n=18) for each patient include demographic parameters, tumor characteristics, treatment fraction schemes, and pretreatment medications. Three predictive models were constructed based on different machine learning algorithms: (1) artificial neural network (ANN), (2) logistic regression (LR) and (3) support vector machine (SVM). Furthermore, to select an optimal clinical parameter set for the model construction, three strategies were adopted: (1) clonal selection algorithm (CSA) based selection strategy; (2) sequential forward selection (SFS) method; and (3) statistical analysis (SA) based strategy. 5-cross-validation is used to validate the performance of each predictive model. The accuracy was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity of the system was also evaluated. RESULTS: The AUCs for ANN, LR and SVM were 0.75, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively. The sensitivity values for ANN, LR and SVM were 71.2%, 72.9% and 83.1%, while the specificity values for ANN, LR and SVM were 59.1%, 63.6% and 63.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, the CSA based strategy outperformed SFS and SA in terms of AUC, sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical parameters, the SVM with the CSA optimal parameter set selection strategy achieves better performance than other strategies for predicting distant failure in lung SBRT patients.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to predict early distant failure in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using clinical parameters by machine learning algorithms. MATERIALS/ METHODS: The dataset used in this work includes 81 early stage NSCLCpatients with at least 6months of follow-up who underwent SBRT between 2006 and 2012 at a single institution. The clinical parameters (n=18) for each patient include demographic parameters, tumor characteristics, treatment fraction schemes, and pretreatment medications. Three predictive models were constructed based on different machine learning algorithms: (1) artificial neural network (ANN), (2) logistic regression (LR) and (3) support vector machine (SVM). Furthermore, to select an optimal clinical parameter set for the model construction, three strategies were adopted: (1) clonal selection algorithm (CSA) based selection strategy; (2) sequential forward selection (SFS) method; and (3) statistical analysis (SA) based strategy. 5-cross-validation is used to validate the performance of each predictive model. The accuracy was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity of the system was also evaluated. RESULTS: The AUCs for ANN, LR and SVM were 0.75, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively. The sensitivity values for ANN, LR and SVM were 71.2%, 72.9% and 83.1%, while the specificity values for ANN, LR and SVM were 59.1%, 63.6% and 63.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, the CSA based strategy outperformed SFS and SA in terms of AUC, sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical parameters, the SVM with the CSA optimal parameter set selection strategy achieves better performance than other strategies for predicting distant failure in lung SBRTpatients.
Authors: Robert Timmerman; Rebecca Paulus; James Galvin; Jeffrey Michalski; William Straube; Jeffrey Bradley; Achilles Fakiris; Andrea Bezjak; Gregory Videtic; David Johnstone; Jack Fowler; Elizabeth Gore; Hak Choy Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Guido Lammering; Jeroen Buijsen; Marco H M Janssen; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Pieter Slagmolen; Maarten Lambrecht; Domenico Rubello; Marcello Gava; Alessandro Giordano; Eric O Postma; Karin Haustermans; Carlo Capirci; Vincenzo Valentini; Philippe Lambin Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: David S Ettinger; Douglas E Wood; Wallace Akerley; Lyudmila A Bazhenova; Hossein Borghaei; David Ross Camidge; Richard T Cheney; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Todd L Demmy; Thomas J Dilling; M Chris Dobelbower; Ramaswamy Govindan; Frederic W Grannis; Leora Horn; Thierry M Jahan; Ritsuko Komaki; Lee M Krug; Rudy P Lackner; Michael Lanuti; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Jules Lin; Billy W Loo; Renato Martins; Gregory A Otterson; Jyoti D Patel; Katherine M Pisters; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Eric Rohren; Steven E Schild; Theresa A Shapiro; Scott J Swanson; Kurt Tauer; Stephen C Yang; Kristina Gregory; Miranda Hughes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Angela van Baardwijk; Wolfgang A Tomé; Wouter van Elmpt; Søren M Bentzen; Bart Reymen; Rinus Wanders; Ruud Houben; Michel Ollers; Philippe Lambin; Dirk De Ruysscher Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Alberto Cerra-Franco; Sheng Liu; Michella Azar; Kevin Shiue; Samantha Freije; Jason Hinton; Christopher R Deig; Donna Edwards; Neil C Estabrook; Susannah G Ellsworth; Ke Huang; Khalil Diab; Mark P Langer; Richard Zellars; Feng-Ming Kong; Jun Wan; Tim Lautenschlaeger Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2018-12-29 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Shulong Li; Ning Yang; Bin Li; Zhiguo Zhou; Hongxia Hao; Michael R Folkert; Puneeth Iyengar; Kenneth Westover; Hak Choy; Robert Timmerman; Steve Jiang; Jing Wang Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Zhiguo Zhou; Michael Folkert; Puneeth Iyengar; Kenneth Westover; Yuanyuan Zhang; Hak Choy; Robert Timmerman; Steve Jiang; Jing Wang Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Issam El Naqa; Dan Ruan; Gilmer Valdes; Andre Dekker; Todd McNutt; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Wade Smith; Arvind Rao; Clifton Fuller; Ying Xiao; Frank Manion; Matthew Schipper; Charles Mayo; Jean M Moran; Randall Ten Haken Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 4.071