Literature DB >> 21176986

Development and external validation of a predictive model for pathological complete response of rectal cancer patients including sequential PET-CT imaging.

Ruud G P M van Stiphout1, Guido Lammering, Jeroen Buijsen, Marco H M Janssen, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Pieter Slagmolen, Maarten Lambrecht, Domenico Rubello, Marcello Gava, Alessandro Giordano, Eric O Postma, Karin Haustermans, Carlo Capirci, Vincenzo Valentini, Philippe Lambin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate an accurate predictive model and a nomogram for pathologic complete response (pCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data. Accurate prediction could enable more individualised surgical approaches, including less extensive resection or even a wait-and-see policy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Population based databases from 953 patients were collected from four different institutes and divided into three groups: clinical factors (training: 677 patients, validation: 85 patients), pre-CRT PET-CT (training: 114 patients, validation: 37 patients) and post-CRT PET-CT (training: 107 patients, validation: 55 patients). A pCR was defined as ypT0N0 reported by pathology after surgery. The data were analysed using a linear multivariate classification model (support vector machine), and the model's performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS: The occurrence rate of pCR in the datasets was between 15% and 31%. The model based on clinical variables (AUC(train)=0.61±0.03, AUC(validation)=0.69±0.08) resulted in the following predictors: cT- and cN-stage and tumour length. Addition of pre-CRT PET data did not result in a significantly higher performance (AUC(train)=0.68±0.08, AUC(validation)=0.68±0.10) and revealed maximal radioactive isotope uptake (SUV(max)) and tumour location as extra predictors. The best model achieved was based on the addition of post-CRT PET-data (AUC(train)=0.83±0.05, AUC(validation)=0.86±0.05) and included the following predictors: tumour length, post-CRT SUV(max) and relative change of SUV(max). This model performed significantly better than the clinical model (p(train)<0.001, p(validation)=0.056).
CONCLUSIONS: The model and the nomogram developed based on clinical and sequential PET-CT data can accurately predict pCR, and can be used as a decision support tool for surgery after prospective validation. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21176986     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  26 in total

1.  Impact of PET/CT for Restaging Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Eric Sorenson; Fernando Lambreton; Jian Q Yu; Tianyu Li; Crystal S Denlinger; Joshua E Meyer; Elin R Sigurdson; Jeffrey M Farma
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology--multifactorial decision support systems.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Maud H W Starmans; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Georgi Nalbantov; Hugo J W L Aerts; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Paul C Boutros; Pierluigi Granone; Vincenzo Valentini; Adrian C Begg; Dirk De Ruysscher; Andre Dekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Pucciarelli; L Bacigalupo; I Maretto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Locally Advanced Disease and Pelvic Exenterations.

Authors:  Christos Kontovounisios; Paris Tekkis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Tumor SUVmax Normalized to Liver Uptake on (18)F-FDG PET/CT Predicts the Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jihyun Park; Kyoung Jin Chang; Young Seok Seo; Byung Hyun Byun; Joon Ho Choi; Hansol Moon; Ilhan Lim; Byung Il Kim; Chang Woon Choi; Sang Moo Lim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-08-01

6.  The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing pathological response and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Lucia Leccisotti; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Chiara de Waure; Antonella Stefanelli; Brunella Barbaro; Fabio Maria Vecchio; Claudio Coco; Roberto Persiani; Antonio Crucitti; Antonino Pio Tortorelli; Alessandro Giordano; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Predicting distant failure in early stage NSCLC treated with SBRT using clinical parameters.

Authors:  Zhiguo Zhou; Michael Folkert; Nathan Cannon; Puneeth Iyengar; Kenneth Westover; Yuanyuan Zhang; Hak Choy; Robert Timmerman; Jingsheng Yan; Xian-J Xie; Steve Jiang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Temporal analysis of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity characterized by textural features in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Maria A Thomas; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  New perspectives in treatment decision for integrated management of rectal cancer: multimodal research for multimodal treatments.

Authors:  V Valentini; F Cellini
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 May-Jun

10.  International data-sharing for radiotherapy research: an open-source based infrastructure for multicentric clinical data mining.

Authors:  Erik Roelofs; André Dekker; Vincenzo Valentini; Philippe Lambin; Elisa Meldolesi; Ruud G P M van Stiphout
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.