| Literature DB >> 27153053 |
Chao Huang1,2, Dejiang Pang3, Qihui Luo4,5, Xiaolin Chen6,7, Qi Gao8,9, Liangqin Shi10,11, Wentao Liu12,13, Yuanfeng Zou14, Lixia Li15, Zhengli Chen16,17.
Abstract
The pandemic tendency of obesity and its strong association with serious co-morbidities have elicited interest in the underlying mechanisms of these pathologies. Lipid homeostasis, closely involved in obesity, has been reported to be regulated by multiple pathways. mTORC1 is emerging as a critical regulator of lipid metabolism. Here, we describe that the consumption of soy isoflavones, with a structural similarity to that of estradiol, could mitigate obesity through an AKT/mTORC1 pathway. Fed with soy isoflavones, the diet-induced obesity (DIO) male rats exhibited decreased body weight, accompanied with suppressed lipogenesis and adipogenesis, as well as enhanced lipolysis and β‑oxidation. The phosphorylation of AKT and S6 were decreased after soy isoflavone treatment in vivo and in vitro, suggesting an inhibition effect of soy isoflavones on mTORC1 activity. Our study reveals a potential mechanism of soy isoflavones regulating lipid homeostasis, which will be important for obesity treatment.Entities:
Keywords: lipid metabolism; mTORC1; obesity; soy isoflavones
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27153053 PMCID: PMC6273643 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21050586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Soy isoflavones reduce the body weight, as well as the plasma TG and LDL concentrations. (A) Quantification shows the body weight of rats feed with basal diets and high fat diets; (B) Quantification shows no difference in food intake of rats feed with basal diets and high fat diets; (C) Quantification shows the body weight trend of DIO rats feed with basal diets and the addition with different doses of soy isoflavones. a**: b vs. a, p < 0.01; d*: b vs. d, p < 0.05; e*: b vs. e, p < 0.05; (D) Quantification shows the food intake trend of DIO rats feed with basal diets and the addition with different doses of soy isoflavones. d*: a vs. d, p < 0.05; e*: a vs. e, p < 0.05; (E) Quantification shows the triglycerides concentration of DIO rats feed with basal diets and the addition with different doses of soy isoflavones; (F) Quantification shows the LDL concentration of DIO rats feed with basal diets and the addition with different doses of soy isoflavones. Error bars indicate SEM. Significant difference in: a control group, b obesity group, c low-dose soy isoflavones group, d middle-dose soy isoflavones group, e high-dose soy isoflavones group. ns, no statistical significance, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2Soy isoflavones suppress the lipid accumulation in vivo and in vitro. (A) Representative images of Oil Red O staining show the accumulation lipid in the liver of rats feed with different diets. The insets show enlarged lipid droplets. Bar: 50 μm; (B) Representative images of H and E staining show the steatosis (arrow indicated) in the liver of rats feed with different diets. Bar: 100 μm; (C) Representative images of Oil Red O staining show the accumulation lipid, induce by 1 mM OA for 24 h, following a 24 h daidzein and genistein treatment in HepG2 cells. SC, solvent control; OA, oleic acid. The insets show enlarged lipid droplets. Bar: 50 μm; (D) Quantification shows a significant decrease in the ratio of the lipid integral optical density between OB groups and soy isoflavone-addition groups. The dashed shows the ctr; (E) Quantification shows a significant decrease in the ratio of the lipid integral optical density in daidzein- and genistein-treated HepG2 cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; (F) Quantification shows the cell viability of HepG2 cells treated with daidzein and genistein. Error bars indicate SEM. n = 3.
Figure 3Soy isoflavones suppress lipogenesis and adipogenesis, and enhance lipolysis and β‑oxidation in DIO rats. (A) qRT-PCR shows decreased mRNA levels of the lipogenesis-related genes as indicated in liver of the soy isoflavone-fed DIO rats in comparison to the OB group; (B) qRT-PCR shows increased mRNA levels of the β‑oxidation related genes as indicated in liver of the soy isoflavone-fed DIO rats in comparison to OB group; (C) Quantification shows changes of the average area of a single intra-abdominal lipocyte in rats fed different diets; (D) qRT-PCR shows increased mRNA levels of ATGL, while a decreased mRNA levels of PPARγ, as indicated in white adipose tissue of the soy isoflavone-fed DIO rats in comparison to the OB groups; (E,F) Western blots and quantification show an increase in ACL, and a decrease in ACSL1 in the liver of the soy isoflavone- fed DIO rats in comparison to the OB group; (G,H) Western blots and quantification show an increase in ATGL in the liver of the soy isoflavone-fed DIO rats in comparison to the OB group. Error bars indicate SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. The dashed shows the ctr.
Figure 4Soy isoflavones suppress the mTORC1 activity via AKT pathway. (A,B) Western blots and quantification show a suppression function of soy isolflavones on mTORC1 activity in DIO rats; (C,D) Western blots and quantification show a suppression function of soy isoflavones on mTORC1 activity in HepG2 cells. Error bars indicate SEM. * p< 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Composition of the basal diets.
| Ingredients | Content |
|---|---|
| Corn | 54.0% |
| Fish meal | 6.0% |
| Wheat bran | 14.0% |
| Alfalfa meal | 13.0% |
| Cotton meal | 10.0% |
| Limestone | 1.00% |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 0.2% |
| Dodium chloride | 0.3% |
| Vitamin & mineral | 1.5% |
Composition of the experimental diets from week eight to week 12.
| Groups | Control Groups (Ctr, | Obesity Groups (OB, | Low-Dose Soy Isoflavones (LSI, | Middle-Dose Soy Isoflavones (MSI, | High-Dose Soy Isoflavones (HIS, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diets | Basal diets | Basal diets | Basal diets + 50 mg/kg soy isoflavones | Basal diets + 150 mg/kg soy isoflavones | Basal diets + 400 mg/kg soy isoflavones |
Composition of the soy isoflavone extracts.
| Compounds | Content |
|---|---|
| Daidzin | 50.98% |
| Glycitin | 30.36% |
| Genistein | 8.80% |
| Daidzein | 1.24% |
| Genistin | 0.06% |
| Total isoflavones | 91.64% |
Primers used for the real-time PCR analysis. The amplification efficiency and specificity were confirmed before real-time PCR assay.
| Gene | Primers |
|---|---|
| Fr 5’-TGGACTACTAGTGTTGGCCTGCTT-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-ATCCAGGTCAGCTTGTTTGCGATG-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-ATTGTGGCTCAAACTGCAGGT-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-GCCAATCCACTCGAAGACCA-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-CAACATCCGTCAGACGACCTC-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-CGGACTCGTTGGTGATGAAGA-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-TCCCAGGTCTTGCCGTGC-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-GCGGATGCCTAGGATGTGTGC-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-GGTGCTTCAGCCTACCATCTTCC-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-AATCCAACAGCCATCGCTTCACT-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-TATGGGCTGACAGAATCATG-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-CAACTCTTCCAGTAGTGTAG-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-ACTCGCAGGAAAGACTAGCA-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-AGCAGTGGAAGAATCGGACC-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-TCAGGTGTCTTTGCGGGTAT-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-CTTGTGCGGAAGAAGATGCT-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-TCACCAACACCAGCATCCA-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-GCACATCTCTCGAAGCACCA-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-CATTCGCATCTTTCAGGG-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-GGACGCCATACTTTAGGA-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-GCAGCACGTGATCCATGAAT-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-GTGGGATGCTGGACAACATC-3’ | |
| Fr 5’-GTACCACTGGCATTGTGATG-3’ | |
| Rv 5’-ATCTTCATGGTGCTAGGAGC-3’ |