Literature DB >> 27155892

Patient-specific parameter estimation in single-ventricle lumped circulation models under uncertainty.

Daniele E Schiavazzi1, Alessia Baretta2, Giancarlo Pennati2, Tain-Yen Hsia3, Alison L Marsden4.   

Abstract

Computational models of cardiovascular physiology can inform clinical decision-making, providing a physically consistent framework to assess vascular pressures and flow distributions, and aiding in treatment planning. In particular, lumped parameter network (LPN) models that make an analogy to electrical circuits offer a fast and surprisingly realistic method to reproduce the circulatory physiology. The complexity of LPN models can vary significantly to account, for example, for cardiac and valve function, respiration, autoregulation, and time-dependent hemodynamics. More complex models provide insight into detailed physiological mechanisms, but their utility is maximized if one can quickly identify patient specific parameters. The clinical utility of LPN models with many parameters will be greatly enhanced by automated parameter identification, particularly if parameter tuning can match non-invasively obtained clinical data. We present a framework for automated tuning of 0D lumped model parameters to match clinical data. We demonstrate the utility of this framework through application to single ventricle pediatric patients with Norwood physiology. Through a combination of local identifiability, Bayesian estimation and maximum a posteriori simplex optimization, we show the ability to automatically determine physiologically consistent point estimates of the parameters and to quantify uncertainty induced by errors and assumptions in the collected clinical data. We show that multi-level estimation, that is, updating the parameter prior information through sub-model analysis, can lead to a significant reduction in the parameter marginal posterior variance. We first consider virtual patient conditions, with clinical targets generated through model solutions, and second application to a cohort of four single-ventricle patients with Norwood physiology.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; Norwood procedure; lumped circulation models; patient-specific data assimilation; single-ventricle surgery; uncertainty analysis of simulated physiology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27155892      PMCID: PMC5499984          DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  34 in total

1.  Modeling of the Norwood circulation: effects of shunt size, vascular resistances, and heart rate.

Authors:  F Migliavacca; G Pennati; G Dubini; R Fumero; R Pietrabissa; G Urcelay; E L Bove; T Y Hsia; M R de Leval
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Model-based assessment of cardiovascular health from noninvasive measurements.

Authors:  Xinshu Xiao; Edwin T Ozawa; Yaqi Huang; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Tuning multidomain hemodynamic simulations to match physiological measurements.

Authors:  Ryan L Spilker; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Anatomic distribution of pulmonary vascular compliance.

Authors:  R G Presson; S H Audi; C C Hanger; G M Zenk; R A Sidner; J H Linehan; W W Wagner; C A Dawson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1998-01

5.  Model selection for ventricular mechanics: a sensitivity analysis approach.

Authors:  A Cappello; G Cevenini; G Avanzolini
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1987-01

6.  Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia.

Authors:  F Fontan; E Baudet
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Computer simulation studies of the venous circulation.

Authors:  M F Snyder; V C Rideout
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Physiologic repair of aortic atresia-hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Authors:  W I Norwood; P Lang; D D Hansen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-01-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparison of patterns of pulmonary venous blood flow in the functional single ventricle heart after operative aortopulmonary shunt versus superior cavopulmonary shunt.

Authors:  J Rychik; M A Fogel; M T Donofrio; E Goldmuntz; M S Cohen; T L Spray; M L Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Outcomes of late atrial tachyarrhythmias in adults after the Fontan operation.

Authors:  A Ghai; L Harris; D A Harrison; G D Webb; S C Siu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Lumped parameter model for hemodynamic simulation of congenital heart diseases.

Authors:  Shuji Shimizu; Dai Une; Toru Kawada; Yohsuke Hayama; Atsunori Kamiya; Toshiaki Shishido; Masaru Sugimachi
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Bayesian inference of constitutive model parameters from uncertain uniaxial experiments on murine tendons.

Authors:  Akinjide R Akintunde; Kristin S Miller; Daniele E Schiavazzi
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-04-30

3.  Automated generation of 0D and 1D reduced-order models of patient-specific blood flow.

Authors:  Martin R Pfaller; Jonathan Pham; Aekaansh Verma; Luca Pegolotti; Nathan M Wilson; David W Parker; Weiguang Yang; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 2.648

4.  Predictive Modeling of Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension in Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction.

Authors:  Karlyn K Harrod; Jeffrey L Rogers; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Alison L Marsden; Daniele E Schiavazzi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  A computational bio-chemo-mechanical model of in vivo tissue-engineered vascular graft development.

Authors:  Ramak Khosravi; Abhay B Ramachandra; Jason M Szafron; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Christopher K Breuer; Jay D Humphrey
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Multilevel and multifidelity uncertainty quantification for cardiovascular hemodynamics.

Authors:  Casey M Fleeter; Gianluca Geraci; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 6.756

7.  The effects of clinically-derived parametric data uncertainty in patient-specific coronary simulations with deformable walls.

Authors:  Jongmin Seo; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 8.  Fontan Surgical Planning: Previous Accomplishments, Current Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Phillip M Trusty; Timothy C Slesnick; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Jarek Rossignac; Kirk R Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Inverse problems in reduced order models of cardiovascular haemodynamics: aspects of data assimilation and heart rate variability.

Authors:  Sanjay Pant; Chiara Corsini; Catriona Baker; Tain-Yen Hsia; Giancarlo Pennati; Irene E Vignon-Clementel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  An optimal control approach to determine resistance-type boundary conditions from in-vivo data for cardiovascular simulations.

Authors:  Elisa Fevola; Francesco Ballarin; Laura Jiménez-Juan; Stephen Fremes; Stefano Grivet-Talocia; Gianluigi Rozza; Piero Triverio
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 2.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.